west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "预防性抗生素" 5 results
  • Progress in Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

    Abstract: Appropriate prophylactic administration of antibiotics for thoracic and cardiovascular surgical procedure can reduce postoperative morbidity and decrease the overall cost due to infections. Prophylactic antibiotics should be given within 30 minutes preceding incision intravascularly. Serum levels of free drug above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for common contaminating bacteria should be maintained for the entire surgical period. Prophylactic antibiotics after operation are useless for patients without risk factors predisposing to postoperative infection. Heart and(or) lung transplant patients should be given antiviral and antifungal prophylaxis. Selection of antibiotics must be based on the pharmacokinetic, pharcodynamic and pharmacoeconomic properties of antibiotics and features of surgery. The policy of antibiotic prophylaxis must be modified in response to alterations in antibiotic resistance pattern which is constantly changing in hospital.

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:15 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单剂头孢曲松预防肺手术后感染

    目的 比较预防性使用单剂头孢曲松和四剂头孢曲松对肺手术后感染的效果,论证单剂头孢曲松预防方案的临床价值。方法 223例肺手术患者随机分成单剂头孢曲松组(单剂组,n=110)和四剂头孢曲松组(四剂组,n=113)进行临床对照研究。结果 单剂组的术后感染率(2%)明显低于四剂组(8%),差别具有显著性意义(Plt;0.05),而两组的平均住院时间和平均术后住院时间差别均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论 单剂头孢曲松是一种较理想的肺手术预防性抗生素方案。

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:33 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Preventing Meningitis in Patients With Basilar Skull Fractures: A Systematic Review

    Objectives We tended to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics for preventing meningitis in patients with BSF. Method We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2005), EMBASE (1974 to June 2005), and LILACS (1982 to September 2005). We also performed an electronic search of meeting proceedings from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (1997 to September 2005) and handsearched the abstracts of meeting proceedings of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (1995, 1999 and 2003). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antibiotic versus placebo or no intervention were identified. We also identified non-RCTs to perform a separate meta-analysis to compare results. At least two authors independently appraised the quality and extracted the data of each trial. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 4.2 software. Results Five RCTs and 17 non-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention in patients with BSF were identified. Most trials presented insufficient methodological detail. All studies included meningitis in their primary outcome. Overall, we evaluated 208 participants from the four RCTs that were considered suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between antibiotic prophylaxis groups and control groups in terms of reduction of the frequency of meningitis, all-cause mortality, meningitis-related mortality, and need for surgical correction in patients with CSF leakage. We performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate the primary outcome in patients with and without CSF leakage. We also completed a meta-analysis of all the identified controlled non-RCTs (enrolling a total of 2 168 patients), producing results consistent with the randomised data. Conclusions Currently available evidence from RCTs does not support prophylactic antibiotic use in patients with BSF, whether there is evidence of CSF leakage or not. Until more research is completed, the effectiveness of antibiotics in patients with BSF cannot be determined because studies published to date are flawed by biases. Large, appropriately designed RCTs are needed.

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Attention to Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Infections

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 预防性抗生素应用在日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术部位感染的作用

    目的探讨常规预防性抗生素应用是否有效预防日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术后手术部位感染,以及围手术期不使用抗生素的安全性、可行性。 方法纳入2013年1月-12月收治的胆囊疾病患者500例。预防使用抗生素组(A组)228例,无抗生素使用组(B组)272例,均采用全身麻醉,日间手术模式进行收治,观察两组外科手术部位感染和预后情况。 结果全部患者均术后第1天出院。A组2例(0.9%)发生手术切口感染,B组3例(1.1%)发生切口感染,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组1例剑突下切口红斑,经口服抗生素治疗好转;另外1例切口感染裂开,经连续换药5 d切口愈合。B组2例发生切口红肿,经口服抗生素治愈;另外1例发生切口下积液,经拆除缝线,每天换药,7 d后切口愈合。所有患者均无肝下积液、肺部感染以及泌尿道感染等。 结论单次剂量抗生素预防性使用并不能降低日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术后外科手术部位感染发生率。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content