Objective To review the efficacy of reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring for treating proximal ulna and olecranon fractures. Methods Between November 2004 and September 2009, 10 patients with proximal ulna and olecranon fractures were treated by reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring. There were 6 males and4 females with an average age of 45.3 years (range, 21-75 years). Five fractures were caused by traffic accident, 2 by fall ing from height, 2 by tumbl ing, and 1 by a machine strangulation. The locations were the left side and the right side in 5 cases respectively. One case was open fracture (Gustilo II) and the other 9 were closed fractures. Olecranon fractures included 4 cases of traverse fractures and 6 cases of comminuted fractures, and proximal ulna fractures included 6 cases of comminuted fractures and 4 cases of obl ique fractures. The combined fractures included 6 radial head fractures, 4 coronoid process fractures, 2 proximal humerus fractures, and 3 scapula fractures; other injury included 1 elbow dislocation and 1 shoulder dislocation. Two patients had secondary operation; the other 8 patients received the primary operations and the time from injury to operation varied from 7 days to 20 days, with an average of 11 days. Results One case had infection at the incision 1 week after operation, and recovered after 2 months of antibiotics and debridement; incisions healed by first intention in other 9 patients. All patients were followed up 12-64 months (mean, 40.5 months). The X-ray films showed that fracture heal ing was achieved at 10-24 weeks (mean, 12 weeks). There was no ulnar nerve symptom in all cases. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 1 case at 2 months and stiffness of the elbow in 1 case at 3 months after operation; they were both cured after symptomatic treatment. Proximal migration of Kirschner wires was found in 1 case at 6 months after operation, whose implants were taken out at 9 months after the first operation because fracture had healed. At last follow-up, the flexion and extension arc of the elbow averaged 92.8°(range, 23-130°), and the arc of forearm rotation averaged 124.4° (range, 42-175°). According to the American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) evaluation method, the results were classified as excellent in 6 cases, good in 2, fair in 1, and poor in 1. Conclusion Treating proximal ulna and olecranon fractures by reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring allows patients to do postoperative exercise early and could effectively avoid compl ications.
Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of reconstruction plate internal fixation via improved Stoppa approach combined with iliac fossa approach and Kocher-Langenbeck approach for complex acetabular fractures. Methods Between January 2015 and January 2020, 30 patients with complex acetabular fractures were treated with reconstruction plate internal fixation via improved Stoppa approach combined with iliac fossa approach and Kocher-Langenbeck approach. There were 20 males and 10 females with an average age of 52.1 years (range, 25-71 years). The cause of injury included traffic accident in 17 cases and falling from height in 13 cases. Among them, 14 cases were left acetabular fractures and 16 cases were right acetabular fractures. According to Letournel classification, there were 16 cases of double column fractures, 2 cases of transverse fracture with posterior wall fracture, 4 cases of anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse fractures, 8 cases of T-shaped fracture. The displacement distance of fracture ranged from 6 to 30 mm (mean, 11.6 mm). The time from injury to operation was 6-14 days (mean, 8.7 days). Results The operation time was 2.0-4.5 hours (mean, 3.0 hours). The intraoperative blood loss was 200-800 mL (mean, 450.0 mL). All patients were treated with autologous blood transfusion during operation. All incisions healed by first intention after operation, and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 12-15 months (mean, 13.4 months). The drainage tube was removed at 2-3 days after operation. After extubation, X-ray film and three-dimensional CT were performed to recheck the fracture reduction. According to Matta score system, 20 cases were excellent, 5 were good, and 5 were poor, the excellent and good rate was 83.3%. All fractures healed with the healing time of 16-25 weeks (mean, 17.7 weeks). According to Merle d’Aubigne-Postel score system, the hip function at 1 year after operation was rated as excellent in 18 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 6 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 80.0%. Two cases suffered from sciatic nerve injury due to traction during operation, 7 cases had heterotopic ossification, 2 cases had traumatic hip arthritis, and no other complications occurred. Conclusion For complex acetabular fractures, the reconstruction plate internal fixation via improved Stoppa approach combined with iliac fossa approach and Kocher-Langenbeck approach can obtain good short-term effectiveness with good reduction and hip joint function, and less complications.
Objective To compare the results of plate and Kirschner wire fixation in treatment of nonunion of clavicular fracture. Methods From September 1991 to January 2002, 19 patients (9 with plate and 10 with Kirschner wire) were treated. The results were evaluated by reduction, bone union time, recovery of joint function, pain, and correction of deformation. Results The follow-up time was 6-23 months with an average of 11 months. Bone union -occurred after a mean time of 11 weeks. In plate group, 7 patients gained excellent results, 1 good and1 fair. In Kirschner wire group, 3 patients gained excellent results, 3 good, 3 fair and 1 poor. The result of plate is significantly better than that of Kirschner wire fixation(Plt;0.05). Conclusion Plate fixation is a good simple method for treatment of nonunion of clavicular fracture.
ObjectiveTo discuss the biomechanical stability of locked reconstruction plate for internal fixation of transverse and posterior wall acetabular fracture so as to provide a reliable basis for clinical application. MethodsThe models of transverse and posterior wall acetabular fracture were established in 16 anti-corrosion acetabular specimens from 8 adult cadavers, which were randomly divided into experimental group and control group (n=8). Fracture was fixed with 10-hole posterior column locked reconstruction plate in the experimental group, and with 10-hole posterior column reconstruction plate combined with anterior column lag screw and posterior wall screws in the control group. Biomechanical testing machine was used for loading of 5/6 donor body mass the specimen in a speed of 15 N/s; the loading time was calculated and vertical loading.The longitudinal and quadrilateral body displacements of fracture were recorded to compare the biomechanical stability was performed. ResultsThe quadrilateral body displacement of the experimental group[(1.99±0.32) mm] was greater than that of the control group[(1.75±0.22) mm], but there was no significant difference (t=-1.735, P=0.105). The longitudinal displacement[(1.56±049) mm] and the displacement of the posterior wall fracture block[(0.86±0.33) mm] in the experimental group were lower than those of the control group[(1.64±0.51) and (1.01±0.35) mm], showing no significant difference between 2 groups (t=0.293, P=0.772; t=1.516, P=0.154). ConclusionFor transverse and posterior wall acetabular fracture, application of locked reconstruction plate can provide sufficient biomechanical stability, reduce the risk of screw placement to acetabular joints.
【Abstract】 Objective To summary the effects of staged pelvic closure using external fixator combined withreconstruction plate for old Tile B1 pelvic fracture. Methods From August 2000 to August 2006, 14 patients (9 males and 5 females, age ranging from 21 to 65 years with old Tile B1 pelvic fracture with pubic symphysis separation were treated. The injuries were caused by the traffic accident in 10 patients, high crash in 3, and crush in 1. The duration ranged from 4 weeks to 3 months. The 14 patients were compl icated with other injuries in some degrees. The X-ray and CT showed pubic symphysis separation. In 13 patients, pubic symphysis separation distance was more than 2.5 cm, who also had fracture or dislocation in the posterior structure of pelvis. The X-ray films showed the mean pubic symphysis separation distance was (6.67 ± 2.11) cm preoperatively. The 14 patients underwent pelvic external fixation at first and staged pelvic closure gradually for the pubic symphysis separation. After 2 to 3 weeks, when the pubic symphysis separation distance was less than 1 cm, the patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with reconstruction plate. Pubic symphysis separation distance was measuredin the preoperative and postoperative pelvic anterioposterior X-ray films. The condition of the posterior structure of pelvis was observed in CT films. The functions of patients were assessed according to Majeed grading system. Results All incisions healed by first intention. The 14 patients were followed up for 6 months to 2 years (15 months on average). The X-ray films showed the mean pubic symphysis separation distance of post-operation was (0.85 ± 0.23) cm, showing statistically significant difference when compared with that of pre-operation (P lt; 0.05). The CT films showed fracture and dislocation of the posterior structure of pelvis had bony heal ing after 6 to 12 months. According to the Majeed grading system, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 4 cases and poor in 1 case; the excellent and good rate was 64.29%. Conclusion Staged pelvic closure using external fixation combined with reconstruction plate for old pelvic fracture with pubic symphysis separation can reduce the pubic symphysis separation distance significantly. Satisfactory effects can be expected in treating the patients with TileB1 fracture.
Objective To explore the advantage of reconstruction belt for treating complicated acetabular fracture by combined anterior and posterior approaches through the comparison with reconstruction plate. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 39 patients with acetabular fractures who met the selection criteria. After open reduction by combined anterior and posterior approaches was performed, fracture was fixed by reconstruction belt in 20 cases (trial group), and by reconstruction plate in 19 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to hospital, type of fracture, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The number of plate shaping, plate shaping time, operation time, bleeding amount, perspective times, VAS score, modified Merled’Aubigne-Postel hip score, and related complications were recorded and compared. According to Matta standard, the fracture displacement was measured to evaluate the fracture reduction and fracture healing. Results The number of plate shaping, plate shaping time, operation time, bleeding amount, and perspective times in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The patients were followed up 12-29 months (mean, 21.1 months) in the trial group, and 12-27 months (mean, 20.5 months) in the control group. The VAS score was significantly lower at 7 days and 6 months after operation than at pre-operation, and at 6 months than at 7 days in 2 groups (P < 0.05), but difference was not significant between 2 groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months after operation, the Merled’Aubigne-Postel score of hip function in the trial group was 15.950±1.504, showing no significant difference when compared with the control group (15.895±1.629) (t= -0.110, P=0.913). The fracture displacement was (0.750±1.070) mm in the trial group and was (0.842±1.068) mm in the control group, showing no significant difference (t= -0.269, P=0.789). The X-ray films showed that all fractures healed in 2 groups. The healing time was (16.10±2.07) weeks in the trial group and was (15.84±2.14) weeks in the control group, showing no significant difference (t =0.382, P=0.075). Conclusion Reconstruction belt for complicated acetabular fracture by combined anterior and posterior approaches has similar effectiveness to reconstruction plate, but the number of plate shaping, plate shaping time, and perspective times are fewer.
Objective To compare the biomechanical stability of Kirschner wire and tension band wiring, reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring, and olecranon anatomical plate in fixing proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture, so as to provide the theoretical evidence for clinical selection of internal fixation. Methods Eight specimens of elbow joints and ligaments were taken from eight fresh male adult cadaveric elbows (aged 26-43 years, mean 34.8 years) donated voluntarily. The model of proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture was made by an osteotomy in each specimen. Fracture end was fixed successively by Kirschner wire and tension band wiring (group A), reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring (group B), and olecranon anatomical plate (group C), respectively. The biomechanical test was performed for monopodium compression experiments, and load-displacement curves were obtained. The stability of the fixation was evaluated according to the load value when the compression displacement of fracture segment was 2 mm. Results No Kirschner wire withdrawal, broken plate and screw, loosening and specimens destruction were observed. The load-displacement curves of 3 groups showed that the displacement increased gradually with increasing load, while the curve slope of groups B and C was significantly higher than that of group A. When the compression displacement was 2 mm, the load values of groups A, B, and C were (218.6 ± 66.9), (560.3 ± 116.1), and (577.2 ± 137.6) N, respectively; the load values of groups B and C were significantly higher than that of group A (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between groups B and C (t=0.305, P=0.763). Conclusion The proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture is unstable. Reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring and olecranon anatomical plate can meet the requirement of fracture fixation, so they are favorable options for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture. Kirschner wire and tension band wiring is not a stable fixation, therefore, it should not be only used for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture.