Objective To discuss the feasibil ity of repairing soft tissue defects of lower extremity with a distally based posterior tibial artery perforator cross-bridge flap or a distally based peroneal artery perforator cross-bridge flap. Methods Between August 2007 and February 2010, 15 patients with soft tissue defect of the legs or feet were treated. There were 14 males and 1 female with a mean age of 33.9 years (range, 25-48 years). The injury causes included traffic accident in 8 cases, crush injury by machine in 4 cases, and crush injury by heavy weights in 3 cases. There was a scar (22 cm × 8 cm atsize) left on the ankle after the skin graft in 1 patient (after 35 months of traffic accident). And in the other 14 patients, the defect locations were the ankle in 1 case, the upper part of the lower leg in 1 case, and the lower part of the lower leg in 12 cases; the defect sizes ranged from 8 cm × 6 cm to 26 cm × 15 cm; the mean interval from injury to admission was 14.8 days (range, 4-28 days). Defects were repaired with distally based posterior tibial artery perforator cross-bridge flaps in 9 cases and distally based peroneal artery perforator cross-bridge flaps in 6 cases, and the flap sizes ranged from 10 cm × 8 cm to 28 cm × 17 cm. The donor sites were sutured directly, but a spl it-thickness skin graft was used in the middle part. The pedicles of all flaps were cut at 5-6 weeks postoperatively. Results Distal mild congestion and partial necrosis at the edge of the skin flap occurred in 2 cases and were cured after dressing change, and the other flaps survived. After cutting the pedicles, all flaps survived, and wounds of recipient sites healed by first intention. Incisions of the donor sites healed by first intention, and skin graft survived. Fifteen patients were followed up 7-35 months with an average of 19.5 months. The color and texture of the flaps were similar to these of the reci pient site. According to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score system, the mean score was 87.3 (range, 81-92). Conclusion A distally based posterior tibial artery perforator cross-bridge flap or a distally based peronealartery perforator cross-bridge flap is an optimal alternative for the reconstruction of the serious tissue defect of ontralateral leg or foot because of no microvascular anastomosis necessary, low vascular crisis risk, and high survival rate.
Objective To investigate the operative technique and cl inical results of repairing the soft tissue defects of knee with antegrade extended peroneal artery perforator flap. Methods From October 2007 to January 2008, 3 patients (2 men and 1 woman) with the soft tissue defects of knee were treated, with the ages of 18, 31 and 42 years, respectively. The first casesustained femur and pelvis fractures and soft tissue defect over his right popl iteal fossa, which were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and debridement of knee joint 2 weeks ago. The second case was necrosis of skin 3 weeks after ORIF for fracture of tibial plateau. The third case suffered from open fracture of tibial plateau and soft tissue defect, which were treated with external fixation and debridement 3 weeks ago. The defect sizes were 16 cm × 9 cm, 11 cm × 6 cm and 14 cm × 7 cm. The flap was raised by dividing the peroneal artery and veins distally and elevating them proximally, which covered for the defects of knee. The flaps were designed with the size of 18 cm × 10 cm, 12 cm × 7 cm and 15 cm × 8 cm. The pure vascular pedicle of the flap was 10 cm to 17 cm in length, including the peroneal vessels and one or two perforator branches. The donor site is covered by a spl it thickness skin graft. Results All flaps survived after surgery. The donor sites healed by first intention and the skin grafts survived. After following up for 6, 8 and 11 months, the appearance and function of the flaps were all satisfactory. Based on the modified HSS knee performance system, post-operative knee functional outcomes of three patients were excellent. Conclusion The antegrade extended peroneal artery perforator flap suppl ied by a pure vascular pedicle can be a good alternative for reconstruction of knee. The flap, with a long and thin pure vascular pedicle, could provide good texture and contour matching the recipient area.
Objective To investigate the anatomy of anterior and posterior terminal perforators of the peroneal artery and its clinical applications. Methods Six lower limb specimens were obtained from 3 fresh cadavers. The anterior and posterior terminal perforators and the perforator of terminal peroneal artery were exposed under surgical microscope, and the distances from the beginning of each perforator branch to the lateral malleolus tip and the external diameter of each perforator were measured. With these anatomical knowledge and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidance, the pedicle flaps with above-mentioned perforators were rationally selected and precisely designed for 18 patients with skin defects in the ankle and foot region between October 2016 and December 2018. Among the patients, there were 14 males and 4 females, aged 28-62 years, with an average age of 40 years. The area of wound ranged from 4 cm×3 cm to 13 cm×10 cm and the area of skin flap ranged from 5 cm×4 cm to 14 cm×10 cm. The anterior peroneal artery terminal perforator flap were applied in 13 cases and the posterior peroneal artery terminal perforator flap in 5 cases. The donor sites were closed directly in 7 cases and repaired with full thickness skin graft in 11 cases. Results The distance from the beginning of the anterior terminal perforator to the lateral malleolus tip was (5.1±0.5) cm, the external diameter of the anterior terminal perforator was (1.51±0.05) mm. The distance from the beginning of the posterior terminal perforator to the lateral malleolus tip was (4.9±0.9) cm, the external diameter was (1.78±0.17) mm; the distance from the beginning of the perforator of terminal peroneal artery to the lateral malleolus tip was (1.7±0.7) cm, the external diameter was (0.58±0.12) mm. Clinical application results: The edge of the flap was dark in 2 cases after operation and healed after surgical dressing, and 1 case of wound infection healed gradually after debridement. The other flaps survived and healed by first intention. Three patients underwent plastic surgery at 3 months after operation due to flap swelling. All patients were followed up 3-18 months. During the follow-up period, the flaps had good texture and appearance, and partial recovery of sensation. All cases were assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at last follow-up. The results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 6 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with the excellent and good rate of 83.3%. ConclusionFurther classification of peroneal artery perforators in the lateral malleolus region can improve clinical understanding and be helpful to selection and application of perforator flaps in the lateral malleolus.
ObjectiveTo investigate clinical application of the free peroneal artery perforator flap in soft tissue defect of foot and ankle.MethodsThe clinical data of 18 patients with soft tissue defects of foot and ankle who were repaired with free peroneal artery perforator flaps between March 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 11 males and 7 females; the age ranged from 21 to 58 years, with an average age of 45 years. The defect was located in the ankle in 2 cases, in the hindfoot in 4 cases, in the midfoot in 5 cases, and in the forefoot in 7 cases. The causes of injury included 11 cases of traffic accident, 4 cases of machine injuries, 3 cases of infection and necrosis after internal fixation. The time from injury to flap repair was 12-48 days, with an average of 24 days. The range of wound was 3 cm×3 cm to 15 cm×8 cm, and the range of skin flap was 4 cm×3 cm to 16 cm×9 cm. The flap harvesting time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded; the flap survival and patient satisfaction were observed during follow-up; and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot function score was used to evaluate the foot function.ResultsThe flap harvesting time was 15-33 minutes (mean, 22 minutes); the operation time was 120-160 minutes (mean, 150 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 90-180 mL (mean, 120 mL). There were 3 cases of vascular crisis after operation, including 2 cases of arterial crisis, which survived after vascular exploration and vein graft repair; 1 case of venous crisis, partial necrosis of the skin flap, and skin grafting to cover the wound after repeated debridement. The remaining 15 skin flaps survived completely. All patients were followed up 6 months. The skin flaps were in good shape without obvious bloat. According to the AOFAS foot function score, 5 cases were excellent, 10 cases were good, and 3 cases were fair. The excellent and good rate was 83.3%.ConclusionThe free peroneal artery perforator flap is easy to harvest, the shape and size of the flap are easy to design, and it does not damage the main blood vessels of the limb. The appearance and function of the limbs are satisfactory after operation. It can be widely used in the repair of soft tissue defects of the foot and ankle.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of infrared thermography (IRT) technique assisted peroneal artery perforator flap in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects. MethodsThe clinical data of 20 patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors treated with peroneal artery perforator flap between October 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. There were 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 56.5 years (range, 32-76 years). There were 8 cases of tongue cancer, 5 cases of parotid gland cancer, 4 cases of buccal cancer, and 3 cases of mandibular gingival cancer; and 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 3 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma, and 5 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and IRT technique were performed before operation to locate the peroneal artery perforator and assist in the design of the flap. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CDU and IRT technique were compared with the actual exploration during operation. The accuracy of CDU and IRT technique in detecting the number of peroneal artery perforator and the most viable perforating points was compared. The patients were followed up regularly to observe the recovery of donor and recipient sites, the occurrence of complications, and the recurrence and metastasis of tumors. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of peroneal artery perforators detected by IRT technique before operation were 72.22%, 50.00%, 92.86%, and 16.67% respectively, which were higher than those by CDU (64.17%, 33.33%, 84.62%, and 14.29% respectively). Forty-five peroneal artery perforators were found by CDU before operation, and 35 were confirmed during operation, with an accuracy rate of 77.8%; 43 “hot spots” were found by IRT technique, and 32 peroneal artery perforators were confirmed within the “hot spots” range during operation, with an accuracy rate of 74.4%; there was no significant difference between the two methods (χ²=0.096, P=0.757). The accuracy rates of the most viable perforating points found by CDU and IRT technique were 80.95% (17/21) and 94.74% (18/19), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (χ²=0.115, P=0.734). The localization errors of CDU and IRT technique were (5.12±2.10) and (4.23±1.87) mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (t=1.416, P=0.165). All the perforator flaps survived, and the incisions of donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-18 months, with an average of 11 months. The skin flap was soft and had good blood supply, and the lower limb scar was concealed and the lower limb had good function. No lower limb swelling, pain, numbness, ankle instability, or other complications occurred, and no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found during the follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the CDU, using the IRT technique to assist the preoperative peroneal artery perforator flap design to repair the oral and maxillofacial defects has a high clinical application value.