west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻" 4 results
  • Clinical Significance of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

    目的 探讨后腹腔镜手术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(ureteropeluic junction obstruction, UPJO)的手术技巧和临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2006年7月-2009年10月59例采用后腹腔镜手术治疗UPJO患者的临床资料。后腹腔镜下行UPJO周围压迫组织松解术18例,Y-V成形术25例,离断成形术16例。 结果 术后随访3~36个月。所有患者手术均顺利完成。静脉肾盂造影均提示造影剂通过良好,肾积水均得到明显改善。 结论 后腹腔镜治疗UPJO创伤小,患者术后痛苦小、恢复快、住院时间短、疗效显著,可作为UPJO治疗的首选治疗方法。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty (Report of 17 Cases)

    目的:探讨后腹腔镜离断式肾盂成形术的临床价值。方法:采用后腹腔镜技术对17例肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)患者实施离断式肾盂成形术。结果:17例手术全部成功,手术时间95~165 min,平均130 min,术中出血20~90 mL,平均50 mL。术后15例随访3~16个月,IVU检查吻合口无狭窄,患肾积水减轻或消失,腰部疼痛消失。结论:后腹腔镜离断式肾盂成形术创伤小、安全、有效,是肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)新的治疗选择,可替代传统的开放手术。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureterpelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) versus open pyeloplasty (OP) for patients with ureterpelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2015), Sciverse, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI from inception to Dec., 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized clinical controlled trials (CCTs) about LP versus OP for UPJO patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 38 studies including 8 RCTs and 30 CCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis based on RCTs showed that, there were no significant differences in successful operation rate (OR=0.50, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.24, P=0.13) and the incidence of postoperative complications (OR=1.19, 95%CI 0.61 to 2.31, P=0.62) between the OP group and the LP group; The operation time of the OP group was shorter than that of the LP group (MD=62.07, 95%CI 3.94 to 120.19, P=0.04), but this difference was not found in subgroup analysis of retroperitoneal approach (MD=49.99, 95%CI -23.69 to 123.67, P=0.18); The hospital stay of the LP group was shorter than that of the OP group (MD=-3.96, 95%CI -4.92 to -2.99, P<0.0001). The results of meta-analysis based on CCTs showed that, there was no significant difference in successful operation rate between two groups (OR=1.34, 95%CI 0.84 to 2.16, P=0.22), and similar results were found in subgroup analysis of transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches; The incidence of postoperative complications of the LP group was shorter than that of the OP group (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.69, P<0.0001); The hospital stay of the LP group was shorter than that of the OP group (MD=-3.87, 95%CI -4.90 to -2.83, P<0.00001) and similar result was found in subgroup analysis of transperitoneal approach (MD=-4.08, 95%CI -5.21 to -2.95, P<0.0001); There was no significant difference between two groups in operation time (MD=24.15, 95%CI -7.56 to 55.87, P=0.14). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, the successful operation rate between LP and OP operations is similar, but the LP operation has less incidence of postoperative complication and shorter hospital stay. Due to limited quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs more high quality studies to verify.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

    Objective To investigate the clinical effect of retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods From November 2010 to September 2015, a total of 28 cases (21 males and 7 females) with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. All the 28 patients had a previous history of different degrees of lumbar pain, which was confirmed as typical UPJO by imaging examination. Operation method: following complete renal pelvis and upper ureter isolation, the renal pelvis was clipped into a trumpet-shaped mouth, 1/3 of the upper renal pelvis was temporarily kept without section. In the inferior margin of renal pelvis, longitudinal cut procedure was operated in the ureter and across the stenotic segment in about 1–2 cm; and then, anastomosis of the ureter and the renal pelvis at the lowest was performed, to maintain the continuity of the renal pelvis and ureter. Subsequently, the stenosed segment of ureter and the dilatant renal pelvis were removed, the posterior ureteropelvic anastomosis was made with an interrupted suture, and antegrade stenting of double J tube was further performed, followed by a continuous suture of the anterior wall. Results The procedure was successfully accomplished in all patients whithout conversion to open surgery. The operating time was 90-240 minutes with the median time of 160 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 20-70 mL with the median of 50 mL. No severe surgical complication occurred in perioperative period. The 3-24 -month follow up showed that symptoms of lumbar pain were relieved or disappeared in all the incorporated patients. Postoperative radiographic examination showed no stomal stenosis at the ureteropelvic junction, and the hydronephrosis was alleviated. Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for UPJO is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive surgical technique. The key to the success of the operation is to the accurate renal pelvis clipping, tension- and torsion-free anastomosis of the lowest position of the renal pelvis and the ureter, and the reconstruction of a new funnel-shaped ureteropelvic junction.

    Release date:2017-06-22 02:01 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content