目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效和手术安全性。方法回顾性分析2010年7~12月期间的50例LA患者的临床资料，与同期55例施行OA的患者进行比较。结果LA组与OA组在手术时间及术中出血量方面差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); LA组术后肠功能恢复时间、下床活动时间及住院时间均明显短于OA组(Plt;0.05)，LA组镇痛药使用率及术后并发症发生率明显少于OA组(Plt;0.05); 但住院费用LA 组高于OA组(Plt;0.05)。结论LA在治疗阑尾炎方面有明显优势，值得推广。
目的通过对247例小切口阑尾切除术临床体会的总结，探讨以小切口作阑尾切除术的优点、手术适应证、禁忌证以及手术注意事项。方法对247例小切口阑尾切除术病例在手术要点、手术时间、切口长度、术后恢复情况、并发症等方面进行分析，结合文献资料加以总结。结果在手术中开腹、寻找阑尾及关腹均有其特定要求； 手术时间平均18 min，术后拆线及术后住院时间平均分别为4.8 d和4.6 d； 伤口愈合： 甲级235例，乙级9例，丙级2例。结论小切口阑尾切除术具有切口小、外观美、创伤小、恢复快以及经济节省、加快病床周转等诸多优点，是一个值得推广的手术。
的报道楔形切开浆肌层的全阑尾切除术的临床应用体会。方法对72例根部肿胀增粗、坏疽穿孔合并盲肠壁增厚的急、慢性阑尾炎，从基底部楔形切开盲肠浆肌层，进行全阑尾切除术。结果该72例中无一例发生粪瘘、残端出血、残株炎及肠粘连等并发症。 结论合理应用从基底部楔形切开盲肠浆肌层的全阑尾切除术可有效预防根部肿胀增粗、坏疽穿孔的阑尾切除术后的粪瘘、残端出血、残株炎及肠粘连等并发症。
目的探讨阑尾切除术后腹腔引流放置与否对切口感染的影响。方法回顾性分析1 719例阑尾手术的引流情况和切口感染情况。结果引流组切口感染率为50.93%，未引流组为3.17%(Plt;0.005)。其中单纯性阑尾炎引流组感染率为33.33%，未引流组为1.66%； 化脓性阑尾炎引流组感染率为46.43%，未引流组为3.12%； 坏疽性阑尾炎引流组感染率为56.25%，未引流组为20.00%； 穿孔性阑尾炎引流组感染率为54.95%，未引流组为23.08%。结论无论何种类型阑尾炎，术后放置腹腔内引流均可能增加切口感染。
【摘要】 目的 探讨腹部手术史对急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）的影响。 方法 2005年1月-2010年9月，将既往有腹部手术史并行LA的111例患者纳入观察组，同期随机抽取无腹部手术史行LA的220例患者纳入对照组。入选患者排除多次手术史、免疫功能低下、肝肾功能不全及血液病。比较两组中转开腹率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症及住院时间的差异。 结果 两组均未出现术中并发症及死亡，两组患者的中转开腹率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症及住院时间比较，差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 即往腹部手术史对急性阑尾炎LA没有明显影响。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of previous abdominal surgery on appendectomy under laparoscope for acute appendicitis. Methods From January 2005 to September 2010, 111 patients with a history of abdominal surgery who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy due to acute appendicitis were in the observe group and 220 patients selected randomly from the patients without a history of previous abdominal surgery who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy were in the control group. The patients with a history of multiple operations, immunodeficiency, liver and kidney dysfunction, and hematopathy were excluded. The data were collected retrospectively and the differences of conversion rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital staying were compared between the two groups. Results There were no death or intraoperative complications in both of the two groups. The differences in the conversion rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complication rates, and hospital staying between the two groups were not significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Previous abdominal surgery has no significant effect on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.
摘要:目的: 探讨在阑尾切除术中应用抗菌薇乔缝线以减少阑尾切口感染的可能性。 方法 : 将我院2007年4月至2009年3月所有阑尾切除术病例1425例随机分为抗菌薇乔缝线组和丝线组,比较其切口感染发生率。 结果 : 统计中按阑尾未穿孔、阑尾穿孔以及总计分别计算切口感染率,在抗菌微乔线组感染率分别为017%、072%、028%,丝线组分别为154%、781%、267%,两组间分别予以X2检验,其〖WTBX〗P 值均小于001,具有显著性差异。 结论 : 缝线是辅助产生切口感染的一个危险因素,在阑尾切除术中使用抗菌薇乔缝线可以显著降低切口感染率。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the application of Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture in order to reduce the possibility of infection of appendectomy incision. Methods : Hospital from April 2007 to March 2009 appendectomy patients in all 1425 cases were randomly divided into Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture group and silk group,compared to the incidence of incision infection. Results : The statistics are not in accordance with perforated appendicitis, perforated appendicitis, as well as calculation of the total, respectively, incision infection, the infection rate in the Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture group were 017%, 072%, 028%, silk group were 154%, 781%, 267% between the two groups separately X2 test, the P value of less than 001, with a significant difference. Conclusion : The suture is to assist the incision produced a risk factor for infection in appendectomy,Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture can be used in a significant reduction in incision infection rates.