Objective To review and evaluate the global clinical research literatures about the surgical management for prostatic abscess in the past decade, so as to provide useful information for clinical practice. Methods Based on the principles of evidence-based medicine, and the methods of bibliometrics, the PubMed database was searched from January 1st 2000 to April 10th 2011. The literatures about prostatic abscess were screened according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality was assessed, the valid data were extracted and then systematical evaluation was performed after the establishment of the database with OpenOffice.org 3.8 Calc. Results a) A total of 205 articles were found initially and 81 were finally included with the total 388 cases involved (on average, 4.79 cases per paper). The patients’ ages ranged from 10 days to 83 years old. Two studies were diagnostic tests, and all the other 79 were surgical intervention studies; b) There was no controlled clinical trail. A total of 16 studies involving more than 5 cases for each and 311 cases in all which were retrospective case analyses, all the other 65 were individual case reports; c) American scholars published 13 papers (16.5%), ranked as the first. American and European scientists published 36 papers (44.44%). Chinese scholars published quite fewer studies, of which only 2 were in English; d) The incidence increased in younger patients gradually. The pathogens included fungi and bacteria. Most bacteria were gram-positive cocci (such as Staphylococci), followed by gram-negative bacillus (such as Klebsiella). There were also some minority pathogens. The pathogens were complex and quite diverse in different districts. The predisposing factors included both regional and systematic conditions, with diabetes mellitus, hepatocirrhosis, manipulations of lower urinary tract and urinary tract infections as the common; e) The diagnostic procedures included evaluation on symptoms and signs, physical examination, identification of pathogens, and medical imaging examinations (TRUS, CT, MRI). The therapeutic options included routine managements, conservative antibiotic therapies and surgical drainages. The surgical routes were transcutaneous, transperineal, transrectal, and transurethral. The fine needle aspiration, indwelling catheter drainage, or incision and drainage were performed under the guidance of TRUS, EUS or CT through transperineal or transrectal routes. The TUR, TURP or TUIP drainages were performed through transurethral route. The failed cases of fine needle aspiration were then treated by transurethral or transperineal incision and drainages, and some patients were also treated by urinary diversion; f) The best surgical method could not be concluded for lack of controlled data; and g) Few cases died from severe complications, and the outcomes of the majority cases were good. Conclusion a) The literatures about prostatic abscess are abundant but of low quality, with all retrospective studies or individual case reports, and most are published by American and European scholars; b) The prostatic abscess affects all ages but tends to increase in the young. Most pathogens are the gram-positive cocci (such as Staphylococci) ranked as the top and followed by gram-negative bacillus (such as Klebsiella), and the pathogens are obviously diverse in different districts; c) The predisposing factors are commonly seen as diabetes mellitus, hepatocirrhosis, manipulations of lower urinary tract and urinary tract infections; ......
目的总结糖尿病并细菌性肝脓肿(DPHA)的临床特点和诊治经验。方法回顾性分析我院2002年3月至2010年12月期间出院的DPHA与无DPHA(NDPHA)患者的临床资料。结果细菌性肝脓肿患者共22例，其中DPHA患者11例。DPHA组人口学特征、临床表现、白细胞计数与NDPHA组比较差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); DPHA组血白蛋白低于NDPHA(P=0.006)，而ALT高于NDPHA(P=0.006)。DPHA组病灶个数多于NDPHA组(P=0.032)，且病灶直径也大于NDPHA组(P=0.006)。脓培养: 2组大肠杆菌均为3例; DPHA组克雷伯杆菌4例，而NDPHA组无克雷伯杆菌。DPHA组发生切口感染7例、腹腔感染2例，NDPHA组发生切口感染3例。 DPHA组抗生素使用时间、住院时间及住院费用均高于NDPHA组(Plt;0.05)。2组均分别治愈6例、好转5例，2组均无死亡患者。结论DPHA有其特殊的临床特征，并发症多，住院费用高，但预后与NDPHA差别不大。
目的 观察和评估一期手术治疗肛门直肠周围脓肿的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院2001年1月至2006年10月期间107例实施一期手术的肛门直肠周围脓肿患者的临床资料。结果 所有患者均行一次性根治手术，术后切口换药。住院时间9～28 d，平均18.5 d。术后随访3～36个月，平均19.5个月，1例术后形成瘘管，2例术后脓肿复发，此3例经再次手术治愈，无复发； 术后一次性治愈率达97.2%（104/107）。结论 一期手术治疗肛门直肠周围脓肿较单纯切开引流手术能明显地缩短术后感染控制时间，降低术后脓肿的复发率和肛瘘的发生率，减轻患者的痛苦。
Rupture is one of main complications of liver abscess. Seventy-seven patients with rupture of liver abscess are reviewed. Liver abscess may freely rupture into adjacent structures or organs or serous cavities and cause vatious complications. The causative factors of rupture of liver abscess in this series were late medical consultation in the course of the disease, delayed treatment due to misdiagnosis, and improper treatment. Measures that prevent rupture of liver abscess include raising clinical awareness of early diagnosis and timely effective drainage. The authors consider that transperitoneal surgical drainage is the best approach. Most patients with rupture of liver abscess should be treated by surgical drainage togather with transomental or transumbilital veno-catheterization for antibiotic infusion. Patients with rupture of liver abscess usually present a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. The mortality in this group was 35.1%(27/77), which is closely related to the complications of the rupture of liver abscess.
Objective To study the effect of sodium hyaluronate hydrogel in treating residual cavity on body surface after abscess drainage so as to provide new method to speed up the heal ing of residual cavity after body surface abscess drainageand reduce the frequency of dressing change and cl inic nursing workload. Methods From June 2007 to March 2008, 60 outpatients with body surface abscess drainage were randomly divided into hydrogel group (group A, 30 cases) and the control group (group B, 30 cases). In group A, there were 16 males and 14 females aged (49.5 ± 6.1) years, the disease course was (3.8 ± 0.6) days, and the volume of residual cavity was (4.19 ± 1.31) mL. In group B, there were 18 males and 12 females aged (50.2 ± 7.6) years, the disease course was (4.3 ± 0.5) days, and the volume of residual cavity was (4.04 ± 1.22) mL. There was no significant difference between two groups in gender, age, disease course and volume of residual cavity (P gt; 0.05). Residual cavity was smeared with 1 mL/cm2 sodium hyaluronate hydrogel in group A and drained by sal ine gauze in group B, the dressing was changed every two to three days. Residual cavity volume was recorded every four days, and the residual cavity volume, the frequency of out-patient dressing and the heal ing time residual of cavity were compared. Results The volume of residual cavity was (3.11 ± 1.12), (1.75 ± 0.95) and (0.55 ± 0.56) mL in group A, and was (3.39 ± 1.12), (2.64 ± 0.99) and (1.81 ± 0.81) mL in group B at 4, 8 and 12 days after treatment respectively, showing no significant differences at 4 days (P gt; 0. 05), but significant difference at 8 and 12 days (P lt; 0.01). Residual cavity heal ing time was (12.70 ± 2.78) days in group A and (20.27 ± 3.89) days in group B, and the frequency of dressing change was 5.53 ± 1.33 in group A and 9.13 ± 1.81 in group B, indicating significant differences between two groups (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion Sodium hyaluronate hydrogel can promote residual cavity heal ing, reduce the frequency of dressing change of out-patient and decrease the cl inic nursing care workload.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with suspected pyogenic liver abscess. Methods Based on the clinical questions raised by a patient with suspected pyogenic liver abscess, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1996 to January 2008), ACP Journal Club (1991 to January 2008), and Chinese Journal Full-text Database (1994 to January 2008) for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Results We did not find any systematic reviews or large-scale RCTs involving a comparison between laparoscopic drainage and surgical drainage in the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess. Four clinical retrospective studies closely related to our questions were found and assessed. These studies concluded that laparoscopic drainage for liver abscesses was a safe alternative for patients requiring surgical drainage. Based on the current evidence, as well as our clinical expertise and the patient’s values, laparoscopic drainage was not used for this patient and surgical drainage was applied. The patient was recovered and discharged. Conclusion Current evidence showed that laparoscopic drainage might be effective and safe for liver abscesses but high-quality large-scale randomized controlled trials are still required.
目的 探讨改道置管肛外引流术治疗直肠黏膜下脓肿的临床疗效。 方法 2007年5月－2012年5月，将76例直肠黏膜下脓肿患者分为改道置管肛外引流术（治疗组）和传统切开引流术（对照组）治疗，每组各38例，两组患者在年龄、性别比、病程等方面具有可比性。观察两组患者治愈时间、治愈率、随访3个月的复发情况以及肛门直肠压力测定，评价两组患者临床疗效及肛门功能保护情况。 结果 治疗组患者治愈时间为（21.3 ± 6.37）d，对照组为（29.5 ± 4.52）d，治疗组时间明显缩短（t=5.79，P＜0.01）；治疗组治愈率97.3%，对照组为73.6%，差异有统计学差异（χ2=6.81，P＜0. 01）；两组患者随访3个月的肛门功能比较，RRP治疗组为3.48 ± 0.61，对照组3.22 ± 0.79，差异无统计学意义（t=−1.61，P＞0.05）；ARP治疗组为19.05 ± 3.76，对照组为17.55 ± 3.31，差异无统计学意义（t=−1.85，P＞0.05）；ALCT治疗组为36.74 ± 4.70，对照组为37.13 ± 3.90，差异无统计学意义（t=−0.39，P＞0.05）；AMCP治疗组为24.03 ± 5.80，对照组为21.8 ± 4.91，差异无统计学意义（t=−1.61，P＞0.05）。 结论 改道置管肛外引流术治疗直肠黏膜下脓肿可缩短疗程，提高治愈率。
目的 探讨保留括约肌虚挂线法治疗高位肛周脓肿的临床疗效。 方法 2009年10月－2010年10月采用随机对照试验，对52例高位肛周脓肿患者施行手术治疗，其中保留括约肌虚挂线法（治疗组）26例，切开挂线引流法（对照组）26例。对两组患者术后6个月肛瘘发生率、切口愈合时间、术后1～15 d每晚疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和术后6个月痊愈患者肛门功能后遗症发生率进行比较。 结果 术后6个月，治疗组和对照组肛瘘发生率分别为4.0%和3.8%，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后7～15 d治疗组VAS评分均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组切口愈合时间分别为（19.05 ± 6.71）d和（21.42 ± 8.40）d，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后6个月治疗组痊愈患者肛门功能全部正常，对照组后遗症发生率为12.0%，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 保留括约肌虚挂线治疗在术后疼痛、切口愈合时间和保护肛门功能等方面明显优于切开挂线引流治疗，是一种治疗高位肛周脓肿较为理想的方法。