Objective To retrospectively review the clinical experience and early surgical results of combined cardiac valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG）. Methods From Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2005, combined valve surgery and CABG was performed in 81 patients. 37 patients were rheumatic heart disease with coronary stenosis, and 44 patients were coronary artery disease with valvular dysfunction. Single vessel disease was in 18 patients, two vessels disease in 9 and triple-vessel disease in 54. All the patients received sternotomy and combined valve surgery and CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass. Mitral valve repair and CABG were done in 26 patients. Valve replacement and CABG were done in 55 patients with 49 mechanical valves and 16 tissue valves. Four patients had left ventricular aneurysm resection concomitantly. The number of distal anastomosis was 3.12 5= 1.51 with 66 left internal mammary arteries bypassed to left anterior descending. Post-operative intra-aortic balloon pump was required in 4 cases for low cardiac output syndrome. Results Two patients died of low cardiac output syndrome with multiple organs failure. 79 patients had smooth recovery and discharged from hospital with improved heart function. 64 patients had completed follow-up with 5 late non cardiac related death in a mean follow-up period of 14.2 months. Conclusion Combined one stage valve surgery and CABG is effective with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
Abstracts： Objective To summarize clinical experience and surgical outcomes of congenital coronary arterial fistula （CAF）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of 12 patients （6 males, 6 females）, aged from 4 to 77 （50.90±23.8） years, who underwent surgical repair of CAF in Nanjing First Hospital between February 2005 and June 2011. There were 3 CAF patients associated with coronary artery aneurysms, one with patent foramen ovale and 2 with coronary artery disease （CAD）. One CAD patient had concomitant severe aortic valve stenosis. One patient underwent surgical repair without cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB） and 11 patients underwent surgery under CPB, among whom 3 patients underwent surgery with beating heart. One patient underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting.?Results?All the patients recovered uneventfully. Operation time was 151.25±42.65 min （ranging from 90 to 245 min）, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 65.06±29.16 min （ranging from 31 to 116 min）, mean aortic cross-clamping time was 43.00±33.41 min （ranging from 18 to 97 min） and postoperative hospital stay was 12.50±1.45 d （ranging from 10 to 15 d）. There was no early or late death. All the patients were followed up from 4 months to 6 years and no patient had symptom recurrence, myocardial ischemia or residual fistula during the follow-up. Conclusions All CAF patients should be surgically treated once diagnosis are made with satisfactory surgical outcome.
ObjectiveTo compare early outcomes of the minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) through right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (ALMT) with conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS), and evaluate feasibility and safety of MIMVS. MethodsFrom January 2011 to December 2013, 120 patients undergoing elective MVS in Nanjing First Hospital were prospectively enrolled in this study. There were 72 male and 48 female patients with their age of 22-71 (42.4±11.0) years. Using a random number table, all the patients were randomly divided into a portaccess MIMVS group (MIMVS group, n=60) and a conventional MVS group (conventional group, n=60). MIMVS group patients received port-access cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) establishment via femoral artery, femoral vein and right internal jugular vein cannulation through right ALMT 5-6 cm in length. Special MIMVS operative instruments were used for mitral valve repair or replacement. Conventional group patients received mitral valve repair or replacement under conventional CPB through median sternotomy. Perioperative clinical data, morbidity and mortality were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThere was no death in-hospital or shortly after discharge in this study. CPB time (98.0±26.0 minutes vs. 63.0±21.0 minutes) and aortic cross-clamping time (68.0±9.0 minutes vs.37.0±6.0 minutes) of MIMVS group were significantly longer than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Postoperative mechanical ventilation time (6.0±3.9 hours vs. 11.2±5.6 hours), length of ICU stay (18.5±3.0 hours vs. 28.6±9.5 hours) and postoperative hospital stay (8.0±2.0 days vs. 13.5±2.5 days) of MIMVS group were significantly shorter than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Chest drainage volume within postoperative 12 hours (110.0±30.0 ml vs. 385.0±95.0 ml) and the percentage of patients receiving blood transfusion (25.0% vs. 58.3%) of MIMVS group were significantly lower than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Patients were followed up for 1-24 months, and the follow-up rate was 94.2%. There was no statistical difference in postoperative morbidity or mortality between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionMIMVS through right ALMT is a safe and feasible procedure for surgical treatment of mitral valve diseases. MIMVS can achieve similar clinical outcomes as conventional MVS, but can significantly shorten postoperative ICU stay and hospital stay, reduce blood transfusion, and is a good alternative to conventional MVS.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience in the treatment of Carpentier's type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation through the mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement, and to evaluate the early and midlong term effects. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 308 consecutive patients with type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with mitral valve repair (a repair group, n=172) or with mitral valve replacement (a replacement group, n=136) in our hospital between January 2000 and March 2014. Among the 308 patients, 215 were males and 93 were females with mean age of 62.7±11.5 years(ranged 30-78 years). In the repair group, 170 patients underwent restrictive mitral annuloplasty (128 patients with total ring, 42 patients with C ring), and 2 patients underwent commissural constriction. In the replacement group, 11 patients underwent mechanical valve prosthesis and 125 patients underwent biological valve prosthesis. ResultsThe time of total aortic cross-clamp was 81.9±21.5 min. The time of total extracorporeal circulation was 122.0±31.3 min. Six patients died during the perioperative period. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in general information (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in aortic cross-clamp time, total extracorporeal circulation time, numbers of bypass grafts and the usage rate of left internal mammary artery. The early result after the surgery showed that the incidence rates of low cardiac output and ventricular arrhythmia were significantly higher in the replacement group compared with those in the repair group. The patients were followed up for 1-85 months. No significant difference was revealed in the mid-long term survival rate between the two groups. The severity of mitral regurgitation and the rate of redo mitral valve replacement were significantly lower in the replacement group compared with those in the repair group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe early-term curative effect of valve repair is better than valve replacement for the treatment of Carpentier's type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation. In mid-long term, Chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement remains a low incidence of valve-related complications compared with mitral valve repair.
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of partial aortic root remodeling for root reconstruction on Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods From January 2010 to December 2015, 30 patients (25 males, 5 females) underwent partial aortic root remodeling for root reconstruction on Stanford type A aortic dissection with involvement of aortic root. The range of age was from 27 to 72 years, and the mean age was 51.2±8.0 years. The proximal aortic dissection received partial aortic root remodeling, and the operation procedures included partial aortic root remodeling+ascending aortic replacement in 9 patients, partial aortic root remodeling+ascending aortic replacement+hemi-arch replacement in 6 patients, partial aortic root remodeling+ascending aortic replacement+Sun's procedure in 15 patients. The patients were followed up for 10 to 60 months with a mean of 37.9±3.2 months. Preoperative and postoperative degrees of aortic regurgitation were compared. Results All patients survived from the operation, and one patient died from severe pulmonary infection 15 days after operation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% (29/30). One patient died during the follow-up. Two patients underwent aortic valve replacement in the 12th and 15th postoperative month respectively because of severe aortic regurgitation (AI). Up to the last follow-up, trivial or no aortic regurgitation was demonstrated in 24 patients, but mild aortic regurgitation occurred in 2 patients. Conclusion The surgical treatment for aortic root pathology due to Stanford type A aortic dissection is challenging, and partial aortic root remodeling operations could restore valve durability and function, and obtains the early- and mid-term results.
Objective To explore the operability of concomitant ablation for the patients with valvular heart diseases with left atrium bigger than 60 mm. Methods We prospectively included 306 patients with concomitant ablation in our hospital between 2013 and 2015 year. Based on diameter of left atrium measured by intra-operative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), we separated these patients into two groups including a group L (left atrium >60 mm, 93 patients, 55 males and 38 females at age of 57.0±10.1 years) and a group S (left atrium <60 mm, 213 patients, 120 males and 93 females at age of 55.2±9.9 years) and followed them on 4 time points (time on discharge, three months, six months, and one year after surgery). Then, we analyzed the impact of left atrial size on cardioversion outcome of surgical ablation based on the following data. Results The successful rate of the group S and the group L in the 4 time points was 72.8% vs. 75.3%, 74.2% vs. 75.3%, 78.9% vs. 77.4%, and 77.0% vs. 77.4%, respectively . The result of both univariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operation characteristic(ROC) curve analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in cardioversion rates between the group S and the group L. And there was no evident correlation between size of left atrium and ablation failure. Conclusion Patients with left atrium enlarged from 60 mm to 70 mm can achieve the same satisfactory results in cardioversion, and should not be the contraindication of concomitant surgical ablation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the cause of death in low-risk cardiac surgery patients during postoperative period and discuss the prevention and treatment methods to increase the survival rate.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 132 patients dead after cardiac surgery from January 2014 to December 2018, among whom 35 patients had a EuroSCORE Ⅱ score <4% (low-risk cardiac surgery patients), including 20 males and 15 females aged 62.7±13.4 years. The cause of death in these low-risk patients was analyzed.ResultsThe main causes of death were cardiogenic and brain-derived causes (60.0%), and infections and ogran failure (45.7%). Pulmonary infection and low cardiac output after surgery were the main causes of death. Cerebral infarction, malignant arrhythmia and multiple organ failure were the common causes of death. There were 4 deaths (11.4%) caused by accidents, including gastrointestinal bleeding caused by esophageal ultrasound probe, cough and asphyxia caused by drinking water, postoperative paralytic ileus and multiple perioperative allergic reactions caused by allergic constitution.ConclusionPostoperative treatment and prevention for low-risk cardiac surgery patients should be focused on postoperative infection, and cardiac and brain function protection. Changes in various organ functions need to be closely monitored for preventing organ failure, accidents should be strictly controlled, and more details of intraoperative and postoperative treatment still need to be further improved.