ObjectiveTo introduce the surgery method to reset and fix tibial plateau fracture without opening joint capsule, and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this method. MethodsBetween July 2011 and July 2013, 51 patients with tibial plateau fracture accorded with the inclusion criteria were included. All of 51 patients, 17 cases underwent open reduction and internal fixation without opening joint capsule in trial group, and 34 cases underwent traditional surgery method in control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to admission, side of injury, and types of fracture between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision heal ing, and fracture healing were compared between 2 groups. The tibial-femoral angle and collapse of joint surface were measured on X-ray film. At last follow-up, joint function was evaluated with Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee function scale. ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss in trial group was significantly less than that in control group (P<0.05). The incision length in trial group was significantly shorter than that in control group (P<0.05). Difference was not significant in operation time and the rate of incision heal ing between 2 groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 20.4 months) in trial group and 12-31 months (mean, 18.2 months) in control group. X-ray films indicated that all cases in 2 groups obtained fracture heal ing; there was no significant difference in the fracture healing time between 2 groups (t=1.382, P=0.173). On X-ray films, difference was not significant in tibial-femoral angle and collapse of joint surface between 2 groups (P>0.05). HSS score of the knee in trial group was significantly higher than that of control group (t=3.161, P=0.003). ConclusionIt can reduce the intraoperative blood loss and shorten the incision length to use open reduction and internal fixation without opening joint capsule for tibial plateau fracture. Traction of joint capsule is helpful in the reduction and good recovery of joint surface collapse. In addition, the surgery without opening joint capsule can avoid joint stiffness and obtain better joint function.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of a new anterolateral approach of distal femur in the treatment of type C distal femoral fractures by comparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches. MethodsThe clinical data of 51 patients with type C distal femoral fractures treated between January 2008 and August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 51 patients, 24 patients received the new anterolateral approach of distal femur combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (modified group), and 27 patients underwent traditional lateral or anterolateral approach combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification, side, fracture type, complication, and the time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores of the knee at 3, 6, and 12 months were recorded. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed and the incision healed by first intention in all patients. The operation time and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy of modified group were significantly less than those of traditional group (P<0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization time showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-37 months (mean, 21.3 months). X-ray films showed all fractures were union. The fracture healing time was (12.92±2.24) weeks in the modified group and (13.24±2.52) weeks in the traditional group, showing no significant difference (t=0.476, P=0.637). The knee HSS scores of modified group were significantly higher than those of traditional group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of knee varus or valgus, leg length discrepancy, internal fixator loosening, flexing dysfunction of knee, traumatic arthritis of knee, and total complications between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches, using the new anterolateral approach to treat type C distal femoral fractures has the advantages of less damage to soft tissue, excellent exposure, less operation time, and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and better postoperative rehabilitation of knee joint.
ObjectiveTo investigate the methods and effectiveness of one-stage operation for pelvis and acetabular fractures combined with Morel-Lavallée injury by internal fixation associated with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD). MethodsBetween June 2008 and October 2012, 15 cases of pelvis and acetabular fractures combined with Morel-Lavallée injury were treated. There were 5 males and 10 females, aged from 18 to 67 years (mean, 36.8 years). Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 11 cases and crashing injury of heavy object in 4 cases. The time from injury to hospitalization was 3 hours to 9 days (mean, 5.4 days). Morel-Lavallée injury located in the above posterior superior iliac spine in 4 cases, greater trochanter in 7 cases, and anterior proximal thigh in 4 cases. In 10 cases complicated by pelvic fracture, there were 1 case of anteroposterior compression type, 3 cases of lateral compression type, 5 cases of vertical shear type, and 1 case of compound injury type; in 5 cases complicated by acetabular fracture, there were 1 case of transverse fracture, 1 case of posterior wall and posterior column fracture, 1 case of transverse acetabulum plus posterior wall fracture, and 2 cases of both columns fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation were used to treat pelvic and acetabular fractures, and VSD to treat Morel-Lavallée injury. When the drainage volume was less than 20 mL/d, interrupted wound suture or free skin grafting was performed. ResultsThe hospitalization time was 16-31 days (mean, 20.8 days). Thirteen cases were followed up 4-16 months (mean, 7.8 months). The healing time of Morel-Lavallée injury was 16-36 days after operation (mean, 21.3 days). All the wounds had primary healing, and no infection occurred. The X-ray films showed that all fractures healed, with a mean healing time of 13.6 weeks (range, 11-18 weeks). At 6.5 months after operation, according to Majeed function scoring system in 8 cases of pelvic fracture, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case; according to Harris hip scoring in 4 cases of acetabular fracture, the results were excellent in 2 cases, good in 1 case, and fair in 1 case. ConclusionTo pelvis-acetabular fractures combined with Morel-Lavallée injury, internal fixation treatment for fracture and VSD for Morel-Lavallée injury not only can cure merge Morel-Lavallée injury effectively, but also can guarantee the operation timing and incision safty of the pelvis-acetabular fractures.
目的:总结空心螺钉、DHS或人工关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折的适应证及效果。方法:分别用空心螺钉、DHS固定和人工关节置换3种方法治疗获得随访的中老年股骨颈骨折29例。年龄51～85岁,平均68.3岁。空心螺钉组8例,DHS组15例,人工关节组6例。结果:随访29例,随访时间1～3年,平均2~3年。围手术期无1例死亡,无切口感染,无内固定断裂,无关节脱位。发生退钉2例,股骨头坏死1例。功能评定:优20例,良6例,差3例。结论:根据患者的年龄、经济状况、骨折部位、骨折分型合理地选择治疗方法,是减少并发症,提高治疗效果和老年人生活质量的关键。
目的:探讨股骨近端解剖钢板在治疗股骨反转子间骨折的疗效和临床价值。方法:系统回顾2005年5月至2009年9月21例股骨反转子间骨折患者,其中男性18例,女性3例,年龄36～67岁,平均52岁,AO/OTA分型:A3.1型12例,A3.2型3例,A3.3型6例,应用股骨近端解剖钢板行内固定治疗。结果:21例患者全部随访,随访时间6～18个月,平均13个月,骨折全部愈合、髋关节功能按Zncherman提出的髋部骨折专用评分标准评估,优17例,良2例,差1例,优良率90.4%,术后无钢板、螺钉断裂。结论:股骨近端解剖钢板是治疗股骨反转子间骨折的有效方法。