ObjectiveTo review the current status and progress of locking plate for the treatment of distal femoral comminuted fractures.MethodsThe related literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the current status and progress in the treatment of distal femoral comminuted fracture with locking plate from four aspects: the current treatment situation, the shortcomings of locking plate and countermeasures, the progress of locking technology, locking plate and digital orthopedic technology.ResultsTreatment of distal femoral comminuted fractures is challenging. Locking plates, the most commonly used fixation for distal femoral comminuted fractures, still face a high rate of treatment failure. Double plates can improve the mechanical stability of comminuted fractures, but specific quantitative criteria are still lacking for when to choose double plates for fixation. The far cortial locking screw has shown good application value in improving the micro-movement and promoting the growth of callus. The biphasic plating is a development of the traditional locking plate, but needs further clinical examination. As an auxiliary means, digital orthopedic technology shows a good application prospect.ConclusionThe inherent defect of locking plate is a factor that affects the prognosis of distal femoral comminuted fracture. The optimization of locking technology combined with digital orthopedic technology is expected to reduce the failure rate of treatment of distal femoral comminuted fracture.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of wrist arthroscopy assisted treatment of distal radius fractures.MethodsTo summarize and describe the anatomical characteristics and fracture classification of the distal radius, indications and contraindications of wrist arthroscopy-assisted treatment, surgical methods, and associated soft tissue injuries, and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the operation through a large number of literature at home and abroad on the treatment of distal radius fractures assisted by wrist arthroscopy.ResultsWrist arthroscopy as a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of distal radius fractures, compared with traditional surgery, can accurately observe intra-articular damage and perform operations under the microscope to avoid secondary damage to blood vessels, nerve, and tendon, etc., and can achieve one-stage repair and reconstruction by repairing the ligament, trigonal fibrocartilage complex, and carpal dislocation. It has the advantages of less trauma, fast postoperative recovery, extensive indications, fewer complications, and satisfactory effectiveness.ConclusionWrist arthroscopy has advantages that traditional X-ray film, CT, MRI, and arthrography examinations do not have. Moreover, wrist arthroscopy has achieved satisfactory effectiveness in the adjuvant treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures.
Objective To investigate the effect of functional exercises at different time and different immobilization positions on the functional recovery of elbow joint with type C distal humeral fractures. Methods A total of 120 patients with type C distal humeral fractures admitted to the hospital between June 2013 and July 2015 were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to 3 groups, 40 patients in each group. Group A: functional exercises began immediately after the operation; Group B: the affected elbow was fixed at 90° flexion for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization; Group C: the affected elbow was fixed at 30° extension for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization. There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture pattern, fracture side, injury time, and surgical approach between groups (P>0.05). Results In groups A and B, 1 case had incision redness and swelling respectively, and the other incisions healed by first intention. Five patients occurred myositis ossificans in group A, 4 cases in group B, and 5 cases in group C. The incidence of complications in groups A, B, and C was 15.0% (6/40), 12.5% (5/40), and 12.5% (5/40), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups (χ2=0.144, P=0.930). All patients were followed up 6-25 months, with an average of 9.8 months. At 2 weeks after operation, the Mayo elbow joint function score of group A was significantly higher than those of groups B and C (P<0.05), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of group A was significantly lower than those of groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in Mayo elbow joint function score and VAS score between groups (P>0.05). At 2 weeks and 6 months after operation, the flexion and extension activities of elbow joint in groups A and C were better than that in group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between groups A and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in forearm rotation between groups (P>0.05). All fractures of 3 groups achieved clinical healing, and there was no significant difference in healing time between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Early functional exercises can relieve pain and obtain better elbow flexion and extesion activities after operation. The elbow joint fixed at 30° extension is better than at 90° flexion in elbow flexion and extension activitis.
Objective To determine the cl inical results of locking plate system in the treatment of distal radial fractures. Methods From May 2004 to November 2006, 75 patients were treated with 2.4 mm locking plate system. There were 41 males and 34 females, with a mean age of 51 years old (range, 13-82 years old). The locations were left side in 34 casesand right side in 41 cases. The cause of injury was a low energy fall in 49 cases, fall ing from height in 14 cases, traffic accident in 6 cases and sports injuries in 6 cases. All patients were diagnosed as having closed fracture. According to Müller-AO classification, there were 14 cases(18.7%) of type A, 5 cases(6.7%) of type B, and 56 cases(74.6%) of type C. The time from injury to operation was 5 hours to 27 days (mean 6 days). Results A total of 75 patients were followed up at 3 months, 71 patients at 6 months, 68 patients at 1 year and 51 patients at 2 years. Heal ing by first intention of incision was achieved in 73 cases, and infection occurred in 2 cases. Fracture reduction failed at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months in 1 case, respectively; 1 case received plaster fixation and 2 cases received re-fixation and autograft of il ium; and fracture healed in 3 cases at last follow-up. Two patients complained of skin numbness at site of superficial branch of radial nerve after 1 day, 1 patient had wound pain after operation, and 1 patient had infection of tendon at 3 days and 5 days in 1 case respectively. At last follow-up, the ranges of motion of wrist joint were (80 ± 9)° for pronation, (86 ± 7)° for supination, (57 ± 10)° for dorsal flexion, (51 ± 13)° for palmar flexion, (18 ± 7)° for radial incl ination, and (28 ± 7)° for ulnar deviation. According to modified Green scoring, the results were excellent in 66 cases, good in 6 cases and poor in 3 cases. At last follow-up, according to Knirk criterion for osteoarthritis, there were 22 cases of grade I and 5 cases of grade II, and all were classified as type C. Conclusion Internal fixation of distal radial fractures with 2.4 mm locking plate system provided a stable fixation with good cl inical outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of external fixation (EF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for unstable distal radius fractures in adults. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), Cochrane Central register of controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008), EMbase (1974 to September 2008), CBM, CNKI, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EF and ORIF for unstable distal radius fractures in adults. The quality of the included studies was critically assessed and data analyses were performed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Seven RCTs involving 634 patients were included, of which 269 were in EF group, and 293 were in ORIF group. Only 1 study had relative high quality, all the others had some limitation in randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment. The results of meta-analyses showed that, 1) about the effectiveness: according to the Gartland and Werley grade standard, the ORIF group was better than the EF group with statistic difference (RR=1.50, 95%CI 1.11 to 2.03, P=0.008); because of the original studies did not offer the detailed data including pad strength, grip strength, flexion-extension, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation, we only processed a descriptive analysis; and 2) about complications: the infection rate of the pin track was higher in the EF group than that in the ORIF group with statistic difference (RR=0.24, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.76, P=0.02); but there were no differences between the two groups in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.30 to 2.56, P=0.82), extensor tendon rupture (RR=3.93, 95%CI 0.45 to 34.62, P=0.22), and compartment syndrome (RR=3.13, 95%CI 0.51 to 19.09, P=0.22). Conclusions Compared with EF, ORIF is much better based on Gartland and Werley grade standard, and causes much less infection. Because of the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more proofs are required from more RCTs with large sample.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision in the treatment of type C3.3 distal femoral fractures. Methods From July 2006 to February 2009, 11 cases of type C3.3 distal femoral fractures were treated, including 5 open fractures and 6 closed fractures. Among them, there were 7 males and 4 females with an averageage of 43 years (range, 27-55 years). The locations were left side in 6 cases and right side in 5 cases. Fracture was caused by traffic accident in 8 cases and fall ing from height in 3 cases. The time from injury to hospital ization was 30 minutes to 7 days. After bone traction for 3 to 8 days, the operations were performed by double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision, and autograft of il iac bone or allogeneic bone grafting. Results The average time of operation was 128 minutes (range, 105-150 minutes). The average blood loss during operation was 344 mL (range, 290-380 mL). Shallow local skin flap necrosis occurred in 2 cases, and incision healed by first intention in others patients. All patients were followed up 22 months on average (range, 12-36 months). The bone union was achieved within 3-6 months (4.4 months on average). No implant loosening or refracture was found. According to Merchan et al criteria for knee joint function evaluation, the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case at last follow-up; the excellent and good rate was 81.8%. Conclusion The double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision has the advantages of better exposure, great convenience to manipulation, anatomical reduction, and rigid fixation. It provides an effective treatment for type C3.3 distal femoral fracture. However, its operation indications and operating instructions should be strictly followed.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of external fixation and volar locking compression plate in the treatment of distal radius fractures of type C. MethodsBetween March 2012 and March 2013, 122 patients with distal radius fractures of type C were enrolled in the prospective randomized study. Fractures were treated by external fixation in 61 patients (external fixation group) and by open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking compression plate in 61 patients (plate group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture side, weight, height, body mass index, fracture type, and interval of injury and operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The blood loss, operation time, hospitalization days, fracture union time, wrist function, and complications were compared between 2 groups. And the quality of reduction was observed, including volar tilting angle, ulnar deviation, radial height, and articular reduction. ResultsThe blood loss, operation time, and hospitalization days in plate group were significantly higher than those in external fixation group (P<0.05). All of the patients in both groups were followed up 12-28 months. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (6.6%) of external fixation group (pin tract infection in 2 cases and radial nerve neuritis in 2 cases) and in 5 patients (8.2%) of plate group (wound infection in 1 case, carpal tunnel syndrome in 2 cases, and tendon rupture in 2 cases), showing no significant difference between 2 groups (P=0.500). The X-ray films showed fracture healing in all patients of 2 groups; the union time of plate group was significantly longer than that of external fixation group (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in ulnar deviation and radial height between 2 groups (P>0.05), but the volar tilting angle of plate group was significantly larger than that of external fixation group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in wrist function and articular reduction between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor distal radius fractures of type C, the use of external fixation or volar locking compression plate can obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes, but the external fixation has the advantages of less invasion, shorter hospitalization days, minor complications, and faster fracture union.