ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis between two different fusion surgeries combined with pedicle screw fixation system. MethodsA retrospectively analysis was made on the clinical data of 98 patients with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis treated between February 2009 and May 2012. Of 98 cases, 53 underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with internal fixation (group A), and 45 underwent posterolateral fusion (PLF) with internal fixation (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segmental lesions, and degree of spondylolisthesis between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction rate of spondylolisthesis, reduction loss rate, fusion rate, intervertebral space height, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the recovery rate of JOA score were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (P<0.05). Dural tear occured in 4 cases of group A and 1 case of group B during operation; 6 cases had radicular symptoms after operation in group A; incision infection was found in 1 case of 2 groups respectively. The follow-up time was 24-36 months in group A and was 26-40 months in group B. No significant difference was found in the JOA score at preoperation and 2 weeks after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The JOA score and the recovery rate of JOA score of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 2 years after operation (P<0.05). X-ray film showed that the reduction rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B after 2 weeks of operation (P<0.05); the reduction loss rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B after 2 years after operation (P<0.05). The intervertebral space height of group A was significantly higher than that of group B at 2 weeks and 2 years after operation (P<0.05). The fusion rate of group A was significantly better than that of group B at 2 years after operation (P<0.05). ConclusionPLIF can achieve a greater degree of reduction, better restore disc height, and lumbar curvature than PLF. PLIF is superior to PLF in maintaining intervertebral height after operation. And PLIF has higher fusion rate, restores the stability of the spine in a greater extent, and it also can achieve a better long-term outcome.
目的:探讨使用Moss Miami系统经骶棘肌肌间隙入路在APERTURE工具的引导下微创治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效。方法:20例腰椎滑脱症患者(男11例,女9例),年龄30～65岁(平均40岁)。其中退变性14例、峡部裂5例、腰椎间盘突出合并钙化1例;Ⅰ度滑脱15例,Ⅱ度滑脱5例。滑脱部位:L4滑脱14例,L5滑脱6例,采用全麻俯卧位下经下腰部正中小切口(5cm),经双侧骶棘肌肌间隙入路在APERTURE工具的引导下放置Moss Miami系统进行复位固定和椎体间及后外侧植骨融合。结果:本组患者术中在C臂X光机监视,经骶棘间隙放置Moss Miami固定系统简单易行,切口较小、显露好、出血少,对骶棘肌等软组织造成的损伤轻,复位固定效果满意。术后经6月随访表明:本组患者腰腿痛等临床症状缓解,X线片显示滑脱复位无丢失、植骨融合良好、内固定器械无松动及断裂。结论:在C臂X光机监视下,采用Moss Miami经骶棘肌肌间隙入路在APERTURE工具的引导下治疗腰椎滑脱症具有切口小、肌肉软组织损伤轻、出血少、固定器械放置简单易行等优点,有利于患者术后康复。
Objective To investigate the effect of the sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis after surgical posterior intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation for low-grade isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis, and to assess the effectiveness. Methods Between October 2009 and October 2011, 30 patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent surgical posterior intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation, and the clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. There were 14 males and 16 females with an average age of 56.7 years (range, 48-67 years). The pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters, such as percentage of slipping (PS), intervertebral space height, angle of slip (AS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar junction angle (TLJ), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), spino-sacral angle (SSA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured. The functional evaluation was made using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Pearson correlation were used to investigate the association between all parameters and ODI score. Results PS, intervertebral space height, AS, and ODI were improved significantly compared with properative ones (P lt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in the other parameters between pre- and post-operation (P lt; 0.05) except TLJ and TK. The alteration of SVA showed significant correlation with the changes of PS, PI, PT, LL, SS, AS, SSA, and ODI. The alteration of SSA showed significant correlation with the changes of PS, PI, LL, SS, AS, PT, and ODI. Conclusion Surgical posterior intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis can effectively improve and maintain the spinal sagittal parameters. SVA and SSA are adequate to evaluate pre-and post-operative balance. The good clinical outcome is closely related with the improved of SVA and SSA.
Objective To investigate the technique of reduction by posterior approach for severe spondylolisthesis, and to discuss the method to prevent nerve stretch injury. Methods Between July 2007 and April 2011, 17 patients with severe spondylolisthesis underwent reduction, fixation, and fusion by posterior approach. There were 2 males and 15 females with a median age of 15 years (range, 8-67 years) and a median disease duration of 18 months (range, 5 months-16 years and 4 months). The level of spondylolisthesis was at L4 in 1 case and L5 in 16 cases; the spondylolisthesis was at degree III in 12 cases and degree IV in 5 cases according to Meyerding classification. There were 16 cases of developmental spondylolisthesis (high- dysplastic and low-dysplasia spondylolisthesis in 9 and 7 cases, respectively) and 1 case of traumatic spondylolisthesis; 16 cases of developmental spondylolisthesis at L5 level included 6 cases of type 4, 9 case of type 5, and 1 case of type 6 according to Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification. All cases underwent posterior spinal decompression, Schanz screw fixation for the slipped vertebrae, the intervertebral and posterolateral fusion and reduction of the slipped vertebrae, and correction of the lumbosacral kyphosis. The reductive degree of slipped vertebrae was modulated according to the strain of exiting spinal root. The slip degree should be reduced within Meyerding degree II. The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of whole spine were taken in a standardized standing position to observe the correction of displacement severity and lumbosacral angle. The nerve function and pain score of lower extremity were evaluated by neurological Frankel grade and visual analogue scale (VAS). Bony fusion was assessed by followed-up CT three-dimentional reconstruction. Results Exiting nerve root paralysis occurred in 1 case after operation, and released at 4 weeks after operation; no aggravation of nerve damage was observed in the other patients. The incisions primarily healed. All the patients were followed up 12-48 months (mean, 25 months). The slip percentage, the lumbosacral angle, and VAS score of lower extremity were improved from 72% ± 10%, (18.2 ± 3.5)°, and 7.0 ± 1.5 at preoperation to 12% ± 6%, ( — 7.3 ± 2.9)°, and 1.5 ± 1.3 at 12 months after operation respectively, all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). Osteosynthesis was seen at the bone grafting area by CT three-dimentional reconstruction at 12 months after operation. No breakage of screw and rod or reduction loss occurred. Conclusion It can obtain satisfactory clinical result to use spinal canal decompression by posterior approach, the Schanz screw fixation of the slipped vertebrae, the intervertebral and posterolateral fusion for severe spondylolisthesis. The risk of nerve stretch injury can be prevented by choosing the lowest height of intervertebral cage, modulating the reductive degree of slipped vertebrae according to the strain of exiting spinal root, and correcting lumbosacral kyphosis.
Objective To investigate the relationship between the volume of bone-graft and fusion efficacy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion and internal fixation of spondylolisthesis. Methods Between May 2004 and June 2007, 79 patients with spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the volume of bone-graft for interbody fusion: group A (n=27), 5 bone granules/ cm3 on average; group B (n=26), 11 bone granules/cm3 on average; and group C (n=26), 25 bone granules/cm3 on average. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, affected segment, and the degree of vertebral slip among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). The volume of bone-graft, the fusion rate, the loss of intervertebral height, and the incidence of internal fixation failure were compared among 3 groups. Results All cases were followed up 24-43 months (mean, 35 months). There were significant differences in volume of bone-graft among 3 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in total volume of bone-graft and Cage height among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain at last follow-up were significantly decreased when compared with preoperative scores in 3 groups (P lt; 0.05); but no significant difference was found among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). The fusion rate was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C, and in group A than in group C at 1 and 2 years after operation (P lt; 0.05). The change values of the intervertebral height were (2.2 ± 1.4), (0.8 ± 1.3), and (2.3 ± 1.6) mm respectively in groups A, B, and C; it was significantly lower in group B than in groups A and C (P lt; 0.05). The degree of vertebral slip at immediately after operation and last follow-up was significantly improved when compared with preoperative one in 3 groups (P lt; 0.05); the loss of vertebral slip in group B was significantly lower than that in groups A and C at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05). After operation, nail breaking occurred in 1 case (3.7%) of group C at 1 year, depinning in 1 case (3.8%) of group A at 2 years, and no nail breaking or depinning in group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of internal fixation failure among 3 groups (χ2=3.950, P=0.604). Conclusion The application of bone-graft with middle volume (11 bone granules/cm3 on average) in internal fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion has a good imageology outcome, which can increase the fusion rate and decrease the loss of intervertebral height.
Objective To analyze the clinical features and preliminary outcome of posterior operation for traumatic lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods The clinical data of 11 patients with traumatic lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent surgeries between January 2008 and June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 male and 5 female patients, aged from 13 to 60 years with a median age of 38 years. The mechanism of injury included heavy pressure injury in 4 cases, falling injury from height in 4 cases, and traffic accident injury in 3 cases. The time of injury to operation was between 3 days and 13 years (median, 20 days). According to Frankel neurological function grading, 2 patients were rated as grade E, 4 as grade D, 3 as grade C, and 2 as grade B before operation; according to Meyerding spondylolisthesis grading, 4 cases were classified as degree I, 4 as degree II, 2 as degree III, and 1 as degree IV preoperatively. The affected segments included L4 in 3 and L5 in 8 patients. The surgical fixation segments were L4, 5 in 2 patients, L5, S1 in 7, and L4-S1 in 2. Eight patients underwent circumferential fusion, while 3 patients underwent posterolateral fusion. The reduction of spondylolisthesis and bone graft fusion were assessed on X-ray films and three-dimensional CT scans during follow-up. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. Results All patients achieved primary healing of incision after operation. And all patients were followed up 6-40 months with a median time of 12 months. There was no pulling-out or breaking of internal fixation. The fusion rate was 100% on three-dimensional CT scans, and the fusion time was 3-6 months (mean, 4.5 months). The spondylolisthesis was degree 0 in 10 cases and degree I in 1 case according to Meyerding grading, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative spondylolisthesis grading (Z= — 2.979, P=0.003). The Frankel neurological function grading were E in 6, D in 3, and C in 2 at last follow-up, which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (Z= — 2.271, P=0.014). At 1 week after operation and last follow-up, VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05); however, no significant difference was found between at 1 week and at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion If lumbar X-ray films suggest multiple fractures of transverses in emergency combined with the mechanism of injury, it bly indicates the diagnosis of traumatic lumbar spondylolisthesis, moreover earlier decompression and fusion can provide the recovering of the neurological function and satisfactory preliminary effectiveness in these patients.
To analyze the effectiveness of posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbodyfusion in treating lumbar spondylol isthesis. Methods Between January 2005 and January 2009, 26 patients with lumbar spondylol isthesis underwent posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion, including 11 males and 15 females with an average age of 56.8 years (range, 36-73 years). The disease duration was 7 months to 11 years. The affected lumbars were L3 in 3 cases, L4 in 12 cases, and L5 in 11 cases. According to the Meyerding evaluating system, 21 cases were classified as degree III, 5 cases as degree III-IV, and 1 case as degree IV. The cl inical results were investigated by measuring radiographic measurements, including Taillard index, Boxall index, sl i pping angle, lumbar lordosis angle,and intervertebral height index preoperatively, immediately, 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. SUK’s criteria was used to judge bone graft fusion. Results Primary heal ing of the incisions was achieved in all cases. Allpatients were followed up 25.8 months on average (range, 10-51 months). There were significant differences in Taillardindex, Boxall index, sl i pping angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and intervertebral height index between preoperatively andimmediately, 2 weeks, 3 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Bone graft fusion was achieved at 3-8 months after operation(mean, 3.5 months); and the fusion rate was 100%. According to Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring, theresults were excellent in 17 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case; and the excellent and good rate was 92.3%. Compl ications occurred in 2 cases, including nail or rod breakage and nerve injury, and they were cured aftertreatment. Conclusion Posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion treating lumbar vertebralspondylol isthesis can afford sol id internal fixation and achieve a satisfactory reduction, so it maybe an ideal procedure and a worthy recommended method for treating lumbar spondylol isthesis.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of expandable pedicle screw (EPS) combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From June 2004 to March 2008, 23 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesiswere treated, including 9 males and 14 females aged 24-72 years old (average 48.7 years old). The course of the disease varied from 6 months to 6 years (average 30.4 months). There were 18 cases of degenerative spondylol isthesis and 5 of isthmic spondylolisthesis, including 1 case at L3,4 level, 14 at L4,5 level, and 8 at L5 and S1 levels. There were 17 cases of grade I, 4 of grade II, and 2 of grade III (including 1 case of recurrent L5 spondylolysis) according to Meyerding classification system. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed using 48 PLIVIOS interbody fusion cages, and spondylolisthesis reduction and internal fixation were conducted using 84 pieces of EPS. The indications for use of EPS were initial operation with bone mass reduction or osteoporosis, reoperation of previous pedicle instrumentation, intraoperative screw relocation, sacral anchoring, and construct reinforcement. Cl inical outcomes, radiographic reduction of spondylol isthesis and bone fusion of lumbar interbody were evaluated based on JOA score, Boxall index, and Cook criteria. Results The incision healed by first intension in all cases except for one revision case that suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and obtained delayed-healing without infection 23 days after operation using conservative treatment. No operative compl ications such as nerve and organ injuries were found.All cases were followed up for 12-39 months (average 17.8 months). X-ray exams of spine AP, lateral, fully extended position and fully flexed position view showed all 84 EPS were fully expanded within vertebral body. The improvement rate of JOA at the final follow-up visit was markedly effective in 14 cases, and effective in 5 cases, and noneffective in 4 cases, with a total effective rate of 82.61%. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 14 cases, improvement was obtained in 6 cases, no improvement was observed in 3 cases, and the reduction rate was 86.69%. Lumber interbody fusion was achieved in 20 cases, fixation was achieved in 2 cases, failure was observed in 1 cases, and the fusion rate was 86.69%. Conclusion EPS in complex with interbody fusion cage provides effective reduction, internal fixation and interbody fusion for the reconstruction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.