This article described the clinical diagnosis and treatment of a patient with bicuspid aortic stenosis occurring severe mitral regurgitation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Before transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the patient’s information about medical history, signs, evaluation of CT and echocardiography were collected. After discussion by the heart team, the trans-femoral aortic valve replacement was performed. After the valve was placed during the procedure, a severe mitral regurgitation occurred. No clear causes were found, and the patient’s hemodynamics was stable. The patient recovered well during follow-up, so surgery and other treatments were not considered. This article discussed the possible mechanism and solutions of mitral regurgitation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and owned certain value for similar cases to refer to.
Objective To search and review the best clinical evidence to compare the clinical therapeutic effects and safety between TAVR and SAVR, thereby guiding its clinical use and providing references of treatments for such patients. Methods EMbase (1974～2016), MEDLINE (1996～2016) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016) were systematically retrieved to collect randomized control trials, case-control studies and meta-analyses. Then, we assessed the quality of all the evidences to develop treatments based on those evidences and the situations of such patients. Results We identified 21 articles, including 2 articles of meta-analysis. With regard to the mortality and incidence of cardiovascular events, TAVR was not worse than SAVR. In addition, TAVR was more dominant than SAVR for patients who combined more basic diseases. Conclusion TAVR is one of the effective treatments for most patients with severe AS after sufficient assessment.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of Venus A-Valve and other overseas devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the baseline characteristics, procedural details, and postprocedural outcomes of severe AS patients who underwent TAVR with Venus A-Valve or overseas devices between April 2012 and January 2019 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University.ResultsA total of 342 AS patients undergoing TAVR were finally included, 238 with Venus A-Valve and the other 104 with overseas devices (43 with CoreValve, 33 with Lotus, 21 with SAPIEN XT, and 7 with SAPIEN 3). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and the proportion of patients with bicuspid aortic valve was around 50% in both groups. After successful valve implantation, all patients’ hemodynamics were significantly improved, with the median of maximum velocity decreased to 2.30 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.60 m/s) and 2.50 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.62 m/s), respectively (P=0.003). Postprocedural 30-day and 1-year all cause mortalities were similar (30-day: 5.9% vs. 1.9%, P=0.086; 1-year: 8.4% vs. 5.8%, P=0.307), while low incidence of procedure-related complications and improved life quality were achieved in both groups.ConclusionTAVR with the domestic Venus A-Valve is feasible, safe, and can produce favorable outcomes for AS patients, and especially for Chinese TAVR population with a high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an important treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The 2020 updated version of Chinese Expert Consensus on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement was born in the process of Chinese exploration for TAVR. It is of epochal guiding significance for TAVR in China, which has entered a stage of rapid development from the initial stage. Moreover, it further promotes the standardized and healthy development of TAVR in China. The 2020 updated version of Chinese Expert Consensus on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, based on its 2015 version, has included aortic valve stenosis with a low risk of surgical operation as an indication, made more detailed recommendations on the operating specifications of balloon dilation and valve placement during TAVR, added the antithrombotic program after TAVR, and important opinions on the treatment of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, renal insufficiency, and emergency TAVR. In this article, we will focus on all these updates to interpret the updated consensus in detail.
An 82-year-old male was hospitalized complaining of dyspnea for 1 year and aggravating for 2 weeks. He had been treated in other hospitals for several times due to such situation and his symptom could be relieved by diuretics. After admission, he was diagnosed as severe aortic stenosis with extremely low left ventricular contractile function; transthoracic echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of only 16.1%. He was classified as a typical case of severe aortic stenosis with “low transaortic velocity and low transaortic gradient” since the transaortic velocity being 2.36 m/s and transaortic gradient being 22/14 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa). Dobutamine-stress echocardiography suggested that the patient’s left ventricular reserve function was extremely poor and the potential benefits of valvular surgery were finite as the former data being 2.59 m/s and 27/16 mm Hg respectively. In consideration of progressive exacerbation of the patient’s symptoms, we eventually conducted transcatheter aortic valve replacement surgery with the support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. His symptoms such as dyspnea disappeared after the surgery and clinical parameters had also got a significant improvement.
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using Venus A-Plus valve delivery system in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing TAVR in our hospital from August 2018 to March 2022 were collected and divided into a Venus A-PLUS and a Venus A group according to the type of valve delivery system used. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 121 patients were included, including 70 patients in the Venus A-Plus group (45 males and 25 females with a mean age of 67.81±6.62 years), and 51 patients in the Venus A group (33 males and 18 females with a mean age of 68.25±7.01 years). All patients underwent TAVR, and the postoperative hemodynamic features (left ventricular ejection fraction, mean cross-valve pressure difference, peak flow rate) were significantly improved (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in surgical success rate, all-cause mortality, conversion to thorax opening, midvalve placement, moderate or above perivalvular regurgitation, new left bundle branch block or new right bundle branch block between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion TAVR with Venus A-Plus valve delivery system in patients with severe aortic stenosis is satisfactory, safe and reliable.
This case was an elderly male patient with symptomatic aortic valve calcification and severe aortic valve stenosis. Before the operation, the heart valve team had fully evaluated the patient’s suitability for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and approach. This patient had severe stenosis and plaques in the iliac artery, femoral artery, descending aorta, so the carotid artery approach transcatheter aortic valve replacement was chosen. After the operation, the patient’s symptoms improved significantly. So far, the patient was generally in good condition, without chest tightness, shortness of breath and other symptoms in daily activities. The current clinical application of the transcarotid approach is relatively small, but it is believed that with the publication of more clinical research results, the application of the transcarotid approach in transcatheter aortic valve replacement will become more and more common.
ObjectiveTo compare the early clinical efficacy and safety of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with severe AS admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from January 2020 to March 2024. According to the surgical method, patients were divided into a SAVR group and a TA-TAVI group, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 71 patients were included, with 45 in the SAVR group, including 33 males and 12 females, aged 16-75 (60.89±10.88) years; 26 in the TA-TAVI group, including 15 males and 11 females, aged 61-83 (72.85±5.53) years. The results showed that postoperative aortic valve transvalvular flow velocity (2.31±0.38 m/s vs. 2.60±0.50 m/s, P=0.019) and transvalvular pressure gradient (21.09±6.03 mm Hg vs. 28.20±10.79 mm Hg, P=0.001) in the TA-TAVI group were lower than those in the SAVR group. In terms of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, both preoperative (56.73±7.74 mm vs. 52.36±7.00 mm, P=0.017) and postoperative (52.61±7.18 mm vs. 48.04±4.78 mm, P=0.010) values in the TA-TAVI group were larger than those in the SAVR group. In terms of left ventricular ejection fraction, the preoperative value in the TA-TAVI group was lower than that in the SAVR group (58.00%±13.84% vs. 64.87%±7.63%, P=0.026), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups after surgery (P=0.670). The operation time and drainage volume on the first day after surgery in the TA-TAVI group were shorter or lower than those in the SAVR group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the postoperative hospital stay, ICU stay, or postoperative mechanical ventilation time (P>0.05). In addition, no serious complications occurred in patients after SAVR, while perivalvular leakage (2 patients), third-degree atrioventricular block (1 patient), and death (3 patients) occurred in the TA-TAVI group. ConclusionFor elderly patients with severe AS and poor cardiac function, TA-TAVI technology has minimal surgical trauma, high safety and effectiveness, and is a safe and effective treatment option besides traditional surgical operations.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors and potential mechanisms of hypertension events on the same day after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. MethodsClinical data of patients who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at Department of Structural Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital from December 2023 to February 2024 were retrospectively collected. According to the peak systolic blood pressure on the same day after surgery, patients were divided into a hypertension group (≥140 mm Hg) and a normal blood pressure group (<140 mm Hg). Logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for hypertension on the same day after TAVI. ResultsA total of 54 patients after TAVI were included, with 41 patients in the hypertension group, including 18 males and 23 females, with an average age of (72.83±6.78) years; 13 patients in the normal blood pressure group, including 9 males and 4 females, with an average age of (70.00±7.57) years. Univariate analysis found that there were statistical differences in interventricular septal thickness [(13.71±1.98) mm vs. (12.23±1.59) mm, P=0.018], preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)>55% [33 (80.5%) vs. 6 (46.2%), P=0.040], and postoperative same-day LVEF>55% [33 (80.5%) vs. 4 (30.8%), P=0.003]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that postoperative same-day LVEF>55% [OR=10.173, 95%CI (1.044, 99.115), P=0.046] was an independent risk factor for hypertension on the same day after TAVI. ConclusionMyocardial contractility mainly participates in the occurrence of hypertension on the same day after TAVI. This study can not only improve our understanding of early hemodynamic changes after TAVI, but also provide a basis for the formulation of early hypertension treatment plans after TAVI to improve the short- and long-term prognosis of patients.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become one of the main treatments for severe aortic stenosis. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often required in elderly patients who combine with coronary artery disease. This paper reports a case of one-stop TAVR+PCI operation for a 71-year-old male patient with left main bifurcation lesions and severe aortic stenosis. During the procedure, first of all, the coronary arteries were assessed by angiography, and the pigtail catheter was implanted in the left ventricle after the straight guidewire transvalved successfully; then PCI was performed on the diseased coronary arteries; finally, the stenosis of aortic valve was treated with TAVR. After operation, the hemodynamics of the patient was stable and symptoms were significantly improved, showing a good clinical effect of one-stop operation of TAVR+PCI.