ObjectiveTo explore the incidence and influencing factors of moderate-to-poor quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). MethodsA secondary analysis was conducted based on data from a randomized controlled study on the effects of different anesthesia methods on postoperative pulmonary complications after MIE. Patients who underwent elective MIE at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May 2019 to December 2021 were included. The QoR-15 scale was used to assess the QoR 30 days postoperatively, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting moderate-to-poor QoR (defined as a QoR-15 score≤121). ResultsA total of 541 patients were included, including 426 males and 115 females, with an average age of (63.0±8.3) years. At 30 days postoperatively, the numbers of patients with excellent, good, moderate, and poor QoR were 101 (18.7%), 273 (50.5%), 147 (27.2%), and 20 (3.7%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative pain [OR=1.527, 95%CI (1.032, 2.258), P=0.034] and a nutrition risk screening-2002 score≥3 [OR=1.617, 95%CI (1.069, 2.447), P=0.023] were influencing factors for moderate-to-poor QoR 30 days postoperatively. ConclusionAbout 30.9% of patients undergoing MIE have a moderate-to-poor QoR 30 days postoperatively. Improving preoperative pain management and nutritional status may enhance postoperative QoR.
ObjectiveTo explore the application effects of hand-sewn layered anastomosis (HS) and circular stapled anastomosis (CS) in inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronous laparoscopic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. MethodsPatients who underwent inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronous laparoscopic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from 2018 to 2019 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into a HS group and a CS group according to the anastomosis methods, and propensity score matching was used to match patients at a ratio of 1:1. The baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative indicators, CD4+/CD8+ immune index comparison, pain, various lung function indicators, incidence of short-term and long-term postoperative complications, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 153 patients were included, including 108 males and 45 females, with an average age of (61.81±5.18) years. After propensity score matching, 70 patients were included in each group. Compared with the CS group, the operation time was longer in the HS group [(107.10±8.25) min vs. (97.65±6.85) min, P<0.001]; the CD4+/CD8+ level was lower in the HS group 1-3 days after surgery; the pain score was higher, and various lung function indicators (forced expiratory volume in the first second, forced vital capacity, and one-second rate) were lower in the HS group 1-7 days after surgery; within 6 months after surgery, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic fistula, and gastroesophageal reflux) was lower in the HS group; and the quality of life score was higher in the HS group from 14 days to 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). ConclusionHS can reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula, anastomotic stenosis, and gastroesophageal reflux, and improve the short-term quality of life of patients, but it has a longer operation time, more intense short-term postoperative pain, and may affect the early recovery of lung function. HS and CS are complementary, and the appropriate surgical method should be chosen according to the individual situation of the patient to achieve the maximum clinical benefit.
Objective To evaluate the characteristics and reasons of complications in the patients with thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 165 patients with thoracoscopic esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2013 through January 2015. There were 102 males and 63 females at average age of 67.9±8.3 years. Results The operation time was 275.3±50.2 min. The intraoperative blood loss was 230.0±110.5 ml. The number of lymph node dissection was 18.1±6.5. The volume of drainage in thoracic cavity was 750±550 ml on the third day after operation. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy surgeries were successful except that 13 patients (7.8%) converted to open operation including 6 patients (4.2%) with severe pleural adhesion, 2 patients (1.2%) with hemorrhage, 2 patients (1.2%) with arrhythmia, and 3 patients (1.8%) with abnormal oxygenation. There were 17 patients (10.8%) were with intraoperative complications including 2 patients (1.2%) with arrhythmia, 3 patients (1.8%) with abnormal oxygenation, 7 patients (4.2%) with hemorrhage caused by vascular injury, 4 patients (2.4%) with thoracic duct injury, 1 patient (0.6%) with recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Moreover, 46 patients (27.8%) experienced postoperative complications including 23 patients (13.9%) with pulmonary infection, 6 patients (3.6%) with hoarseness, 4 patients (2.4%) with anastomotic leakage, 3 patients (1.8%) with incision infection, 2 patients (1.2%) with tracheoesophageal fistula, and 2 patients (1.2%) with pneumothorax. Unexpectedly, five patients underwent re-operation due to chylothorax (n=3, 1.8%) and hemorrhage (n=2, 1.2%). One patient (0.06%) died of acute pulmonary embolism. Conclusion Serious adhesion in abdominal cavity, abnormal of lung and heart. And bleeding are the main reasons caused transferring open thoracic surgery operation in patients with thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Lung infection, hoarseness, and anastomotic leakage of neck are the most common postoperative complications. And acute pulmonary embolism is the main cause of postoperative death. Proper precautions to decrease the morbidity of complication are necessary.
Objective To classify the postoperative complications (POCs) in patients receiving esophagectomy and find risk factors of different grades of complications. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 298 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy from January 2012 to August 2015 in our hospital. According to the postoperative complications, they were divided into two groups: the complication group (n=113) and the non-complication group (n=185). In the complications group, there were 86 males and 27 females with an average age of 61.42±7.81 years. There were 150 males and 35 females with an average age of 60.39±7.76 years in the non-complication group. The POCs were classified by Clavien-Dindo system. All possible factors influencing the occurrence of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for seeking independent risk factors of POCs. Results The incidence of grade Ⅱ POCs was 29.87% (89/298), 5.37% (16/298) for grade Ⅲ and 2.68% (8/298) for grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ. The most common POC was lung infection with the incidence of 13.76%. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed the operation duration and the number of lymph node dissection were the independent risk factors of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs. Conclusion Postoperative lung infection is the major complication in patients receiving esophagectomy. The operation duration and the number of lymph node dissection are the independent risk factors of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect the clinical effects of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal nutrition tube after radical resection of esophageal cancer from inception to October 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsTwenty-six articles were included, including 17 randomized controlled studies and 9 cohort studies, with a total of 35 808 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that: in the jejunostomy tube group, the postoperative exhaust time (MD=–4.27, 95%CI –5.87 to –2.66, P=0.001), the incidence of pulmonary infection (OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.82, P=0.02), incidence of tube removal (OR=0.11, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.30, P=0.001), incidence of tube blockage (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.97, P=0.04), incidence of nasopharyngeal discomfort (OR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.13, P=0.001), the incidence of nasopharyngeal mucosal damage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.42, P=0.008), the incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR=0.20, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.47, P=0.003) were significantly shorter or lower than those of the nasojejunal tube group. The postoperative serum albumin level (MD=5.75, 95%CI 5.34 to 6.16, P=0.001) was significantly better than that of the nasojejunal tube group. However, the intraoperative operation time of the jejunostomy tube group (MD=13.65, 95%CI 2.32 to 24.98, P=0.02) and the indent time of the postoperative nutrition tube (MD=17.81, 95%CI 12.71 to 22.91, P=0.001) were longer than those of the nasojejunal nutrition tube. At the same time, the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction (OR=6.08, 95%CI 2.55 to 14.50, P=0.001) was significantly higher than that of the nasojejunal tube group. There were no statistical differences in the length of postoperative hospital stay or the occurrence of anastomotic fistula between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the process of enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer, jejunostomy tube has better clinical treatment effect and is more comfortable during catheterization, but the incidence of intestinal obstruction is higher than that of traditional nasojejunal tube.
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of high BMI on postoperative complications in a cohort of squamous esophageal cancer patients. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 450 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy in our hospital from September 2010 through November 2012 year. The patients were divided into three groups. Forty-five patients were classified as a low BMI group (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), 304 patients were classified as a normal BMI group (18.5≤BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), and 101 patients as a high BMI group (BMI≥25.0 kg/m2). Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared among the three groups. ResultsThe comorbidity of diabetes was higher in the high BMI group compared with the other two groups (P=0.025). Longer operative time, wound infection or delayed healing were more frequent in the high BMI group (P=0.010 and P=0.039, respectively). Pneumonia and length of hospital stay had a tendency to increase in the high BMI group (P=0.052 and P=0.081, respectively). However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistical difference in pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, anastomotic leakage, vocal code paresis, chylothorax, other organ damage, reoperation, arrhythmia, or in-hospital mortality among the three groups. ConclusionsHigh BMI has a negative impact on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy. However, overweight is not a postoperative complications which should always be paid attention to.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic survival status and influence factors for surgical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in pathological stage T1b (pT1b).MethodsThe patients with ESCC in pT1b undergoing Ivor-Lewis or McKeown esophagectomy in Lanzhou University Second Hospital from 2012 to 2015 were collected, including 78 males (78.3%) and 17 females (21.7%) with an average age of 61.4±7.4 years.ResultsThe most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (15.8%), anastomotic leakage (12.6%) and arrhythmia (8.4%). Ninety-three (97.9%) patients underwent R0 resection, with an average number of lymph node dissections of 14.4±5.6. The rate of lymph node metastasis was 22.1%, and the incidence of lymph vessel invasion was 13.7%. The median follow-up time was 60.4 months, during which 25 patients died and 27 patients relapsed. The overall survival rate at 3 years was 86.3%, and at 5 years was 72.7%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (P=0.012, HR=2.60, 95%CI 1.23-5.50) and lympovascular invasion (P=0.014, HR=2.73, 95%CI 1.22-6.09) were independent risk factors for overall survival of pT1b ESCC.ConclusionEsophagectomy via right chest approach combined with two-fields lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible for patients with pT1b ESCC. The progress of pT1b ESCC with lymph node metastasis or lymphovascular invasion is relatively poor.