【摘要】 探讨日间手术模式的运行流程及效果，并对日间手术的管理及优势予以总结。2009年10月-2011年2月，我中心采用日间手术模式对普外、儿外、泌尿、耳鼻喉、眼、消化、肾脏等疾病患者施行手术治疗。顺利完成日间手术约5 900余例，日间手术成功率100%，未发生1例因为迟发并发症而重新入院治疗事件，患者及家属对各自的治疗方案满意。合理的日间手术模式和流程，可以最大限度地减少医疗费用，缩短患者等待入院和行手术时间，提高床位周转率和利用率，符合医患双方的利益。【Abstract】 This article discusses the operating process and results of ambulatory surgery, and to summarize the management and advantages of ambulatory surgery. From October 2009 to February 2011, the mode of ambulatory surgery was used in our department to treat patients. General, pediatric, urological, otolaryngological, ophthalmological surgeries and surgeries for digestive system and kidney were completed in this mode. About 5 900 surgeries were completed successfully with a mission success rate of 100%. No rehospitalization event occurred because of late onset complications. Both patients and families were satisfied with the treatment. Reasonable mode and process of ambulatory surgery can decrease cost of the patients, shorten waiting time of being admitted and operated, and improve the turnover and using rates of beds. It will bring benefits for both hospitals and patients.
ObjectiveTo understand the application of the Braden pressure ulcer risk-factor assessment scale in the nursing staff, in order to provide reference for clinical nurses to standardize the use of Braden assessment scale and facilitate the hospital to develop training programs on pressure ulcer related knowledge. MethodsStratified cluster sampling method was applied in February 2015. Using the self-designed questionnaire of “Application of Braden pressure ulcer risk-factor assessment scale in the nursing staff ”, we conducted a survey on 198 clinical nurses, and the survey results were scrutinized. The difficulty level of using Braden assessment scale in the nurses was analyzed based on their different demographic characteristics. We also analyzed the items which were most difficult to judge for the nurses and nurses’ learning needs for knowledge on Braden assessment scale. ResultsA total of 168 (84.85%) nurses found it difficult in using Braden scale for the evaluation of pressure ulcer. The most difficult items to judge for the nurses were friction force, shear force and feeling. Nurses in departments with pressure ulcer as a common symptom of the patients could better use the Braden pressure ulcer risk-factor scale, compared with those in departments where pressure ulcer was uncommon (P＜ 0.05) . A total of 189 (95.46%) nurses thought it necessary to carry out a unified quantitative standard analysis of six risk factors in the Braden scale. Conclusions The poor mastery of the assessment standards for Braden scale in the nurses causes various degrees of difficulty in applying the scale, which can influence the accuracy of assessment. It is important to train the nurses on pressure ulcer risk factor assessment in order to raise the clinical assessment accuracy.