Objective To evaluate the effectivenss of Chinese herbal retention enema in viral hepatitis patients. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane library, PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched from the inception to December, 2011 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Chinese herbal retention enema in treating viral hepatitis, and the references of the included literature were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated and cross-checked the methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 20 RCTs involving 1 735 patients were included. The subgroup analyses based on the length of intervention time showed that: a) after 2-week intervention: the overall effective rate of the Chinese herbal retention enema group was higher than that of the control group, with a significant difference (OR=3.19, 95%CI 1.87 to 5.44, Plt;0.000 1). Compared with the control group, the Chinese herbal retention enema group better promoted the recovery of liver function by more reduction of AST (MD= ?82.50, 95%CI ?145.66 to ?19.34, P=0.01), ALT (MD= ?44.78, 95%CI 65.90 to ?23.66, Plt;0.000 1) and TBIL (MD= ?37.51, 95%CI ?74.07 to ?0.95, Plt;0.0001). b) After 1-month intervention: The overall effective rate of the Chinese herbal retention enema group was higher than that of the control group, with a significant difference (OR=4.17, 95%CI 2.37 to 7.32, Plt;0.000 01). Compared with the control group, the Chinese herbal retention enema group better promoted the recovery of liver function by more reduction of AST (MD= ?17.86, 95%CI ?29.97 to ?5.76, P=0.004), ALT (MD= ?27.84, 95%CI ?42.45 to ?13.24, P=0.000 2), and TBIL (MD= ?54.15, 95%CI ?116.52 to ?8.23, P=0.09). Conclusion Chinese herbal retention enema can improve the overall effective rate for viral hepatitis patients, alleviate virus damage to liver cell and promote liver function recovery. The commonly used Chinese medicinals for enema are Radix et Rhizoma Rhei, Herba Artemisiae Capillaris, Salvia miltiorrhiza, and Radix Paeoniae Rubra.
Objective To evaluate reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China. Methods CNKI database was searched for systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field from the establishment date to December 2011. Two reviewers independently identified the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then extracted the data using Excel software. The PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists were used to assess reporting characteristics and methodological quality, respectively. Results A total of 63 systematic reviews or meta-analyses involving 21 systematic reviews and 42 meta-analyses were identified. These articles were published on 13 journals such as The Chinese Nursing Research, the Chinese Journal of Nursing, and the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. The deficiencies of methodological quality mainly contained literature search, heterogeneity handling, recognition and assessment of publication bias. In addition, the deficiencies of reporting characteristics were reflected on incomplete reporting of literature search, quality assessment, risk of bias and results (some studies lacked forest plot, estimated value of pooled results, 95%CI or heterogeneity). Conclusion As a whole, the included reviews and meta-analyses have more or less flaws with regard to the quality of reporting and methodology based on the PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists. Focusing on the improvement of reporting and methodological quality of systematic review or meta-analysis in nursing field in China is urgently needed in order to increase the value of these studies.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of western conventional treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine retention enema on patients with hepatic encephalopathy. MethodsSuch databases as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Database were searched from the inception to November 2013 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Western conventional treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine retention enema to treat hepatic encephalopathy, and the references of the included literature were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated and cross-checked the methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 26 RCTs involving 1 691 patients were included. The subgroup analyses based on the length of intervention time showed that when the course of treatment intervention was less than one, the overall effective rate of the Chinese herbal retention enema group was higher than that of the control group, with a significant difference[RR=1.34, 95%CI (1.25, 1.44), P<0.000 01]; after more than one course of treatment intervention, the overall effective rate of the Chinese herbal retention enema group was higher than that of the control group, with a significant difference[RR=1.34, 95%CI (1.21, 1.48), P<0.000 01]. ConclusionOn the basis of available evidence, the western medicine treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine retention enema for hepatic encephalopathy has a certain effect. However, the heterogeneity among the included studies is large. It is necessary to design multicenter, strictly randomized and double-blind test controlled trials with large samples to validate these conclusions and to further confirm the clinical curative effect.
Objective To evaluate the quality of evidence of systematic reviews or meta-analyses regarding outcomes in nursing field in China using the Grade system, so as to get known of the status of the quality of evidence and promote the application of the evaluation of the quality of evidence of systematic reviews. Methods The quality of evidence regarding the included outcomes was input, extracted and qualitatively graded, using GRADEpro 3.6 software. Then, we carefully analyzed and elaborated the factors of downgrading and upgrading that affects the quality of evidence in the process of evaluation. Results 53 systematic reviews or meta-analyses involving 188 outcomes were identified and evaluated. The results showed that high, moderate, low and very low levels of quality of evidence were 2.7%, 27.1%, 51.1%, and 19.1%, respectively; and low-level quality of evidence accounted for the most. Conclusion The quality of evidence produced by systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China is poor and urgently needs improvement. The reviewers should abide by the methodological standards in the process of making systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The quality of evidence in terms of each outcome should be evaluated and fully reported.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of early moxibustion therapy on the recovery of gastrointestinal functioning after gastrointestinal surgery. MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to Jan. 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs about early moxibustion therapy on the recovery of gastrointestinal functioning. Two reviewer independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 softwares. ResultsA total of nine RCTs and four quasi-RCTs involving 1444 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, the early moxibustion therapy group was significantly superior to the control group in total effective rate (OR=1.26, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.36, P<0.00001), the time to first bowel motion (MD=-11.79, 95%CI -13.79 to -9.78, P<0.00001), the time to first flatus (MD=-15.13, 95%CI -17.40 to -12.85, P<0.00001) and the time to first passage of feces (MD=-34.93, 95%CI -59.33 to -10.53, P=0.005). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that early moxibustion therapy after gastrointestinal surgery is beneficial for promoting the recovery of gastrointestinal functioning. In addition, due to the low methodological quality of included studies, larger sample, high-quality RCTs are needed to prove the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the methods of clinical practice guidelines for integration traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and western medicine (WM), in order to benefit the integration of TCM and WM in the future. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data,VIP databases, Yimaitong website, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) were electronically searched to collect clinical practice guidelines of integrated TCM and WM. The search time limit was from the inception of the database to July 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and then, descriptive analysis was performed using qualitative methods. ResultsA total of 54 guidelines were included. There were 25 guidelines that adopted the "combination of disease and syndrome" model of integrated TCM and WM, among which 20 adopted the "combination of disease period and syndrome" model, and the number of these guidelines increased with the time sequence. Among the 26 guidelines that provide ideas for the integration of TCM and WM, 22 guidelines clarify the relationship between the application of TCM and WM, among which 5 guidelines have A grade of quality evaluation, and a total of 61 articles were extracted to clarify the relationship between TCM and WM. ConclusionAt the present stage, the recommendations of TCM and WM in most guidelines of integrated TCM and WM are still independent of each other, and there is no special thinking and research on how to integrate TCM and WM evidence organically to generate recommendations with important guiding value for actual diagnosis and treatment, which is difficult to truly guide clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of Tiao-She nursing of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for mild cognitive disorder (MCD), and to provide theoretical basis for developing evidence-based guideline of Tiao-She nursing of TCM. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, MEDLINE, Springerlink, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs), as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), up to December 2014. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. Methodological quality and evidence quality of included SRs/MAs were assessed using AMSTAR scale and GRADE tool, respectively. Methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed using risk of bias assessment tool of the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. ResultsNine RCTs were identified, but no SRs/MAs was retrieved. Interventions for MCD included acupoint massage, moxibustion, auricular-plaster therapy, qigong, Tai chi, calligraphy, and food therapy of ginseng. All included RCTs showed that Tiao-She nursing of TCM was effective on cognitive ability and psychosocial function. ConclusionTiao-She nursing of TCM might be effective and safe, and the methods are variable. Due to the limitation of the quality of included RCTs, the efficacy and safety of Tiao-She nursing of TCM for MCD are still needed to be verified by high quality studies.
The metacor, which is developed based on the classical frequentist theory, is a specified package for performing meta-analysis of correlation coefficients in R software. This package was officially launched in 2011. Based on the DerSimonian-Laird method and Olkin-Pratt method, correlation coefficients can be directly pooled by using this package. The metacor package also can be used to draw the forest plot and is easy to use; however, it still needs to be improved. This paper briefly introduced how to perform a meta-analysis of correlation coefficients using the metacor package in R software through an example.
Meta-analysis has been regarded as the critical tool of assisting the healthcare professionals to make decisions. And the theory of evidence-based medicine is widely disseminated in domestic. However, it must be noted that the increasing number of meta-analyses causes a fact that several meta-analyses investigating the same or similar clinical questions were captured commonly. More importantly, the results from these meta-analyses are often conflicting. Consequently, decision-making of those healthcare professionals who depend on those results become a thorny thing. To address this issue, Jadad et al. from McMaster University proposed an adjunct algorithm to help healthcare professionals to select the best result from conflicting meta-analyses to make decisions properly. Our article will introduce the tool briefly and explain the process of it with an example.
Cumulative meta-analysis could help researchers to justify the effectiveness of the intervention and whether the obtained evidence is sufficient. However, the process of the meta-analysis does not adjust the repeated testing of the null hypothesis and neither quantifies the statistical power. The sequential meta-analysis has solved the aforementioned problems and has been widely used in the clinical practice and decision-making. Currently several methods of sequential meta-analysis have been proposed and these methods differ from each other. Of which, the methodology of trial sequential (TSA) is well developed and corresponding performance is relatively easy; the methodology of double-triangular test of Whitehead is lagged than TSA and its performance is relatively difficult; the approach of semi-Bayes refers to the theory of Bayes and it's very difficult to generalize. Our paper aimed to give a brief introduction of the methodology of the sequential meta-analysis.