ObjectiveTo investigate the metastatic status and risk factors of axillary non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) in breast cancer patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), and to provide theoretical basis for exemption of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in these patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 54 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and confirmed to have 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNS) and received ALND in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery of Tongling People’s Hospital from January 2018 to April 2023. The patients were divided into NSLN metastatic group (17 cases) and NSLN non-metastatic group (37 cases) according to whether there was metastasis. Chi-square test was used to compare the basic information and clinicpathological features of the two groups. The independent risk factors for axillary NSLN metastasis were screened out by multivariate binary logistic regression model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of independent risk factors combined with axillary NSLN metastasis. Results There were 54 cases with 1–2 metastasis of SLN, 17 cases with axillary NSLN metastasis (31.5%). The incidence of axillary NSLN metastasis in patients with tumor at T1 stage (maximum diameter ≤2 cm) was only 14.3% (4/28), however, the metastatic rate of axillary NSLN in patients with tumor in T2–T3 stage (maximum diameter >2 cm) was as high as 50.0% (13/26). The axillary NSLN metastasis rate was only 21.2% (7/33) with 1 SLN metastasis, while the axillary NSLN metastasis rate was 47.6% (10/21) with 2 SLN metastasis. Univariate analysis showed that T stage (tumor diameter >2 cm), 2 SLN metastases, number of SLN >5 and tumor with vascular embolus were more likely to develop axillary NSLN metastases (P<0.05). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that T stage (tumor diameter >2 cm) and 2 SLN metastases were independent risk factors for axillary NSLN metastasis in breast cancer patients, the area under ROC curve of combined prediction of axillary NSLN metastasis by the two was 0.747, 95%CI was (0.657, 0.917), sensitivity was 0.765 and specificity was 0.649. Conclusions The combination of tumor T stage and the number of SLN metastases can better predict axillary NSLN metastasis in breast cancer patients. ALND is recommended for breast cancer patients with T stage (tumor diameter >2 cm) and 2 SLN metastases to reduce the risk of residual axillary NSLN metastasis.
Objective To explore the feasibility of breast cancer patients in China with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods A total of 328 patients who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in our hospital from 2010 to 2016 were collected retrospectively, and patients met the criteria of Z0011 clinical trials (which required no acceptance of neoadjuvant therapy, clinical tumor size was in T1/T2 stage, two or less positive SLNs were detected, received breast-conservation surgery, acceptance of whole breast radiotherapy after surgery and neoadjuvant systemic treatment) were enrolled to breast-conservation group. Patients met the criteria of Z0011 clinical trials, excepting the surgery (received non-breast-conservation surgery), were enrolled to non- breast-conservation group. Comparison of clinicopathological features between the breast-conservation group/non-breast-conservation group and the Z0011 ALND group was performed. Results Among the 328 patients, only 29 patients (8.8%) completely correspond with the results of Z0011 clinical trials. There was no statistical significance between the breast-conservation group and the Z0011 ALND group in the age, clinical T stage, expression of estrogen (ER), expression of progesterone (PR), pathological type, histological grade, number of positive lymph nodes, and incidence of non-sentinel node metastasis (P>0.05). A total of 81 patients were included in the non-breast-conservation group. It showed no statistical significance between the non-breast-conservation group and the Z0011 ALND group in expressions of ER and PR, and histological grade (P>0.05), while there was statistically significant difference in age, clinical T stage, pathological type,number of positive lymph nodes, and incidence of non-sentinel node metastasis (P<0.05). Patients in the non-breast-conservation group showed a lower age, higher percentage of lobular carcinoma and T2 stage, more positive lymph nodes, and high incidence of non-sentinel node metastasis. Conclusion It’s feasible for Z0011 clinical trials results to be used in the clinical practice of our country, but the actual situation of breast conservation in our country may lead to low adaptive population.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and advances of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) technique in breast cancer. MethodsThe pertinent domestic and overseas literatures were reviewed and the localization, harvest, status assessment, indications, and complications of SLNB were analyzed. ResultsSLNB could accurately locate and pick out sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer. The development on imaging examination and pathological techniques promoted the assessment of SLN, and the indications of SLNB were expanding. The complication rate of SLNB was low and the technique could accurately predict axillary lymph node staging and direct selective axillary lymph node dissection. ConclusionsSLNB has been an important method of surgical therapy in breast cancer, but the operation process needs to be further standardized to decrease the false negative rate. Continuative attentions shall be paid to the problems such as the false positive and controversial indications.
【摘要】 目的 探讨乳腺癌保乳切除加经乳腔镜清扫腋窝淋巴结的可行性和手术难点。 方法 将2007年2月－2011年2月行乳腺癌保乳切除手术的27例患者，分成乳腔镜腋窝清扫组（乳腔镜组）11例和常规腋窝清扫组（常规组）16例，比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中清扫淋巴结数、术后引流时间及引流量等。 结果 手术时间:乳腔镜组（186.36±11.20） min，常规组（158.13±25.29） min，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.002）；术中出血量:乳腔镜组（61.82±51.54） mL，常规组（103.75±42.56） mL，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.030）；两组术中清扫淋巴结个数、术后引流时间、引流量比较，差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）；随访1个月~4年，无一例发生肿瘤局部复发或戳孔转移。 结论 乳腺保乳切除加经乳腔镜清扫腋窝淋巴结可以安全应用于早期乳癌的保乳治疗，操作者需学习一定的手术技巧。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the feasibility and surgical difficulty of breast-conserving resection and endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients. Methods Twenty-seven patients treated by breast-conserving surgery from February 2007 to February 2011 in our hospital were divided into endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection group (the EALND group, n=11) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection group (the CALND group, n=16). Then, we compared the operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative drainage time and amount between the two groups. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the EALND group than that in the CALND group [(186.36±11.20) vs. (158.13±25.29) minutes, P=0.002]. The intra-operative bleeding volume of the EALND group was significantly less than that of the CALND group [(61.82±51.54) vs. (103.75±42.56) mL, P=0.030]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative drainage time and amount. Follow-up was done for one month to four years, during which no local recurrence or trocar displacing occurred. Conclusion The breast-conserving resection and endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection can be safely used in early breast cancer patients, and surgical skills should be mastered in the study.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current situation and progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer. MethodsDomestic and foreign documents related SLNB in breast cancer in recent years were collected to summaize some problems about the definition, indications, biopsy techniques, improvement methods of the detection rate, the pathological examinations of sentinel lymph node (SLN), the types of metastasis, clinical applications of SLNB technology in breast cancer, and so on. ResultsThe indications of SLNB were expanding. The development of the tracer, imaging examination, and pathological detection technology contributed to the status assessment of SLN in breast cancer. The operation method of SLNB in breast cancer had no uniform standards yet. There were many arguments on whether SLNB can guide axillary lymph node dissection, and the detection rate and the false negative rate of it varied widely. ConclusionsSLNB technology has became an important method in the surgical therapy of breast cancer, but the operation still needs to be further standardized. The clinical application of SLNB also needs a lot of prospective multicenter randomized experiments for further demonstration.
ObjectiveTo discuss the strategy of locoregional surgery for breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MethodThe pertinent literatures about locoregional surgery concerning breast-conserving therapy, factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, pathological shrinkage modes of breast primary tumor, and sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed. Results①The major benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was to increase the proportion of breast-conserving therapy after downstaging the primary breast tumor. However, the use of breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy might remain a higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. It was now widely recognized that the risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence were multifocal pattern of residual tumor and pathologic residual tumor larger than 2 cm. The shrinkage mode of the primary breast tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its relative factors were still unclear. 2 Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) was feasible either before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and approval by SLNB guideline and expert consensus. Patients with a cN0 status could get more benefits from SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although there was a bright future for SLNB as an alternative to ALND for patients with primary cN1 and downstaging to cN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it needed to obtain the accepted clinical identification rate, false negative rate, as well as similar regional recurrence rate and overall survival as compared to ALND. ConclusionsCurrently, surgical management is crucial for reducing the locoregional recurrence risk of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, no matter what the clinical and radiographic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is. In the era of genomics and SLNB, individual locoregional surgical management could be arrived according to the primary stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.
ObjectiveTo explore the factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis in early breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), seeking the basis for exempting some SLN-positive patients from axillary lymph node dissection. MethodsA total of 299 early breast cancer patients who were diagnosed with positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and underwent axillary lymph node dissection at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2019 to April 2023 were selected. Univariate analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors related to axillary non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis of patients with SLN positive in early breast cancer. GraphPad Prim 9.0 was used to draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under curve (AUC) of ROC was calculated to quantify the predictive value of risk factors. ResultsAmong the 299 breast cancer patients with 1-2 SLN positive, 101 cases (33.78%) were NSLN positive and 198 cases (66.22%) were NSLN negative. Univariate analysis showed that the number of positive SLN, clinical T staging and lymphovascular invasion were related to the metastasis of NSLN (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that having 2 positive SLN [OR=3.601, 95%CI (2.005, 6.470), P<0.001], clinical T2 staging [OR=4.681, 95%CI (2.633, 8.323), P<0.001], and presence lymphovascular invasion [OR=3.781, 95%CI (2.124, 6.730), P<0.001] were risk factors affecting axillary NSLN metastasis. The AUCs of the three risk factors were 0.623 3, 0.702 7 and 0.682 5, respectively, and the AUCs all were greater than 0.6, suggesting that the three risk factors had good predictive ability for NSLN metastasis. ConclusionThe number of positive SLN, clinical T staging, and lymphovascular invasion are related factors affecting NSLN metastasis in early breast cancer patients with positive SLN, and these factors have guiding significance for whether to exempt axillary lymph node dissection.
Objective To explore the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be safely exempted in younger breast cancer patients (≤40 years of age) who receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in metastasis of 1–2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) and T1–T2 stage. Methods The data of pathological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2015 in SEER database were extracted. Patients were divided into SLN biopsy group (SLNB group) and ALND group according to axillary treatment. Propensity matching score (PSM) method was used to match and equalize the clinicopathological features between two groups at 1∶1. Multivariate Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze the relationship between axillary management and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and stratified analysis was performed according to clinicopathological features. Results A total of 1 236 patients with a median age of 37 years (quartile: 34, 39 years) were included in the analysis, including 418 patients (33.8%) in the SLNB group and 818 patients (66.2%) in the ALND group. The median follow-up period was 82 months (quartile: 44, 121 months), and 111 cases (9.0%) died of breast cancer, including 33 cases (7.9%) in the SLNB group and 78 cases (9.5%) in the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS of the SLNB group and the ALND group were 90.8% and 93.4%, respectively, and the log-rank test showed no significant difference (χ2=0.70, P=0.401). After PSM, there were 406 cases in both the SLNB group and the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS rate in the ALND group was 4.1% higher than that in the SLNB group (94.8% vs. 90.7%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that ALND could further improve BCSS rate in younger breast cancer patients [HR=0.578, 95%CI (0.335, 0.998), P=0.049]. Stratified analyses showed that ALND improved BCSS in patients diagnosed before 2012 or with a character of lymph node macrometastases, histological grade G3/4, ER negative or PR negative. Conclusions It should be cautious to consider the elimination of ALND in the stage T1–T2 younger patients receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy when 1–2 SLNs positive, especially in patients with high degree of malignant tumor biological behavior or high lymph node tumor burden. Further prospective trials are needed to verify the question.