ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of varicose great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment alone versus combined treatment with iliac vein compression (IVC) intervention in improving lower extremity symptoms and prognosis among the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC. MethodsBased on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC treated at the Day Service Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2022 to January 2025 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the treatment strategies: the varicose GSV treatment alone group (control group) and the combined treatment group for varicose GSV and IVC (observation group). The primary endpoints included the closure rate of the GSV trunk, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study quality of life/symptom (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The significance level was set at α=0.05. ResultsA total of 264 patients with left lower extremity varicose GSV complicated by IVC were included. The observation group comprised 32 patients, while the remaining 232 patients underwent 1∶3 propensity score-matching, resulting in 96 matched patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics, including gender, age, and comorbidities, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the GSV trunk closure rate was 100% in both groups. Within-group comparisons revealed significant improvements in the VCSS and VEINES-QOL/Sym points at 6 and 12 months as compared with preoperative (on admission) values (P<0.05). Between-group comparisons showed that the observation group had greater improvement in the VEINES-QOL/Sym score at 6 months (P=0.028), but no significant difference in the VCSS (P=0.775); At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated significantly better the VCSS (P<0.001) and VEINES-QOL/Sym points (P<0.001) as compared with the control group. ConclusionsFor patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC, both treatment strategies significantly improve symptoms. Results of short-term follow-up (6 months) demonstrate early advantages in quality of life improvement with concurrent IVC intervention, while results of 12-month follow-up indicate superior efficacy in both symptom relief and quality of life enhancement. Therefore, concurrent IVC intervention may provide greater clinical benefits for mid- to long-term prognosis for patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC.
Venous pressure monitoring is an important indicator for the arteriovenous fistula evaluation. Direct static venous pressure monitoring is recognized as the most accurate way of venous pressure monitoring, which is widely used in the functional monitoring, functional evaluation of arteriovenous fistula, the diagnosis of complications and the evaluation of surgical efficacy. Venous pressure monitoring has obvious advantages and disadvantages, so it is necessary to improve relevant knowledge to correctly guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, the study of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula was summarized, in order to improve the understanding of the significance and clinical application of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate various methods and strategies of lowering central venous pressure (CVP) during hepatectomy.MethodThrough literature review, the definition, implementation, related complications, and prognosis of low CVP were reviewed and summarized and the most appropriate CVP in the liver surgery was also summarized.ResultsThe low CVP had been widely applied in the different clinical settings. Its effect of reducing hemorrhage and transfusion had been recognized. There were many techniques to intraoperatively reduce the CVP such as the volatile anesthetics, vasoactive agents, fluid restrictive strategy, inferior vena cava clamping, low tidal volume, etc. However, there was no consensus on the best strategy to reduce the CVP and there were no studies focusing on the prognosis of patients underwent the low CVP hepatectomy. Maintaining the CVP between 2.1–3 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) intraoperatively might be appropriate, once the section had been made normal hemodynamic state of the patient should be restored immediately.ConclusionsApplication of low CVP could reduce blood loss and transfusion in hepatectomy. Prognosis of patients receiving low CVP is not clear. Application of low CVP in specific population should be cautious.
Objective To explore the effect of cyclopamine （Cyc） which is the inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway on portal venous pressure of normal and liver cirrhosis rats, and it’s possible mechanisms. Moreover, to provide the experimental basis of drug efficacy and clinical treatment. Methods Thirty two healthy male SD rats were randomly average divided into four groups：normal control group, normal treatment group, liver cirrhosis control group, and liver cirrhosis treatment group. The liver cirrhosis models of rat were established by using the thioacetamide （TAA） method, which made 0.03% of TAA as the initial water concentration, and then the concentration of TAA in drinking water was adjusted according to the changes of the weekly body weight of rats lasting for twelve weeks. In thirteenth week, intraperitoneal injection of corn oil （0.1 ml/100 g body weight, 1 time/d） were performed lasting for a week in rats of the normal control group and liver cirrhosis control group; intraperitoneal injection of Cyc 〔1 mg （0.1 ml）/100 g body weight, 1 time/d〕were performed lasting for a week in rats of the normal treatment group and liver cirrhosis treatment group. In fourteenth week, the liver function, portal venous pressure （PVP）, and the ration of liver or spleen weight to body weight were detected, the expressions of α-smooth muscle actin （α-SMA） and typeⅠcollagen α1 （Col1α1） of hepatic stellate cell were detected by using immunohistochemistry. Results PVP were （10.7±0.9） and （12.3±1.3） cm H2O （1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa） in normal control group and normal treatment group, respectivly, the latter was higher than the former （t=-2.918，P=0.011）. PVP were （21.8±0.7） and （14.3±1.4） cm H2O in liver cirrhosis control group and liver cirrhosis treatment group, respectivly, the latter was lower than the former（t=13.602，P=0.000）. The expressions of α-SMA and Col1α1 in liver cirrhosis treatment group was lower than the liver cirrhosis control group. There were no significant difference of the liver function and ration of liver or spleen weight to body weight between the treatment group and the control group （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Cyclopamine could signally reduce the PVP of liver cirrhosis rats through reducing the expressions of α-SMA and Col1α1.
目的 探讨肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征的诊断和治疗方法。方法 对笔者所在医院2003年8月至2010年8月期间收治的16例肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 16例肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征患者的临床表现主要为反复发作性进食后上腹部胀痛或隐痛、呕吐且呕吐后症状可缓解（12例），恶心、反酸及嗳气（13例），饭后饱胀感或腹胀（16例），以及食欲不振（13例）。16例患者均行上消化道造影检查明确诊断；3例行腹部彩色多普勒超声检查符合诊断；4例行CT检查排除十二指肠周围占位性病变。16例患者均先行非手术治疗，其中10例患者的腹痛缓解，呕吐消失，好转出院；另6例因治疗无效而行手术治疗，其中行Treitz韧带松解加十二指肠空肠侧侧吻合术2例，行十二指肠空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术3例，行胃大部分切除、胃空肠吻合术（BillrothⅡ式）1例。术后除1例行Treitz韧带松解加十二指肠空肠侧侧吻合术的患者仍有间断腹胀伴恶心外，其余患者均痊愈。结论 肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征主要表现为上腹部胀痛、呕吐、食欲不振及消瘦，确诊依赖于上消化道造影。对其治疗首选非手术治疗，对非手术治疗无效者可采用手术治疗，其中十二指肠空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术是一种有效、易行的手术方式。
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThe clinical data of 496 patients with DVT who were treated in our hospital from January 2010 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively, to compare the time of venous pressure decreased to normal (T1) and time of circumference difference decreased to normal (T2) in patients received pure therapy (control group) and pure therapy combined with IPC (combination group), according to different types of patients in acute, sub-acute, and chronic phase. In addition, comparison of the remission rate of pulmonary embolism (PE), incidence of PE, and recurrence of DVT was performed between the control group and combination group too. Results① For DVT patients in acute stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type, peripheral type, and mixed type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis/catheter thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis/catheter thrombolysis (P<0.05). For DVT patients in sub-acute stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type and mixed type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis (P<0.05), the time of T1 of patients in peripheral type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis (P<0.01), but the time of T2 of patients in peripheral type didn't differed between patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis +IPC (P>0.05). For DVT patients in chronic stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type and mixed type didn't differed between patients who received only anticoagulant therapy and anticoagulant therapy +IPC (P>0.05); the time of T1 of patients in peripheral type who received anticoagulant therapy+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy (P<0.05), but the time of T2 didn't differed with each other (P>0.05). ② There were 63 patients in control group and 47 patients in combination group had PE before treatment. After the treatment, the PE symptom of control group relieved in 56 patients (88.89%, 56/63) and maintained in 7 patients (11.11%, 7/63), the symptom of combination group relieved in 44 patients (93.62%, 44/47) and maintained in 3 patients (6.38%, 3/47), so the remission rate of PE symptom in combination group was higher (P<0.05). There were 6 patients suffered from new PE in control group[4.26% (6/141)] and 0 in combination group[0 (0/245)] after treatment in patients who hadn't PE before treatment, and the incidence of PE was lower in combination group (P<0.05). ③ There were 325 patients were followed up for 3-36 months with the median time of 27 months, including 157 patents in control group and 168 patients in combination group. During the follow-up period, 74 patients recurred[47.13% (74/157)] in control group and 46 patients recurred[27.38% (46/168)] in combination group, and the recurrence rate was lower in combination group (P<0.05). In addition, 41 patients suffered from post-thrombotic syndrome[26.11% (41/157)] in control group and 27 patients[16.07% (27/168)] in combination group, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was lower in combination group (P<0.05). ConclusionsIPC can significantly shorten the time of venous pressure and the circumference difference decreased to normal for DVT patients in acute stage and majority DVT patients in sub-acute stage, and it can relieve the clinical symptoms of PE, reduce the incidence rate of PE and recurrence rate of DVT. Therefore, IPC is a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for DVT patients in acute stage and majority DVT patients in sub-acute stage.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and mid-to-long term outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in combination with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) followed by stent placement treatment for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complicated by iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS), and to identify risk factors relevent to primary stent restenosis. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted. The patients diagnosed with acute proximal DVT and concurrent IVCS who underwent CDT in combination with PMT followed by stent placement at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021 were included. The demographics, clinical history, and procedural data were collected. The postoperative follow-up using color Doppler ultrasound were scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The primary and secondary stent patency rates were evaluated. The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess risk factors for primary stent restenosis. ResultsA total of 188 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, underwent CDT combined with PMT and stent implantation, and completed follow-up. During the follow-up, the restenosis occurred in 26 patients. The cumulative primary patency rates at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after surgery were 100%, 98.9%, 92.5%, 88.3%, 86.7%, and 86.2%, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed that a history of previous DVT [HR (95%CI)=4.21 (1.73, 10.28), P=0.002], implantation of two or more stents [HR (95%CI)=11.85 (1.66, 84.63), P=0.014], stent crossing the inguinal ligament [HR (95%CI)=9.92 (1.87, 52.78), P=0.007], and stent length [HR (95%CI)=0.98 (0.97, 0.99), P=0.003] were the affecting factors for primary restenosis. ConclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that CDT combined with PMT and stent implantation is a safe and effective strategy for treating acute proximal DVT complicated by IVCS. Close attention should be paid to the occurrence of restenosis in patients with two or more stents, stent crossing the inguinal ligament, and a history of previous DVT.