Thoracolumbar injury is a common injury in clinic. Accurate diagnosis and classification is of great significance for guiding treatment. Although there are many typing systems, no typing system has been widely accepted and used to guide clinical practice. Denis classification, spinal load classification, thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score or thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and AO classification have great influence in clinical practice, but they all have some shortcomings. In recent years, the classification of thoracolumbar injury has been updated, modified and supplemented constantly. When using these fracture types in clinical practice, different people often have some deviation. This paper reviews the widely used thoracolumbar injury classification system, discusses the main viewpoints, advantages and disadvantages of each classification system, and looks into the future research direction based on the current research progress.
ObjectiveTo compare short-term effectiveness between robot-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 52 cases of thoracolumbar fracture without neurological injury symptoms admitted between January 2018 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into minimally invasive group (24 cases, treated with robot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation) and open group (28 cases, treated with traditional open internal fixation). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the general data such as gender, age, cause of injury, fracture segment, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS), preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, fixed segment height, and fixed segment kyphosis Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of the two groups were recorded and compared; as well as the VAS score, ODI score, fixed segment height, and fixed segment kyphosis Cobb angle of the two groups before operation and at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 10 months after operation. CT scan was reexamined at 1-3 days after operation, and the pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate was determined and calculated according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard.ResultsThe operation time of the minimally invasive group was significantly longer than that of the open group, but the intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than those of the open group (P<0.05). There were 132 pedicle screws and 158 pedicle screws implanted in the minimally invasive group and the open group respectively. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard, the accuracy of pedicle screws was 97.7% (129/132) and 96.8% (153/158), respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.505, P=0.777). The patients in both groups were followed up 10 months, and there was no rejection or internal fixation fracture. In the minimally invasive group, the internal fixator was removed at 10 months after operation, but not in the open group. The VAS score, ODI score, fixed segment heigh, and fixed segment kyphotic Cobb angle of the two groups were improved in different degrees when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). Except that the VAS score and ODI score of the minimally invasive group were significantly better than those of the open group at 3 days after operation (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05).ConclusionRobot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures has significant advantages in intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and early postoperative effectiveness and other aspects, and the effect of fracture reduction is good.
Objective To compare the surgical efficacy of different operating methods for treating old thoracolumbarfracture with spinal cord injury. Methods From September 2000 to March 2006, 34 cases of old thoracolumbar fractures with spinal cord injury were treated. Patients were divided into 2 groups randomly. Group A (n=18): anterior approach osteotomy, il iac bone graft and internal fixation were used. There were 10 males and 8 females with the age of 17-54 years. The apex level of kyphosis was T11 in 2 cases, T12 in 5 cases, L1 in 8 cases and L2 in 3 cases. The average preoperative Cobb angle of kyphosis was (36.33 ± 3.13)°, and the average preoperative difference in height between anterior and posterior of involved vertebra was (22.34 ± 11.61) mm. Neurological dysfunction JOA score was 10.44 ± 1.12. Group B (n=16): transpedicular posterior decompression and internal fixation were used. There were 8 males and 8 females with the age of 18-56 years. The apex level of kyphosis was T11 in 2 cases, T12 in 6 cases, L1 in 7 cases and L2 in 1 case. The preoperative Cobb angle of kyphosis was (38.55 ± 4.22)°, and the preoperative difference in height between anterior and posterior of involved vertebra was (20.61 ± 10.22) mm. Neurological dysfunction JOA score was 10.23 ± 2.23. Results All the patients were followed up for 9-46 months with an average of 13.5 months. Cobb angle was (12.78 ± 3.76)° in group A, which was improved by (24.23 ± 1.64)° campared to that of preoperation; and was (10.56 ± 4.23)° in group B, which was improved by (26.66 ± 1.66)°. JOA score was 14.21 ± 1.08 in group A, which wasimproved by 3.92 ± 1.33; and it was 13.14 ± 2.32 in group B, which was improved by 3.12 ± 1.95. The average postoperative difference between anterior height and posterior height of vertebral body in group A was (3.11 ± 1.06) mm, which was improved by (18.03 ± 2.14) mm; and it was (2.56 ± 1.33) mm in group B, which was corrected by (20.36 ± 3.78) mm. There were statistically significant differences in the above indexes between preoperation and postoperation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.01), but no significant differences between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). In group A, pleural effusion occurred in 2 cases and local pulmonary collapse in 4 cases and intercostals neuralgia in 1 case. In group B, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid occurred in 3 cases. Conclusion Both anterior and posterior approach are capable of treating of the old thoracolumbar fracture with incomplete spinal cord injury and providing the satisfying result of deformation correction, neurological decompression and neurological functional recovery to a certain extent.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar tuberculosis. MethodsBetween January 2009 and January 2013, 97 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis were treated with posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation in 53 cases (group A), and with traditional posterior operation in 44 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in age, sex, disease duration, affected segments, Frankel grade, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), sagittal Cobb angle, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The surgery and follow-up results were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe patients were followed up 24-60 months. All patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion after operation. The bone graft fusion time of groups A and B was (6.79±1.68) months and (6.89±2.00) months respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-0.251, P=0.802). There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperation blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization time between 2 groups (P>0.05); the postoperative drainage volume of group A was significantly less than that of group B (P<0.05). The CRP and ESR at 1 year and the VAS score at last follow-up were significantly decreased when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). The Cobb angle at 1 week and at last follow-up and ODI at 3 months and at last followup were significantly improved in 2 groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the time points after operation (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation, the ODI of group A was significantly lower than that of group B (t=-2.185, P=0.027), but no significant difference was found in Cobb angle, Cobb angle loss, and ODI at other time points between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the Frankel classification of nerve function was improved 1-2 grades in 2 groups, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=-0.180, P=0.857). No complication of internal fixation breakage or loosening was observed. ConclusionThe effectiveness of posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis is satisfactory, with the advantages of less trauma, strong spinal stability, and fast function recovery.
OBJECTIVE To study the difference between two internal fixation methods Kaneda and Z-plate in the operation of anterior surgical approach and decompression after thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: The bio-mechanical structure of the internal fixture, install when operating, complications and time of the operation were compared in the cases by Kaneda and Z-plate. RESULTS: Z-plate method had the following characteristics: reasonable of the bio-mechanical structure; stability after internal fixture being installed; capability of completely propping up the injured centrum and keeping the height of middle-column; simple operation when installing internal fixture and shorter time of operation (1.1 hours, P lt; 0.05); fewer complications. CONCLUSION: Z-plate is an ideal internal fixation method in the operation of anterior surgical approach after thoracolumbar fractures. Thoracolumbar vertebra Fracture Internal fixation
Objective To summarize the effect of one-stage anterior debridement of infection in function reconstruction of anterior and middle column for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. Methods From January 2001 to January 2007, 65 patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis were treated with one-stage anterior debridement, decompression, autogenous bone grafts and internal fixation. There were 43 males and 22 females with an average age of 40.2 years (range, 19-64 years), including 18 cases of thoracic tuberculosis (T4-10), 44 cases of thoracolumbar tuberculosis (T11-L2) and 3 cases of lumbar tuberculosis (L3-5). The disease course was 3 months to 10 years (median 10 months). One segment was involved in 7 cases, two segments in 54 cases and three segments in 4 cases. In 14 cases with spinalcord injury, there were 5 cases of grade C and 9 cases of grade D according to Frankel classification. The kyphotic Cobb angle was 20-65° (41° on average). Results The operative time was 120-210 minutes (170 minutes on average), and the blood loss was 300-1 500 mL (600 mL on average). Fifty-eight patients were followed up for 1-6 years (23 months on average). Abscess occurred in 2 cases at 40 days and 3 months, and healed after symptomatic management. The other incisions achieved heal ing by first intention. The X-ray films showed bony fusion 4-12 months (6 months on average) after operation. No tuberculosis recurred. At 12 months after operation, pain disappeared, and there were 7 cases of grade D and 7 cases of grade E according to Frankel classification. The kyphotic Cobb angle was 0-33° (24° on average), showing statistically significant difference (P lt; 0.05) when compared with preoperation. Conclusion Early reconstruction of load-bearing function and stabil ity of anterior and middle column in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis is great significant. The appl ication of one-stage anterior surgery with debridement, decompression, autogenous bone grafts and internal fixation in the operative treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis is safe and effective after a rigorous anti-tuberculosis treatment.
Objective To explore the failure cause of posterior approach orthopaedic operation of thoracolumbar hemivertebra, and to summary strategies of revision. Methods The cl inical data from 9 cases undergoing posterior approach orthopaedic operation failure of thoracolumbar hemivertebra between June 2003 and June 2008, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 4 females with a median age of 12 years (range, 1 year and 10 months to 24 years). All malformations were identified as fully segmented hemivertebra from the original medical records and X-ray films, including 2 cases in thoracic vertebra, 5 cases in thoracolumbar vertebra, and 2 cases in lumbar vertebra. The preoperative scol iotic Cobb angle was (45.4 ± 17.4)°, and kyphotic Cobb angle was (29.8 ± 22.0)°. The reason of primary surgical failure were analyzed and spinal deformity was corrected again with posterior revision. Results All surgeries were finished successfully. The operation time was 3.0-6.5 hours (mean, 4.5 hours), and the perioperative bleeding was 400-2 500 mL (mean, 950 mL). All incisions healed by first intention; no infection or deep venous thrombosis occurred. Numbness occurred in unilateral lower extremity of 1 case postoperatively, and the symptom was rel ieved completely after treatment of detumescence and neural nutrition. All cases were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 18 months). No pseudoarthrosis and implant failure occurred. The X-ray films showed that the bone grafts completely fused within 8-14 months (mean, 11 months) after operation. The Cobb angles of scol iosis and kyphosis at 1 week after operation and the last follow-up were obviously improved when compared with preoperative ones, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). No obvious correction loss was observed either in coronal or sagittal plane. Conclusion The failure causes of posterior approach orthopaedic operation are hemivertebra processing, selection of fixation and fusion range, and selection of internal fixation. If the strategies of revision are made after the above-mentioned failure causes are considered, the cl inical results will be satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the cl inical characteristics and methods of diagnosis and treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Methods From March 2002 to March 2006, 17 patients with 35 thoracolumbar spinal fractures were treated, 13 males and 4 females, aged 21-52 years old (36.4 on average), among whom there were 10 cases of traffic accident injury and 7 of high fall ing injury. One fracture was located at T2, 1 at T3, 1 at T10, 4 at T11, 6 at T12, 5 at L1, 3 at L2, 7 at L3, 5 at L4, and 2 at L15, with a total of 35 segments including 26 segments with unstable fractures and 9 segments with stable compression fractures. According to the Frankel grade, there was 1 case of grade A, 1 of grade B, 2 of grade C, 5 of grade D and 8 of grade E. The preoperative height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (20.8 ± 3.8) mm and the preoperative kyphosis angle was (16.2 ± 3.4)°. All the unstable fractures were performed operation. Sixteen injured vertebras were treated with long-segment pedicle screw internal fixation; 8 were treated with short-segment pedicle screw internal fixation, and 2 were treated with anterior fusion and fixation. Five injured vertebras with stable compression fractures were not treated and 4 were treated with pedicle screw implantation. Results The operation time was 1.8-4.2 hours and the amount of blood loss was 300-900 mL. The incisions obtained heal ing by first intention after the operation. All 17 patients were followed up for 13-41 months (18 months on average), and radiological evaluation showed no failure of the internal fixation. After the operation, the Frankel scale assessment showed that 1 patient of grade A improved to grade B, 1 of grade B improved to grade C, 1 of grade C improved to grade D, 1 of grade C improved to grade E, 5 of grade D improved to grade E, and 8 of grade E had no improvement. At the final postoperative follow-up, the height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (31.9 ± 3.2) mm and the kyphosis angle was (6.8 ± 3.7)°, which were significantly different from those of preoperation (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures should be individual ized according to the patients’ actual conditions in order to obtain decompression and stabil ity of spines.
Objective To investigate the effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation with long screws and distraction-reduction on mild to moderate thoracolumbar fractures treated by posterior open and short-segmental fixation. MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients with mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group ISDRF (intermediate screws then distraction-reduction fixation, 32 cases) and group DRISF (distraction-reduction then intermediate screws fixation, 36 cases) according to the different operation methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, and preoperative load-sharing classification score, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, vertebral canal occupational rate, back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior height of fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The vertebral canal occupational rate, anterior height of fractured vertebra, kyphosis Cobb angle, and back pain VAS score before and after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). No vascular or spinal nerve injury and deep infections or skin infections occurred in both groups. At 1 week after operation, the vertebral canal occupational rate in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the difference of vertebral canal occupational rate before and after operation and improvement between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 22.3 months. All vertebral fractures reached bone union at 6 months postoperatively. At last follow-up, there was no internal fixation failures such as broken screws, broken rods or loose screws, but there were 2 cases of mild back pain in the ISDRF group. The intra-group comparison showed that the back pain VAS score, the anterior height of fractured vertebra, and the Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved at each time point postoperatively (P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 months postoperatively and last follow-up were also improved when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the anterior height of fractured vertebra in the ISDRF group was significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05), the Cobb angle had a significant loss when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05); the anterior height of fractured vertebra and Cobb angle in DRISF group were not significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that there was no significant difference in the remission rate of VAS score between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively (P>0.05), the recovery value of the anterior height of fractured vertebra in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group (P<0.05), the loss rate at last follow-up was also significantly higher (P<0.05); the correction rate of Cobb angle in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the loss rate of Cobb angle between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior short-segment fixation, the instrumentation of long screws in the injured vertebrae does not affect the reduction of the fracture fragments in the spinal canal. DRISF can better maintain the restored anterior height of the fractured vertebra and reduce the loss of kyphosis Cobb angle during the follow-up, indicating a better long-term effectiveness.