Sedation and analgesia is an essential part of the emergency work. Presently, for adults, clinical assessment and application of sedation and analgesia has been gradually perfect, but in the face of pediatric patients, clinicians would always concern drug-related adverse reactions as well as a variety of uncontrollable factors, leading to reducing and even ignoring the sedation and analgesia in children. This review focuses on the current research status and relevant evidence of pediatric sedation depth and risk assessment, pain assessment, as well as the principles, application methods, advantages and disadvantages of various commonly used clinical drugs, and the aim is to provide evidence for higher quality sedation and analgesia for children.
目的:观察静脉应用小剂量氯胺酮超前镇痛法对接受腹腔镜下子宫切除手术患者术后疼痛及认知功能的影响。方法:38例择期接受腹腔镜下子宫切除术患者(ASA分级12)随机分为氯胺酮组和对照组。氯胺酮组于手术开始前5min静脉滴注氯胺酮015mg·kg-1,术中持续泵注3μg·kg-1·min-1至手术结束;对照组使用生理盐水。记录术中使用氯胺酮后心率,平均动脉压的变化;术后24h内静脉使用芬太尼的剂量,VAS疼痛评分,头晕、恶心、呕吐等不良反应,中枢神经系统症状以及术后2h患者认知功能。结果:两组患者在24h内静脉使用芬太尼的剂量,VAS疼痛评分,不良反应,中枢神经系统症状以及术后2h的认知功能方面没有统计学差异。〖HTH〗结论:〖HTSS〗静脉使用小剂量氯胺酮超前镇痛并不能减少术后芬太尼的用量,不能降低术后疼痛评分。尽管使用小剂量氯胺酮并没有增加患者术后的不良反应,也不影响患者术后认知功能障碍,不建议作为腹腔镜下子宫切除术患者常规使用。
目的 观察酒石酸布托啡诺与芬太尼合用于术后静脉自控镇痛（PCIA）的效果及最佳混合比例。 方法 2010年8月－2011年1月100例妇科手术患者，随机分为5组，每组20例。均全身麻醉术后采用负荷量+持续背景剂量+PCIA方案镇痛。根据不同配方分为F组：芬太尼1 mg+生理盐水至100 mL；B组：酒石酸布托啡诺10 mg+生理盐水至100 mL；BFⅠ组：芬太尼0.6 mg+酒石酸布托啡诺3 mg+生理盐水至90 mL；BFⅡ组：芬太尼0.5 mg+酒石酸布托啡诺5 mg+生理盐水至100 mL；BFⅢ组：芬太尼0.3 mg+酒石酸布托啡诺6 mg+生理盐水至90 mL。观察术后各时点视觉模拟评分（VAS）及镇静评分，患者满意度以及不良反应情况。 结果 术后早期BFⅢ组和B组VAS评分大于F组；镇静评分B组大于F组；B组满意度优良率小于其余各组；恶心呕吐发生率F组高于BFⅠ组及BFⅡ组。 结论 酒石酸布托啡诺和芬太尼合用于PCIA，镇痛效果确切，不良反应发生率低。推荐配比：BFⅠ组和BFⅡ组。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of intravertebral analgesia for external cephalic version. Methods We electronically searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), PubMed (1980 to 2009), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to 2009), Ovid EBM Database (1991 to 2009), EMbase (1980 to 2009), CBM (1978 to 2009) and CNKI (1979 to 2009) to collect literature about intravertebral analgesia for external cephalic version. We screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies, and then performed meta-analyses by using RevMan 5.0.13 software. Results Seven RCTs involving 620 women met the inclusion criteria. Five trials were of relatively high quality, and 1 of low quality and 2 not clear. The result of meta-analyses showed that intravertebral analgesia was superior in external cephalic version with a RR 1.53 and 95%CI 1.24 to 1.88. Conclusion Intravertebral analgesia can increase the successful rate of external cephalic version in the treatment of breech presentation compared with intravenous medicine for systematic use or no analgesia.
目的 探讨围手术期超前平衡镇痛在肛肠手术中止痛的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2009年11月至2010年10月期间巴中市中医院肛肠科123例采用腰俞穴麻醉的肛肠手术患者的临床资料，患者被分成超前平衡镇痛组（60例）和传统镇痛组（63例）2组。2组术前准备相同，术后均口服布洛芬缓释胶囊300mg止痛，2次/d。对Ⅲ～Ⅳ度内痔及内括约肌痉挛的患者术中均常规行内括约肌松解术，对VAS评分6分以上的患者选择使用盐酸曲马多注射止痛。超前平衡镇痛组术前0.5h肌注安定10mg，口服布洛芬缓释胶囊300mg，术中采用2%盐酸利多卡因5ml、0.75%盐酸布比卡因5ml、芬太尼50 μg、地塞米松5mg用生理盐水稀释成20ml行腰俞穴麻醉并止痛，术毕肛内塞用双氯芬酸钠栓1枚。传统镇痛组术中采用2%盐酸利多卡因5ml、0.75%盐酸布比卡因5ml用生理盐水稀释成20ml行腰俞穴麻醉。比较2组术后4、6、8、12、24及48 h VAS评分、盐酸曲马多使用率及恶心、呕吐及尿潴留的发生率。结果 术后4、6、8、12、24及48 h VAS评分超前平衡镇痛组均明显低于传统镇痛组（P＜0.01），术后盐酸曲马多使用率超前平衡镇痛组明显低于传统镇痛组（P＜0.05），恶心、呕吐及尿潴留的发生率2组比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 围手术期超前平衡镇痛用于肛肠手术止痛是一种疗效肯定、安全、不良反应少而又简单易行的镇痛方法。
Objective To summarize the research progress of the analgesic effect of adductor canal block (ACB) applied to knee arthroplasty, in order to find the ACB mode that can obtain better effectiveness. MethodsThe research progress of the analgesic effect of ACB after knee arthroplasty was reviewed by widely consulting the related literature on ACB at home and abroad in recent years. Results In recent years, multimodal analgesia has become the mainstay of postoperative pain management after knee arthroplasty. Among these, ACB replaces the once “gold standard” femoral nerve block (FNB) by offering comparable and effective analgesia with better preservation of quadriceps function. It is generally safe and efficient to use 0.2% ropivacaine ACB with initial loading doses of 15-30 mL and continual loading doses of less than 8 mL/hour to give analgesia comparable to FNB with minimal impact on lower extremity muscular strength. However, the risk of patient falls must still be taken into consideration by medical staff. Adjuvants like dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone used in ACB can increase the analgesic duration and postoperative analgesic impact. As a perineural adjunct for ACB, 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine may strike a balance between safety and analgesic efficacy. Conclusion ACB is a safe and effective analgesia method after knee arthroplasty. The adductor canal anatomy, the optimum blocking strategy and blocking site of ACB are all hotly debated and still require additional study due to the significant variety of the nerve structures in adductor canal.
ObjectiveTo investigate the use of opioid analgesics during the postoperative hospitalization in patients undergoing lung resection and analyse its influencing factors.MethodsThe clinical data of 450 patients undergoing lung resection in Sichuan Cancer Hospital among a multicenter symptom research database (CN-PRO-Lung 1) between November 2017 and January 2020 were analyzed. There were 248 males and 202 females with an average age of 54.7±10.3 years.ResultsA total of 448 (99.6%) patients used opioid analgesics. The average daily morphine equivalent dose during the postoperative hospitalization was 48.9 mg. There were statistical differences in postoperative morphine equivalent dose across patients with different sex, age, highest level of education, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, surgical approach, surgical type, operative time, postoperative hospital stay and grade of postoperative complications (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that sex, surgical approach and postoperative hospital stay were independent influencing factors for morphine use during the postoperative hospitalization in patients undergoing lung resection (all P<0.05).ConclusionIn clinical practice, attention should be paid to postoperative pain for male patients, as well as to promote the application of minimally invasive surgery, and to shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay, in order to ultimately reduce the use of opioids.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl used in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.MethodsAn online search of computerized searches of the database of MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and SinoMed were conducted. Randomized controlled trials published since the inceptions of these databases until April 1st 2018, involving the comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl for PCIA after cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the fentanyl group, the sufentanil group had statistically significant lower VAS scores at 4-hour (MD=–0.99, 95%CI –1.03 to –0.95, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.40 to –0.21, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=–0.54, 95%CI –0.62 to –0.46, P<0.001) and 24-hour (MD=–0.35, 95%CI –0.41 to –0.28, P<0.001); statistically significant higher Ramsay scores at 4-hour (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.78, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=0.93, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=0.98, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.05, P<0.001), 24-hour (MD=0.07, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11, P=0.000 5), 48-hour (MD=0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, P<0.000 1). As for the adverse reactions, sufentanil group had lower risks of having nausea and vomiting (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.31, P<0.001), pruritus (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.001), dizziness (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.44, P<0.001) and urinary retention (RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.15, 0.82), P=0.02).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that, sufentanil has better analgesia and sedative effects, and less risks of adverse reactions for safer clinical use.
Objectives To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of safety of femoral nerve block (FNB) used as a postoperative analgesic technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and used AMSTAR to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. The major indexes used to evaluate the safety of FNB were the incidence rates of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, sedation, retention of urine, dizziness, pruritus, hypotension, falls, nenous thromboembolism and deep infection. Results A total of 12 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included.They assessed the safety of FNB compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA), periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI), epidural analgesia (EA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of opioids (PCA) and adductor canal block (ACB), respectively. The methodological quality of included studies were medium, with the scores between 3 to 10. The results of overview indicated that: FNB had lower incidence rates of nausea and vomiting compared with EA and PCA, but had higher than ACB. FNB had lower incidence rates of sedation and retention of urine compared with EA and PCA. FNB had lower incidence rates of dizziness compared with EA and PCA, and lower incidence rate of hypotension compared with EA. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that FNB is safer than EA and PCA. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo review the advances in perioperative pain management of pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity corrective surgery.MethodsRegular analgesics, drug administrations, and analgesic regimens were reviewed and summarized by consulting domestic and overseas related literatures about perioperative pain management of pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity corrective surgery in recent years.ResultsAs for perioperative analgesis regimens of pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity corrective surgery, regular analgesics include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, antiepileptic drugs, adrenergic agonists, and local anesthetic, etc. Besides drug administration by mouth, intravenous injection, and intramuscular injection, the administration also includes patient controlled analgesia, epidural injection, and intrathecal injection. Multimodal analgesia is the most important regimen currently.ConclusionHeretofore, a number of perioperative pain managements of pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity corrective surgery have been applied clinically, but the ideal regimen has not been developed. To design a safe and effective analgesic regimen needs further investigations.