Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, CBM and The Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCT) of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor-(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. The search was updated in Semptember 2009. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 14 reports from 10 RCTs were identified. Five RCTs were graded A and five graded B. The meta-analyses indicated: RR (95%CI) values of the 1, 2, 4-year acute rejection rates were 1.64 (1.19, 2.27), 1.53 (1.06, 2.22) and 1.21 (0.73, 1.98), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year patient survival rates were – 0.01 (– 0.02, 0.01), – 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.02) and 0.03 (– 0.01, 0.08), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year graft survival rates were 0.00 (– 0.02, 0.02), 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.04) and 0.07 (0.01, 0.12), respectively; and glomerular filtration rate WMD was 9.50 and 95%CI 2.96 to 16.03. Conclusion Based on the current evidence, compared to CNI, CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation could be advantageous for renal function. One-year acute rejection rate and 4-year graft survival rate increase. One-year patient/graft survival and fouryear acute rejection rate remain virtually unvariable. The long-term results need further confirmation.
目的报告1例分期肝肾联合移植，并探讨分期肝肾联合移植治疗技术及其效果。方法对1例晚期乙型肝炎肝硬变伴肾功能衰竭患者实施原位肝移植术，所用免疫抑制方案为环孢霉素A与甲基强的松龙联合用药，于肝移植术后3个月行肾移植术。结果肝移植术后肝功能恢复良好，但肾功能持续恶化，经血液透析治疗无效而行肾移植术。患者肝肾联合移植术后9个月，一般情况良好，移植肝和移植肾功能均正常。结论对肝移植后各种原因导致的肾功能衰竭，当血液透析治疗无效时可再行肾移植术。同时，免疫抑制剂用量并未增加。
胰腺移植主要包括单独胰腺移植（pancreas transplantation alone, PTA）、肾移植后胰腺移植（pancreas after kidney transplantation, PAK）和胰肾联合移植（simultaneous pancreaskidney transplantation, SPK）。与其它实体大器官移植一样，胰腺移植成功的真正转折始于20世纪70年代末。随着新型免疫抑制剂的开发和应用、器官保存技术的改进和外科技术的日臻成熟，胰腺移植在全球范围内得到迅猛开展，胰腺移植受体及器官存活率显著提高。据国际胰腺移植登记中心（International Pancreas Transplant Registry, IPTR）记录，至2001年10月，全球已实施17 000余例胰腺移植，其中美国有11 500余例，胰腺移植后患者1年生存率超过95%，3年生存率接近90%； 移植胰腺1年和3年有功能生存率分别为83%和77%［1，2］。自1966年首例SPK在美国Minnesota大学成功实施以来，SPK已成为治疗Ⅰ型糖尿病合并肾功能衰竭的常规方法，全世界迄今为止已实施的胰腺移植中约90%采用该术式［3，4］。
Objective To investigate the clinical features of pnuemonia in renal transplant recipients in order to improve the clinical diagnostic and treatment efficacy.Methods The clinical data of 29 recipients with pneumonia following renal transplantation in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1,1999 to July 31,2006 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.Results Of the 29 cases with pneumonia，one case（3.4%，1/29）were diagnosed as nosocomial acquired pneumonia and twenty eight cases（96.6%，28/29）as community acquired pneumonia.Of the total,cytomegalovirus （CMV） pneumonia were validated in 19 cases, bacteria pneumonia in 10 cases, fungus pneumonia in 3 cases,and Pneumocystis Carini infection in one case while none pathogen were confirmed in 5 cases with pneumonia.37.5%（9/24）cases with pneumonia which pathogen were ascertained were resulted from multiple pathogen infection.Opportunistic organism is the main pathogen of pneumonia in renal transplant recipients and the disease commonly manifested as interstitial pneumonia. 27 cases（93.1%）developed to severe pneumonia in which 15 cases were deteriorated to acute respiratory distress syndrome.Excluding 5 cases who withdrew from the hospital,4 cases （16.7%，4/24）died and 20（83.3%，20/24） cases were cured.During the second to the sixth month especially the second to the thrid month after renal transplantation the recipients were at higher-risk of pneumonia.Conclusions The majority of pneumonia in kidney recipients were severe community acquired pneumonia caused by multiple pathogens.CMV pneumonia and bacteria pneumonia are the most common types and major causes of mortality.Mortality of fungus pneumonia and CMV pneumonia are highest.Proper diagnostic procedures and therapeutic strategies are critical to improve survival rate.
Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness between primary cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after renal transplantation. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 18 patients (21 hips) with ONFH after renal transplantation undergoing cemented THA in 11 cases (13 hips) (cemented group) and uncemented THA in 7 cases (8 hips) (uncemented group) between February 2005 and February 2012. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, ONFH stage, preoperative Harris score, and bone density between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 2 groups; the hip function was assessed based on Harris scores; X-ray film was used to observe the prosthetic situation. Results All the wounds healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 6-77 months (mean, 46 months) in the cemented group, and 4-71 months (mean, 42 months) in the uncemented group. Femoral prosthesis infection occurred in 1 case (1 hip) respectively in each group; hip dislocation, femoral prosthesis loosening, and acetabular prosthesis loosening occurred in 1 case (1 hip) of the cemented group, respectively. At last follow-up, the incidences of postoperative complications and revision rate of the cemented group were 30.7% (4/13) and 23.1% (3/13) respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the uncemented group [12.5% (1/8) and 0 (0/8)] (P=0.047, P=0.040). Harris score was significantly increased to 94.1 ± 3.7 in the uncemented group and 90.0 ± 4.2 in the cemented group, showing significant differences compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups (t=1.815, P=0.062). Postoperative X-ray films showed that the initial position of the prosthesis was satisfactory. At last follow-up, the bone fixation, fibrous stability, and loosening of the femoral prosthesis and loosening of acetabular prosthesis occurred in 9 hips, 3 hips, 1 hip, and 1 hip of the cemented group, respectively; bone fixation of the femoral prosthesis and stability of acetabular prosthesis were observed in all hips of the uncemented group. There was no heterotopic ossification in 2 groups. Conclusion Uncemented THA after renal transplantation can obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness, and uncemented THA is better than the cemented THA; however, the middle- and long-term effectivenesses need further observation．
Objective To review the vascular anatomy of the donor and the reci pient for the l iving kidney transplantation. Methods The recent l iterature about the vessels of donor and reci pient in cl inical appl ications was extensively reviewed. Results The pertinent vascular anatomy of the donor and recipient was essential for the screening of the proper candidates, surgical planning and long-term outcome. Early branching and accessory renal artery of the donor were particularly important to deciding the side of nephrectomy, surgical technique and anastomosing pattern, and their injuries were the most frequent factor of the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. With increase of laparoscopic nephrectomy indonors, accurate venous anatomy was paid more and more attention to because venous bleeding could also lead to conversion to open nephrectomy. Multidetector CT (MDCT) could supplant the conventional excretory urography and renal catheter angiography and could accurately depict the donors’ vessels, vascular variations. In addition, MDCT can excellently evaluate the status of donor kidney, collecting system and other pertinent anatomy details. Conclusion Accurate master of related vascular anatomy can facil iate operation plan and success of operation and can contribute to the rapid development of living donor kidney transplantation. MDCT has become the choice of preoperative one-stop image assessment for living renal donors.
To discuss renovascular reconstruction during l iving related donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Methods Seventy-seven cases of LDKT from April 2006 to March 2008 were retrospectively analyzed, including 63 cases in single renal artery group and 14 cases in multi ple artery group. In multi ple artery group, there were 3 cases of three arteries and 11 cases of double arteries; 9 cases of donated left kidneys and 5 cases of donated right kidneys. Potential donors underwent fully medical evaluation before operation, including donor-reci pient human leucocyte antigen matchingand a cross match test. The donor’s operation of the incision either underneath the 12th rib approaching the dorsal lumbar was performed and the transplantation operation adopted the extraperitoneal approach in the contralateral fossa il iac. The arteries in the multiple artery group were implanted onto the external (or common) il iac artery different from the orthodox method. Results In multiple artery group, no blood transfusion during operation was performed, no compl ication occurred after operation and all donors were discharged after 7-9 days of postoperation. After a follow-up of 3 months to 1 year, all the recipients kept normal kidney function without renal tubule necrosis, renal artery embol ism, vascular stenosis, urinary fistula and ureter necrosis. The ultrasound examination showed that the transplanted kidney had good blood supply. There was no significant difference in the time of urine secretion, serum creatinine level after 1 week of operation, length of hospital ization between the multiple artery group and the single artery group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The accurate treatment of multiple artery anastomosis are critical for the safety of the LDKT.