目的:观察丙泊酚静脉泵注复合腰硬联合麻醉于剖宫产术中的可行性及安全性。方法:50例ASA I~II级行择期剖宫产术产妇,于L2-3行腰硬联合麻醉,确定麻醉平面为T4-6,取出胎儿后静脉缓推丙泊酚1mg/kg,然后2~4mg·kg-1·h-1静脉泵入,连续监测平均动脉压,心率,血氧饱和度,呼吸频率。结果:腰硬联合麻醉及静脉推注负荷剂量丙泊酚后平均动脉压降低,但无临床意义。余心率,氧饱和度,呼吸频率各时点无统计学差异。结论:丙泊酚复合腰硬联合麻醉用于剖宫产术患者生命体征平稳,镇静效果良好。
摘要:目的: 观察腰硬联合麻醉在前列腺电切术患者中的临床应用效果。 方法 : 76例经尿道前列腺电切术患者(78±7岁)随机均分为腰硬联合麻醉组(C组)及硬膜外组(E组)。C组以腰硬联合穿刺针于L34穿刺至蛛网膜下腔后,注入05%布比卡因2 mL,通过硬膜外穿刺针置入硬膜外导管;E组行L34间隙硬膜外穿刺置管。记录麻醉起效时间、麻醉效果、麻醉前及麻醉后5、15、30分钟时血压、心率。 结果 : 所有患者均穿刺顺利,麻醉起效时间C组为36±13 min, E组68±15 min;C组麻醉效果完善率为100%,E组为95%;麻醉后两组血压均下降(〖WTBX〗P lt;005),但降幅均未超过基础值的20%;两组麻醉前及麻醉后血压、心率均无显著性差异。 结论 :腰硬联合麻醉用于前列腺电切术具有起效快、麻醉效果佳的优点。Abstract: Objective: To investigate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combined spinalepidural(CSEA) and epidural(EA) anesthesia on elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP). Methods : 76 patients(78±7 years) suffering TURP were divided into two group: group CSEA(38cases) and groupEA(38 cases). The dose of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia is 10 mg. Blood pressure(BP), heart rate(HR) and anesthesia efficacy were observed before anesthesia, 5, 15 and 30min after anesthesia. Results : BP decreased after anesthesia in two groups than before anesthesia(〖WTBX〗P lt;005). The decreases of BP were less than 20% of basises. There were no significant differents of BP and HR between two groups before and after anesthesia. Conclusion :CSEA with bupivacaine 10 mg is safe and efficient in elderly undergoing TURP.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for randomized controlled trials on combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section up to October 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2.9 software. ResultsA total of 9 studies containing 616 delivery women were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with epidural anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was superior in the time of sensory blockade to T4 (MD=-7.38, 95%CI-9.54 to-5.23, P < 0.000 01), muscle relaxation (OR=6.09, 95%CI 2.65 to 13.97, P < 0.000 1), and recovery of motor block (MD=-41.57, 95%CI-58.98 to-24.17, P < 0.000 01). Compare with spinal anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was superior in lowering the incidence of low blood pressure (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.81, P=0.006). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia could increase the effectiveness and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
Objective To discuss the effect of continuous phenylephrine infusion and single-dose phenylephrine injection on puerpera undergoing spinal and epidural combined anesthesia and the infant outcomes. Methods A total of 50 patients scheduled for selective cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia were selected as the study subjects between July 2015 and June 2016. They were randomly allocated into two groups with 25 in each. Group CII underwent continuous phenylephrine infusion [0.5 μg/(kg·min)] immediately after anesthesia to adjust the blood pressure, while group CON accepted single-dose phenylephrine injection (50 μg) after anesthesia when systolic pressure was lower than 90 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) or when the decrease of mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher than 20% of the base value. The infusion of phenylephrine was stopped after the fetus was taken out. MAP, cardiac output, cardiac index (CI) at the time when the patient went into the delivery room (T1), before anesthesia (T2), 1 minute after anesthesia (T3), 3 minutes after anesthesia (T4), 10 minutes after anesthesia (T5), and delivery (T6) were recorded. Blood gas analysis of fetal umbilical arterial blood was carried out and neonatal Apgar score was recorded. Results Hemodynamics was more stable in group CII compared with group CON. Heart rate at T4 and T5, and cardiac output at T5 and T6 in group CON were significantly lower than those in group CII (P<0.05). The neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH value, base excess and HCO3－ were all significantly lower, while partial pressure of carbon dioxide was significantly higher in group CON than group CII (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with single-dose phenylephrine injection, continuous phenylephrine infusion has more stable hemodynamics, and exert less effect on maternal and infant outcomes for patients undergoing cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.