ObjectiveTo compare the surgical efficacy of Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsOnline databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM from inception to 18 February, 2022 were searched by two researchers independently. The references of related studies were also searched to re-enroll the potential studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Results A total of 43 studies including 33 089 patients were enrolled in the final study. The NOS scores of the included studies were ≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that the operation time was longer [MD=8.50, 95%CI (1.59, 15.41), P=0.020], the blood loss was less [MD=−46.58, 95%CI (−62.86, −30.29), P＜0.001], the dissected lymph nodes stations were more [MD=0.67, 95%CI (0.40, 0.93), P＜0.001], the dissected lymph nodes were more [MD=2.39, 95%CI (1.43, 3.36), P＜0.001], the conversion rate was lower [OR=0.52, 95%CI (0.46, 0.59), P＜0.001], the time of chest tube drainage was shorter [MD=−0.35, 95%CI (−0.58, −0.11), P=0.004], the length of hospital stay was shorter [MD=−0.32, 95%CI (−0.45, −0.19), P＜0.001], and the recurrence rate was lower [OR=0.51, 95%CI (0.36, 0.72), P＜0.001] in the RATS group than those in the VATS group. The rate of overall postoperative complications [OR=0.95, 95%CI (0.89, 1.01), P=0.110] and postoperative mortality rate [OR=0.85, 95%CI (0.62, 1.16), P=0.300] were not significantly different between the two groups. ConclusionCompared with VATS, although RATS prolongs the operation time, it does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality rates. Moreover, RATS can dissect more lymph nodes, effectively control intraoperative bleeding, shorten the duration of chest drainage tube indwelling and shorten the postoperative hospital stay to a certain extent.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate of the difference in clinical outcomes between Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for mediastinal tumor resection. MethodsOnline databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched by two researchers independently from inception to October 10, 2022. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. ResultsA total of 23 studies with 5 646 patients were enrolled in the final study. The NOS scores of the studies were≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the VATS group, the blood loss was less [MD=−18.11, 95%CI (−26.12, −10.09), P＜0.001], time of postoperative drainage tube retention [MD=−0.79, 95%CI (−1.09, −0.49), P＜0.001] and postoperative hospitalization time [MD=−1.00, 95%CI (−1.36, −0.64), P＜0.001] were shorter, postoperative day 1 drainage [MD=−5.53, 95%CI (−9.94, −1.12), P=0.010] and total postoperative drainage [MD=−88.41, 95%CI (−140.85, −35.97), P=0.001] were less, the rates of postoperative complications [OR=0.66, 95%CI (0.46, 0.94), P=0.020] and conversion to thoracotomy [OR=0.32, 95%CI (0.19, 0.53), P＜0.001] were lower, and the hospitalization costs were higher [MD=2.60, 95%CI (1.40, 3.79), P＜0.001] in the RATS group. The operative time was not statistically different between the two groups [MD=5.94, 95%CI (−1.45, 13.34), P=0.120]. ConclusionRATS mediastinal tumor resection has a high safety profile. Compared with VATS, patients have less intraoperative blood loss, a lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy, and shorter postoperative tube time and hospital stay, which is more conducive to rapid postoperative recovery.
Objective To systematically evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes between subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SVATS) and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (IVATS) for anterior mediastinal tumor resection. Methods Online databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Sinomed, CNKI, Wanfang from inception to December 19, 2022 were searched by two researchers independently for literature comparing the clinical efficacy of SVATS and IVATS in treating anterior mediastinal tumors. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted relevant data. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. ResultsA total of 12 studies with 1 517 patients were enrolled. NOS score≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the IVATS, SVATS had less blood loss (MD=−17.76, 95%CI −34.21 to −1.31, P=0.030), less total postoperative drainage volume (MD=−70.46, 95%CI −118.88 to −22.03, P=0.004), shorter duration of postoperative drainage tube retention (MD=−0.84, 95%CI −1.57 to −0.10, P=0.030), lower rate of postoperative lung infections (OR=0.33, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.70, P=0.004), lower postoperative 24 h VAS pain score (MD=−1.95, 95%CI −2.64 to −1.25, P＜0.001) and 72 h VAS pain score (MD=−1.76, 95%CI −2.55 to −0.97, P＜0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD=−1.12, 95%CI −1.80 to −0.45, P=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the operation time, the incidence of postoperative complications, incidence of postoperative phrenic nerve palsy or incidence of postoperative arrhythmia (P＞0.05). ConclusionSVATS for the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors has high safety. Compared with the IVATS, the patients have less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, lower risk of postoperative pulmonary infection, less postoperative short-term pain, and shorter postoperative catheter duration and hospital stay, which is more conducive to rapid postoperative recovery.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive lung segment resection and lobectomy resection for stageⅠA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in order to provide reference for clinical application. MethodsOnline databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched from inception to January 21, 2023 by two researchers independently. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The prognostic indicators included the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0. ResultsA total of 13 studies with 1 853 patients were enrolled in the final study, with NOS scores≥7 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the MILLR group, the blood loss was less [SMD=−0.36, 95%CI (−0.49, −0.23), P<0.001], postoperative drainage tube retention time [SMD=−0.34, 95%CI (−0.62, −0.05), P=0.019] and hospitalization time [SMD=−0.28, 95%CI (−0.40, −0.15), P<0.001] were shorter in the MILSR group. More lymph nodes [SMD=−0.65, 95%CI (−0.78, −0.53), P<0.001] and shorter operation time [SMD=0.20, 95%CI (0.07, 0.33), P=0.003] were found in the MILLR group. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative recurrence rate, OS, DFS or RFS between the two groups. Conclusion Although the number of lymph nodes removed by MILSR is limited compared with MILLR, it does not affect the prognosis. MILSR has advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening postoperative drainage tube retention time and hospital stay. For the surgical treatment of stageⅠA NSCLC, MILSR may be a more appropriate surgical approach.
目的 总结达芬奇机器人手术系统在胸外科的应用体验。 方法 回顾性分析 2016 年 1～11 月我院胸外科行肺叶切除和纵隔肿瘤切除 33 例患者的临床资料，其中男 24 例、女 9 例，年龄 51.3（22～76）岁。肺叶切除 18 例，肺楔形切除+肺段切除 11 例，纵隔肿瘤切除 4 例。分别对患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数、中转开胸数、严重并发症（包括特发性急性肺损伤、呼吸衰竭、支气管胸膜瘘）、术中死亡人数等指标进行数据处理分析。 结果 33 例患者肺叶切除 18 例，术后病理证实为恶性肿瘤 9 例，肺结核 5 例，支气管扩张症 4 例；肺楔形切除+肺段切除 11 例，术后病理证实为结核球 8 例，良性结节 3 例。肺部疾病手术时间 90～210（130.7±50.6）min，淋巴结清扫 6～28（18.0±12.2）枚，纵隔肿瘤手术时间 60～90（78.3±32.9）min。所有患者均顺利完成手术，无严重并发症（特发性急性肺损伤、呼吸衰竭、支气管胸膜瘘），无中转开胸。 结论 达芬奇 Si 系统使微创技术有了新的生命力，为微创手术技术的进一步发展提供了可能。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the curative effect of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for early stage lung cancer patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients with radical resection of lung cancer in Gansu Provincial Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: 43 patients in a VATS group and 37 in a RATS group. There were 51 males and 29 females. Data were processed with STATA v14.0 statistical software.ResultsThere were significant differences in the operative time, duration of hospital stay and operative costs between the two groups. In the RATS group, operative duration was longer (172.21 minutes versus 162.20 minutes, P=0.018), cost was higher (74 076.69 yuan versus 54 814.73 yuan, P<0.001), and required significantly shorter hospital stay (8.27 days versus 10.76 days, P=0.001) compared with those of the VATS group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of conversion (3 versus 0, P=0.144), blood loss during operation (61.29 ml versus 90.63 ml, P=0.213), dissected lymph node number (17.38 versus 12.63, P=0.095), drainage volume (1 406.76 ml versus 1 514.60 ml, P=0.617) and the drainage time (7.92 days versus 7.20 days, P=0.440).ConclusionIn the early lung cancer patients who underwent thoracic surgery, the postoperative hospitalization time of the RATS group is shorter than that of the VATS group, and the operation time is longer than that of the VATS group. The other short-term surgical indexes are similar to those of thoracoscopic surgery. However, the robot has great advantages in the treatment of patients with difficult lymph node dissection, serious pleural adhesion and complicated anatomical relationship.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of Toumai® minimally invasive endoscopic robot in thoracic surgery, and to observe its safety and short-term surgical efficacy. MethodsThree patients were enrolled from October to December 2021, including 1 male (69 years) and 2 females (47 years and 22 years). All 3 patients received surgery with Toumai® endoscopic surgical robot, including radical lung cancer surgery in 2 patients and mediastinal tumor resection in 1 patient. ResultsAll 3 patients were successfully operated without conversion to thoracotomy, complication or death. For the male lobectomy patient, the total operation time was 120 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL, the catheter drainage time was 4 days and the hospital stay time was 5 days. For the female lobectomy patient, the total operation time was 103 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL, the catheter drainage time was 4 days and the hospital stay time was 5 days. For the female mediastinal tumor patient, the total operation time was 81 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 50 mL, the catheter drainage time was 3 days and the hospital stay time was 3 days. ConclusionThe Toumai® minimally invasive endoscopic surgical robot is safe and effective in thoracic surgery. Compared with Da Vinci surgical robot, Toumai® has the same 3D visual field experience and smooth operation.
Objective To systematically review the sex differences in efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods We conducted a computer search of Medline, The Cochrane Library, and EMbase from inception to November 2022 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC patients. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results Finally 16 RCTs with a total of 9 653 patients were included, and all were evaluated as high-quality literature using the modified Jadad scale. Meta-analysis results showed that in female NSCLC patients receiving immune therapy, the median overall survival (OS) [HR=0.72, 95%CI(0.61, 0.85), P<0.001] was longer than in males [HR=0.73, 95%CI(0.69, 0.78), P=0.401]. Males [HR=0.64, 95%CI(0.58, 0.71), P=0.171] had an advantage over females [HR=0.76, 95%CI(0.57, 1.03), P<0.001] in median progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusion Females receiving ICIs have immunotherapeutic advantages in terms of median OS compared to males, while males are more likely to benefit statistically in terms of median PFS than females.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsTo collect clinical randomized controlled trials of ICIs for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC, computer searches were conducted on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and EMbase databases. The search time frame was inception to January 2023. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software. ResultsTwelve clinical studies were included, all of which were assessed as high-quality literature with a total of 7 121 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ICIs significantly improved median overall survival (OS) (HR=0.72, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.80, P < 0.000 01), prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.65, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.78, P<0.000 01), and improved objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.52, 95%CI 1.28 to 1.79, P<0.000 01), compared to chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed that the ICIs combination therapy group significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR in NSCLC patients compared to the ICIs monotherapy group. In terms of safety, the ICIs group had a lower risk of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade and grade 3-5 TRAEs than the chemotherapy group. However, the ICIs group had a higher incidence of TRAEs leading to treatment cessation than the chemotherapy group. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of any grade TRAEs, grade 3-5 TRAEs, leading to treatment discontinuation TRAEs was higher in the immune combination therapy group than in the immune monotherapy group. ConclusionThe first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ICIs inhibitors significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR compared to chemotherapy. Immune-combination chemotherapy significantly improved the outcomes of NSCLC patients, compared to immune monotherapy, but patients were at a higher risk of TRAEs.
Objective To systematically evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of McKeown and Sweet methods in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and China General Library of Biomedical Literature were searched for literature on the short-term efficacy and safety of McKeown and Sweet methods in the treatment of esophageal cancer published from the establishment to May 2023. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of researches, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4. Results A total of 9 articles were included, involving 3687 patients including 1019 in the McKeown group and 2668 in the Sweet group. NOS score was 8-9 points. There were no statistical differences in the age, sex or American Joint Committee on Cancer stage between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in the McKeown group had longer operative time and hospital stay, more intraoperative blood loss, and higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores than those in the Sweet group (P<0.05). However, the McKeown operation could remove more lymph nodes. In terms of safety, the incidences of pulmonary complications [OR=2.20, 95%CI (1.40, 3.46), P＜0.001] and postoperative anastomotic leakage [OR=2.06, 95%CI (1.45, 2.92), P＜0.001] were higher in the McKeown group than those in the Sweet group. In addition, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in the Karnofsky score, cardiac complications, vocal cord injury or paralysis, chylous leakage, or gastric emptying (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with McKeown, Sweet method has advantages in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay, and had lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage. However, McKeown has more lymph node dissection.