Objective To study the effect of anterior plate fixation on the treatment of middle and lower thirds fractures of humerus and the possibility of operating without injuring the radial nerve. Methods Forty-nine patients with the middle and lower thirds fractures of the humerus were treated with anterior plate fixation from March 1998 to December 2002. Of the 49 patients, 27 were with new fractures, 12 with old fractures, and 10 with nonunion fractures. According to AO classification, of the 49 patients, there were 19 type A, 14 type B1, 9 type B2, 5 type B3, 2 type C1. Thirty-seven patients had closed fractures and 12 had open fractures. Of the 12 patients, 8 were type Gustilo Ⅰ, 4 were type Gustilo Ⅱ. Four out of the 49 patients were associated with radial nerve palsy. All patients were treatedwith anterior plate fixation through the anterior approach to the humerus. The radial nerves injured were explored. Results Of the 49 patients, 48 were followed up 6 to 48 months(28.7 months on average). All fractures were healed within 3 to 9 months(4.7 months on average). Fixed plates of 37 patients out of the 49 were removed. No iatrogenic radial nerve injury occurred in the82 times of the operations among the 49 patients. Conclusion The treatment of middle and lower thirds fractures of humerus by anterior platefixation through the anterior approach to the humerus does not interfere with the fracture healing and can prevent the iatrogenic radial nerve injury.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures. MethodsBetween January 2012 and October 2013, 16 patients with anterior pelvic ring fractures were treated with MIPPO. There were 10 males and 6 females at the age of 20-63 years (mean, 41 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 9 cases and falling from height in 7 cases. The duration of injury to admission was 2 hours to 5 days (mean, 1 day). According to Tile classification, 8 cases were rated as type B2, 4 cases as type B3, 2 cases as type C1, and 2 cases as type C2. Of them, 2 cases had iliac wing fracture, and 4 cases had pelvic posterior ring fracture. The time from admission to operation was 3-12 days (mean, 6 days). ResultsThe bleeding volume was 60-120 mL (mean, 70 mL). All wounds healed by first intention. No postoperative complication of deep venous thrombosis or long-term continuous pain occurred. All cases were followed up 5-27 months (mean, 11.5 months). No clinical manifestation of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury or spermatic cord injury was found, and cremasteric reflex existed in males. All cases obtained bony union, and the healing time was 12-16 weeks (mean, 13 weeks). During the follow-up period, no loss of fracture reduction and no internal fixation loosening or broken were observed. According to Matta radiological evaluation criterion, 16 cases had anatomical reduction, and 3 cases had satisfactory reduction; according to Majeed scoring system of pelvic fracture, the results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 4 cases. ConclusionMIPPO for treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, few soft tissue complications, and low infection rate, and can get satisfactory short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of percutaneous cannulated screw (PCS) versus plate fixation (PF) in the treatment of ankle fractures. MethodsThe Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2014), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched up to May 28th 2014, for studies concerning the efficacy of percutaneous cannulated screw versus plate fixation for ankle fractures. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Result A total of 10 studies (3 RCTs and 7 CCTs) involving 627 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the PF group, the PCS group was superior in time of the operation (RCT:MD=-6.78, 95%CI -11.95 to -1.60, P=0.01; CCT:MD=-9.76, 95%CI -13.68 to -5.84, P<0.000 01), blood loss during the operation (RCT:MD=-36.14, 95%CI -40.02 to -32.17, P<0.000 01; CCT:MD=-34.80, 95%CI -37.78 to -31.81, P<0.000 01) and the time of the fracture healing (RCT:MD=-1.16, 95%CI -1.51 to -0.81, P<0.000 01; CCT:MD=-1.55, 95%CI -2.97 to -0.13, P=0.03); However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in complication rate (CCT:OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.08 to 2.81, P=0.41), AOFAS score excellent rate (RCT:OR=2.11, 95%CI 0.81 to 5.49, P=0.12; CCT:OR=1.58, 95%CI 0.75 to 3.30, P=0.23), and postoperative malleolus pain rate (CCT:OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.00 to 148.82, P=0.89). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that PCS is superior to PF in shorting time of the operation, reducing blood loss during the operation, and shorting time of the fracture healing. However, the complication rate, AOFAS score excellent rate, and postoperative malleolus pain rate are similar for each operation. Due to the quality limitation of the CCTs, the conclusion are needed to be verified by more high quality RCTs in future.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of lateral approach minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and helical plate MIPO in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Methods The clinical data of patients with proximal humeral shaft fractures who underwent MIPO via lateral approach (group A, 25 cases) and MIPO with helical plate (group B, 30 cases) between December 2009 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, American Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, and complications were compared between two groups. The angular deformity and the fracture healing were evaluated according to anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films postoperatively. The modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score for shoulder and the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score for elbow were analyzed at last follow-up. Results The operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P<0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times presented no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-90 months, with an average of 19.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the quality of postoperative fracture reduction, there were 4 (16.0%) and 11 (36.7%) patients with angulation deformity in group A and group B, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of angulation deformity (χ2=2.936, P=0.087). All fractures achieved bony union, there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between group A and group B (P>0.05); delayed union occurred in 2 cases and 1 case in group A and group B, respectively (healing time was 30, 42, and 36 weeks after operation, respectively). In group A and group B, 1 patient had superficial infection of incision, respectively; 2 patients and 1 patient had subacromial impact after operation, respectively; and 3 patients in group A had symptoms of radial nerve paralysis of different degrees; all of them were cured after symptomatic treatment. The overall complication incidence of group A (32%) was significantly higher than that of group B (10%) (χ2=4.125, P=0.042). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified UCLA score and MEPs score between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both lateral approach MIPO and helical plate MIPO can achieve satisfied effectiveness in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Lateral approach MIPO may be beneficial to shorten the operation time, while the overall complication incidence of helical plate MIPO is lower.
Objective To compare the effectiveness and shoulder function of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Methods Randomized controlled analysis was conducted on 68 patients over 70 years old with Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with RTSA or ORIF between January 2020 and June 2022. The patients were randomly divided into RTSA group (n=32) and ORIF group (n=36). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, injured side, Neer classification, and preoperative Charlson comorbidity index, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), and hemoglobin (Hb). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction of Hb on the 3rd day after operation, hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, complication incidence, range of motion of shoulder joint at 2 years after operation, VAS score before operation and at 5 days and 1 month after operation, Constant shoulder score and OSS score before operation and at 2 years after operation, and imaging results during follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with the ORIF group, the RTSA group had longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher total cost of hospitalization (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb reduction on the 3rd day after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 5 days and 1 month after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 26-35 months, with an average of 31.2 months. In the RTSA group, there were 2 cases of poor healing of superficial incision and 1 case of transient nerve injury. There was no complication such as bone resorption around the prosthesis, lucent band, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic fracture in all patients. In the ORIF group, there was 1 case of poor healing of superficial incision, 3 cases of nonunion of fracture, 1 case of arthritis secondary to humeral head necrosis, and 1 case of bone absorption of large tuberosity, and no displacement or fracture failure of internal fixation was found in all patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications [9.4% (3/32) vs 16.7% (6/36)] between the two groups [OR (95%CI): 0.828 (0.171, 4.014), P=0.814]. In the RTSA group, 28 cases were graded 0 and 4 cases were graded 1 at 2 years after operation. Constant and OSS scores of RTSA group were significantly better than those of ORIF group (P<0.05). The Constant score was significantly better than ORIF group in activity and strength, range of motion, lifting, abduction, and external rotation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in pain, daily function, and internal rotation between the two groups (P>0.05). The RTSA group had a significantly greater range of motion in lifting, abduction, and external rotation than ORIF group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in internal rotation between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionApplication of RTSA as the initial treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can achieve better rehabilitation of joint activity and lower risk of early reoperation, and improve the quality of life of elderly fracture patients. However, the difficulty of revision and the high cost of treatment require the surgeon to pay full attention and strictly grasp the indications.
Objective To investigate and compare the effects of restoring and maintaining the cervical curvature and height of the fused segment by using three different anterior cervical plate systems. Methods From January 2002 to June 2004, 122 patients underwent anterior cervical decompression,autogenous iliac bone graft and plate fixation. Of the 122 patients (85 males, 37 females, aged 14-70), 37 underwent surgery involving the fixation with the Orion plate system, 39 with the Zephir plate system, and 46 with the Codman platesystem. The cervical curvature and height of the fused segment were measured onthe lateral X-ray films so as to compare the changes of the conditions preoperatively,1 week after surgery, and during the follow-up, and also to compare the difference among the three groups. Results The follow-up of the patients for 6-35 months (average 17.3 months) showed that all the patients developed the bone fusion 6 months after operation. There was a significant improvement in the cervical curvature and height of the fused segment before operation versus 1 week after operation（Plt;0.05）; however, there were no significant changes 1 week after operation versus during the followup in each group（Pgt;0.05）; there was no significant difference among the three groups（Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The three plate systems can effectively reconstruct and maintain the cervical curvature and height of the fused segment, with a satisfactory effect in a short term.
Objective To compare the differences between volar and dorsal plate positions in the treatment of unstable fracture of distal radius. Methods From June 2000 to December 2006, 61 cases with fracture of distal radius weretreated, 27 males and 34 females aged 22-70 years (55.5 years on average), among which 18 cases were caused by traffic accidents and 43 cases falls. All cases were fresh closed fractures. All patients had AP and lateral X-ray films of the wrist preoperatively and 30 cases experienced CT scan. According to AO, there were 25 cases for B1, 18 for B2, 7 for B3, 7 for C1, and 4 for C2. All the cases were randomized into 2 groups: the wrist palmar group (group A, n=34) and dorsal group (group B, n=27), to perform volar and dorsal plate fixation, respectively. As to the measurement of fortune for the preoperative ruler and incl ination angle, group A were (—45.0 ± 53.0)º and (8.6 ± 3.1)º, respectively, and group B were (—40.0 ± 30.0)º and (7.3 ± 5.6)º, respectively. Preoperative radial shortened (12.0 ± 5.3) mm in group A, and (10.3 ± 4.2) mm in group B. Joint surface level was (4.3 ± 2.2) mm in group A, and (4.1 ± 3.3) mm in group B. Results All of the 61 cases were followed up for 6-27 months (16 months on verage). All the fractures were healed, the time to heal ing in group A was (8.2 ± 1.6) weeks, and in group B was (8.1 ± 1.2) weeks, and the difference was not significant (P gt; 0.05). As for the wrist function by Cartland-Werley scoring at the 8th week after operation, 7 cases were excellent, 10 good, and 17 poor in group A with the choiceness rate of 50.0%, while 7 cases were excellent, 11 good and 9 poor in group B with the choiceness rate of 66.7%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P lt; 0.01). And at the 24th week after operation, 21 cases were excellent, 9 good, and 4 poor in group A with the choiceness rate of 88.2%, while 18 cases were excellent, 5 good, and 4 poor in group B with the choiceness rate of 85.2%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). As for radiological assessment by Sarmiento, device and palm incl ination angles in group A were (9.5 ± 3.1)º and (18.0 ± 8.2)º, respectively, and in group B were (11.0 ± 4.7) º and (16.0 ± 7.6)º, respectively. No radial shortening was found either in group A or in group B, and joint surface level in both groups were less than 1 mm. There was no significant difference between group A and group B in terms of all indicators postoperatively (P gt; 0.05), but there was significant difference when compared with preoperation (P lt; 0.001). With regard to comparison of postoperative compl ications between the two groups, there was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in early postoperative compl ications, but there was in long-term compl ications (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The volar and dorsal plate positions may offer effective stabil ity for unstable distal radial fracture and early functional exercise. The volar plate position may influence the pronation function of the wris joint in the short run, while the dorsal plate position may cause more compl ications in the long run.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of anterior cervical plate internal fixation in the treatment of unstable Hangman fracture. MethodsBetween May 2006 and May 2010, 42 patients with unstable Hangman fracture were treated by anterior cervical plate internal fixation. There were 30 males and 12 females with an average age of 36.5 years (range, 22-64 years). According to the Levine-Edwards classification, 25 cases were rated as type Ⅱ, 15 cases as type Ⅱ A, and 2 cases as type Ⅲ. Eight patients had spinal cord injury. The average interval between injury and operation was 5 days (range, 3-14 days). The X-ray, CT, and MRI were done pre-and post-operatively to evaluate the cervical physiological curvature, the intervertebral disc height of C2,3, the fracture-healing, and bone fusion. The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) for occipito-cervical pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical spine function, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for neurological functional recovery. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. No neurological deterioration or internal fixation failure was observed. All of the patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.5 years). The complications were dysdipsia in 3 cases and dysphagia in 4 cases, which alleviated spontaneously after 1 week. All the patients were almost free from occipito-cervical pain and the limited cervical spine motion. Neurological function was improved in 8 cases of spinal cord injury, and complete decompression was observed in 6 cases who had spinal cord compression. The bone fusion was observed at 6.5 months on average (range, 6-8 months); the mean fracture-healing time was 10.5 months (range, 9-12 months). The VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were significantly improved at 3 months after operation and last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), significant improvement scores were achieved at last follow-up when compared with the scores at 3 months (P<0.05). The intervertebral disc height of C2,3, the reconstructed curvature and stability of the cervical spine, and the spine movement were good. ConclusionThe method of anterior cervical plate internal fixation can achieve satisfactory reduction and fusion, less complications, negligible impact on the cervical movement. So it is an ideal method to treat unstable Hangman fracture.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of anterior and lateral approaches of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. MethodsThe clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared from 35 cases of humeral shaft fractures between January 2010 and December 2012. The patients underwent MIPO by anterior approach in 17 patients (group A) and by lateral approach in 18 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury causes, type of fractures, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, fracture healing time, intra- or postoperative complications, and shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM) values were recorded and analyzed. The functions of the affected shoulder and elbow were assessed with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Mayo elbow performance score system respectively. ResultsThe operation time was (91.35±8.00) minutes and (95.56±7.92) minutes in groups A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-1.561, P=0.128). Incision healed by first intention in all patients of 2 groups. No iatrogenic radial nerve palsy occurred in group A, 2 cases had postoperative iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in group B, showing no significant difference (P=0.486). The patients were followed up 15.4 months on average (range, 11-24 months) in group A and 16.8 months on average (range, 10-23 months) in group B. The X-ray films showed bony healing in all patients. The fracture union time was (13.5±2.1) weeks in group A and (14.0±2.2) weeks in group B, showing no significant difference (t=-0.696, P=0.491). The UCLA scores were 33.4±1.9 in group A and 30.6±2.0 in group B, and the Mayo elbow performance scores were 100 in group A and 96.4±2.8 in group B; all showed significant differences (t=4.231, P=0.000; t=5.293, P=0.000). ConclusionGood clinical outcomes could be obtained when humeral shaft fractures are treated with MIPO either by anterior approach or by lateral apporach. However, anterior approach could offer better shoulder and elbow functional results.