ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) for acute closed Achilles tendon ruptures. MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2012, 30 patients (30 sides)with acute closed Achilles tendon ruptures were treated with CAMIR technique. Among 30 patients, 18 were male and 12 were female with an average age of 30.4 years (range, 22-50 years); the locations were left side in 10 cases and right side in 20 cases. All the causes were sports injury. B-ultrasound was used to confirm the diagnosis, with the average distance from the rupture site to the Achilles tendon insertion of 4.4 cm (range, 2-8 cm). The time from injury to operation was 3 hours to 9 days (median, 4 days). All injuries were repaired by CAMIR technique. ResultsThe average operation time was 17.0 minutes (range, 10-25 minutes), and the mean incision length was 2.0 cm (range, 1.5-2.5 cm). All the incisions healed by first intention. There was no complication of wound problem, deep vein thrombosis, re-rupture, or sural nerve injury. All cases were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 16 months. At last follow-up, the patients could walk normally with powerful raising heels and restored to normal activity level. MRI imaging suggested the continuity and healing of ruptured tendon. The circumference difference between affected leg and normal leg was less than 1 cm, and the ankle dorsi-extension was 20-30°, plantar flexion was 20-30°. Arner Lindholm score showed that the surgical results were excellent in 28 cases and good in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. ConclusionCAMIR is a safe and reliable method to repair acute closed Achilles tendon rupture, with many advantages of minimal injury, low re-rupture and infection. Sural nerve injury can be minimized using CAMIR by carefully placing the suture channel with a stab incision and special trocar based on a modified Bunnel suture technique.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation system based on error correction method for femoral neck fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 20 femoral neck fracture patients treated by computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation system based on error correction method between January 2014 and October 2015 (trial group), and 36 femoral neck fracture patients undergoing traditional manual surgery with closed reduction by cannulated screw fixation in the same period (the control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side of fracture, types of fracture, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative frequency of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion, fracture healing time, fracture healing rate, and Harris hip score were compared between 2 groups. Results All incisions healed by first intention after operation, and no complication of blood vessel and nerve injury occurred. The operation time of trial group was significantly longer than that of control group (t=2.290,P=0.026), however, the intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative frequency of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion of trial group were significantly less than those of control group (t=–10.650,P=0.000;t=18.320,P=0.000;t=–16.625,P=0.000). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.7 months). X-ray films showed that fracture healing was obtained in 2 groups, showing no significant difference in fracture healing time between 2 groups (t=0.208,P=0.836). No complication of ischemic necrosis of femoral head occurred during follow-up period. At last follow-up, the Harris hip score was 87.05±3.12 in trial group and was 86.78±2.83 in control group, showing no significant difference (t=0.333,P=0.741). Conclusion Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation surgery based on error correction method for femoral neck fractures is better than traditional manual surgery in decreasing intraoperative radiation and surgical trauma during operation.
Objective To explore the application value and effectiveness of pelvic unlocking closed reduction device for the treatment of unstable pelvic posterior ring disruption. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 243 cases of unstable pelvic posterior ring disruption treated with pelvic unlocking closed reduction device in 13 orthopaedic trauma centers across the country between December 2018 and June 2020 was performed. There were 139 males and 104 females; the age ranged from 18 to 92 years, with an average age of 48.5 years. The cause of injury included 132 cases of traffic accident injuries, 102 cases of falling from height, and 9 cases of crushing injuries. According to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 5 cases of type 61-B1, 13 cases of type 61-B2, 32 cases of type 61-C1.1, 47 cases of type 61-C1.2, 89 cases of type 61-C1.3, 35 cases of type 61-C2, and 22 cases of type 61-C3. The time from injury to operation was 2-121 days, with a median of 10 days. Preoperative preparation time, installation time of unlocking closed reduction device, fracture reduction time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical complications were recorded, and Matta scoring standard was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction. According to Matta evaluation results, the patients were divided into two subgroups: excellent-good group and fair-poor group. The differences in gender, age, time from injury to operation, AO/OTA classification, and perioperative clinical indicators were compared between the two groups, and the effects of baseline data and perioperative indicators on the quality of fracture reduction were studied. Results Pelvic unlocking closed reduction device did not interfere with the display of the pelvic structure and fracture displacement direction during the intraoperative fluoroscopy, effectively correcting the displacement of the pelvic ring. The preoperative preparation time was 17-60 minutes, with an average of 30 minutes; installation time of unlocking closed reduction device was 10-32 minutes, with an average of 21 minutes; intraoperative fracture reduction time was 15-205 minutes, with an average of 49.2 minutes; intraoperative fluoroscopy times were 41-420 times, with an average of 132 times; intraoperative blood loss was 40-1 500 mL, with an average of 71.5 mL. The reduction quality of pelvic fracture was evaluated according to Matta score immediately after operation. The results were excellent in 153 cases, good in 61 cases, fair in 24 cases, and poor in 5 cases. The excellent and good rate was 88.1%. Further subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in other indexes (P>0.05) between the excellent-good group and the fair-poor group except for the time from injury to operation and AO/OTA classification (P<0.05). Among them, the excellent-good reduction rate was 92.2% (119/129) in patients with injury-to-operation time less than 10 days, and the fair-poor reduction rate was 25.7% (9/35) and 40.9% (9/22) in patients with AO/OTA 61-C2 and 61-C3 types, respectively. There was no surgery-related complication due to the application of the pelvic unlocked reduction device, no secondary iliac fractures, vascular, or nerve injuries, and postoperative CT showed that all channel screws were located in the osseous channel. ConclusionThe pelvic unlocking reduction device can effectively help to reduce the unstable pelvic posterior ring and maintain reduction, meet the needs of different projection angles of pelvic fracture with intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy. The system facilitate the operation of pelvic reduction and precise fixation.