Objective To evaluate the therapeutic outcome of artificial total hip arthroplasty (THA) with collum femoris preserving for hip joint desease in young and middle-aged patients. Methods From March 2002 to March 2005, 26 cases (31 hips) of hip joint disease were treated with artificial THA with collum femoris preserving, including 19 males (23 hips)and 7 females (8 hips) and aged 32-48 years with an average of 37 years. In 31 hips, 17 left hips and 14 right hips were involved. There were 9 cases of osteoarthritis of the hip joint caused by avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH), 7 cases of ANFH, 3 cases of femoral head necrosis caused by dysplasia of acetabular, 1 case of osteoarthritis of the hip joint caused by ankylosing spondyl itis, and 2 cases of rheumatoid arthritis; the course of disease was 2-11 years (5.6 years on average). Two cases of femoral neck fracture (Garden IV), and 2 cases of non-union femoral neck fractures (1 for Garden III and 1 for Garden IV), the course of disease was 5 days, 24 months, and 26 months. The prime symptoms were pain, difficult walk and l imp. All patients were taken X-ray to exclude osteoporosis. Results The right distal femur prosthesis of a bilateral patient cracked owing to excessive amputation of collum femoris, and fracture healed after symptomatic treatment. All the incisions healed by first intention and no compl ications occurred. All patients were followed up for 4-7 years, with an average of 5.6 years. One case had poor hip function because he did not follow rehabil itation procedure, and the others achieved good outcome with normal gait. One case complained of persistent pain 6 months after operation, and was rel ieved by administration of some non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and anti-osteoporosis drugs 6 months later. The X-ray films after operation and at last follow up showed good location of prosthesis and no bone resorption. Harris score at last follow-up was 91.31 ± 0.77, and it was significantly higher than that before operation (50.88 ± 0.90), (P lt; 0.05). The excellent and good rate was 93.5% (excellent in 11 hips, good in 18 hips, and fair in 2 hips). Conclusion Artificial THA with collum femoris preserving can retain more bone, be easier for revision, and has an excellent outcome.
Objective To compare the short-term result between the high-flex (HF) and conventional posteriorstabil ized (PS) prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods From April 2005 to October 2007, 23 cases (27 knees) underwent TKA by HF prosthesis (HF group), and 35 cases (41 knees) underwent TKA by PS prosthesis (PS group).In HF group, there were 2 males (3 knees) and 21 females (24 knees) aged (64.3 ± 5.6) years, including 20 cases (23 knees) of osteoarthritis and 3 cases (4 knees) of rheumatoid arthritis; body mass index (BMI) was 27.3 ± 3.9; the course of disease was (5.3 ± 5.6) years; the Hospital for Special Surgery Scoring System (HSS) score was 58.4 ± 7.9; the Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score was 49.4 ± 6.9; the maximum knee flex degree was (107.6 ± 8.3)°; and the range of knee motion was (103.5 ± 7.7)°. In PS group, there were 3 males (3 knees) and 32 females (38 knees) aged (65.1 ± 5.9) years, including 33 cases (39 knees) of osteoarthritis and 2 cases (2 knees) of rheumatoid arthritis; BMI was 27.1 ± 4.1; the course of disease was (5.1 ± 4.9) years; HSS score was 60.1 ± 10.4; WOMAC score was 47.9 ± 7.2; the maximum knee flex degree was (108.4 ± 9.7)°; and the range of knee motion was (105.9 ± 11.4)°. There were no significant differences in general data between two groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions achieved heal ing by first intention. No compl ication of ankylosis, blood vessel and nerve injuries, and prosthesis loosening occurred. All patients were followed up for 24-54 months (average 32.8 months). There were no significant differences in the HSS score, WOMAC score, the maximum knee flex degrees, and the range of knee motion at 3, 12, and 24 months after operation between two groups (P gt; 0.05), but there were significant differencesbetween pre- and post-operation (P lt; 0.05). Anterior knee pain occurred in 1 case of HF group and 4 cases of PS group after 24 months, the incidence rates were 3.70% in HF group and 9.76% in PS group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The X-ray films showed that no lucent zone around prosthesis and no patella baja were observed, and the force l ine was excellent. Conclusion There is no significant difference in the range of knee motion and cl inical scores between the HF prosthesis and the PS prosthesis, but the former’s incidence rate of anterior knee pain is lower.