west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "萧正伦" 2 results
  • 血浆置换辅助重症肌无力危象患者撤机的观察

    目的 回顾血浆置换辅助治疗重症肌无力危象伴撤机困难患者的疗效。方法 选择2000 ~2005 年因撤机困难入住广州呼吸疾病研究所ICU的重症肌无力患者11 例, 均需有创呼吸机辅助通气。其中接受了血浆置换( PE) 治疗7 例, 称PE 组; 仅接受常规治疗4 例, 称对照组。比较两组患者的住院天数、总通气天数、ICU 天数、用PE 前( 后) 的机械通气天数, 以及PE 前和撤机时的许氏临床相对评分。结果 血浆置换组用PE 前的通气天数( 19. 7 ±21. 3) d, 接受PE 后的通气天数为( 2. 57 ±5. 94) d, 总通气天数( 27 ±23) d; 对照组的总通气天数( 26 ±22) d, 两组的住院天数、总通气天数、ICU 天数均无显著差异。PE 组治疗前许氏绝对评分平均为44 分,4 次PE 治疗后许氏绝对评分平均为18 分, 相对计分为0. 59。结论 对这类撤机困难的重症肌无力危象患者应用PE 治疗4 次后, 在不增加治疗总费用的前提下, 能在较短时间内协助患者尽快撤机; 对急性呼吸衰竭机械通气的重症肌无力患者, 在综合治疗前提下, 机械通气7 d 以上仍难以撤机者, 可考虑应用血浆置换。

    Release date:2016-09-14 11:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Noninvasive Ventilation for Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

    Objective To investigate the effects of noninvasive ventilation for the treatment of acute respiratory failure secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS) . Methods 127 patients with complete information were collected from the database of SARS in Guangdong province, who were all consistent with the ALI/ARDS diagnostic criteria. The patients were divided into three groups depending on ventilation status, ie. a no-ventilation group, a noninvasive ventilation group, and a mechanical ventilation group. The outcome of ventilation treatmentwas followed up.Multi-factor regression analysis was conducted to analyze the relations of ventilation treatment with ARDS and mortality, and factors associated with success of noninvasive ventilation. Results As soon as the patients met the diagnostic criteria of ALI/ARDS, the patients in the noninvasive ventilation group were in more serious condition and had a higher proportion of ARDS compared with the no-ventilation group ( P lt;0. 01) . The patients in the mechanical ventilation group had a higher mortality rate ( P lt;0.01) . 6 and 7 patients in the no-ventilation group had noninvasive ventilation and invasive ventilation thereafter, respectively. 15 patients in the noninvasive group switched to invasive ventilation. Compared with the patients without ventilation ( n =45) , the patients receiving noninvasive ventilation ( n = 61) were in more serious condition and at higher risk of developing ARDS ( P lt;0. 01) , but the mortality was not different between them ( P gt; 0. 05) . The patients who continued to receive noninvasive ventilation ( n = 40) were in more serious condition, and at higher risk of developing ARDS compared with the patients without ventilation ( n = 45) ( P lt; 0. 01) . 15 patients in the noninvasive group who switched to invasive ventilation were older than those patients continuing noninvasive ventilation.Conclusions For SARS patients fulfilling the ALI/ARDS criteria, the patients underwent noninvasive ventilation are more severe, run a higher probability of developing ARDS from ALI. But earlier initiation of noninvasive ventilation has no impact on mortality. The patients who tolerate noninvasive ventilation can avoid intubation, especially for young patients. However, the time and indication of shifting from noninvasive ventilation to invasive ventilation should be emphasized.

    Release date:2016-08-30 11:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content