OBJECTIVE: To report the effect of Russe technique in treating old scaphoid fracture. METHODS: From January 1987 to February 1999, 11 cases of old scaphoid fractures were treated with Russe technique. The follow-up period averaged 5 years and 7 months. RESULTS: The fracture healing rate was 100%, and wrist pain was completely relieved in all cases. The ranges of motion averaged 41.2 degrees of flexion, 40.5 degrees of extension, 8.7 degrees of radial deviation, and 15.4 degrees of ulnar deviation. The grip strength reached 82.9% of the normal side. CONCLUSION: Russe technique is an effective and safe method of treatment for old scaphoid fracture.
OBJECTIVE To summarize the clinical results of hollow compression screw in treatment of fracture of neck of femur in the aged. METHODS: From November 1993 to October, 1998, 52 aged patients with several types of fracture of neck of femur were treated; among them, there were 25 males and 27 females aged from 60 to 83 years (70 years on average). There were 48 cases of fresh fracture and 4 cases of old fracture. Forty-two cases were performed closed reduction internal fixation, 10 cases with open reduction internal fixation. RESULTS: All the patients could sit by themselves 4 to 6 days after operation, and could walk with a crutch 10 to 15 days after operation. The mobility of hip joint was nearly normal 4 weeks after operation. All the patients were followed 26 to 84 months, 48.5 months on average. Bone union was achieved in 50 cases, nonunion in 2 cases. The average healing time was 4.7 months. There were no other complications, such as ankylosis and muscular atrophy, but ischemic necrosis in 3 cases. CONCLUSION: This method has following advantages, convenient manipulation, less injury, stable fixation, and the short-term recovery, which avoid some common complications. It is a reliable method worthy of popularizing.
目的 探讨经伤椎椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。 方法 2008年5月－2010年12月，选择38例胸腰椎骨折患者，采用椎弓根螺钉固定伤椎及相邻上下椎体。其中男28例，女10例；年龄21～65岁，平均36.5岁。骨折部位：胸8 1例，胸9 2例，胸10 4例，胸11 8例，胸12 7例，腰1 10例，腰2 4例，腰3 2例。受伤至手术时间3～7 d，平均4.5 d。对患者手术前后椎体高度、矢状面后凸Cobb角、神经功能Frankel分级变化等指标进行测量并随访。 结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。38例获随访12～18个月，平均15个月。骨折均获得骨性融合，无钉棒断裂、无死亡或神经损伤加重患者。术后神经功能Frankel分级较术前有明显改善（P＜0.05）。术后X线片复查示伤椎高度恢复达90%以上，外形正常；CT复查示椎管内有效矢状径恢复满意，椎管前方无明显骨性压迫，伤椎椎体骨愈合良好。术后1、12个月时伤椎前、后缘高度及后凸Cobb角均较术前显著改善（P＜0.05）；术后12个月随访椎体高度无丢失。 结论 经伤椎椎弓根钉复位、减压、内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折具有创伤小、固定节段少、脊柱稳定性好、能有效矫正及预防脊柱后凸畸形等优点。
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of modified tarsal sinus approach and traditional tarsal sinus approach in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures.MethodsBetween January 2015 and August 2017, 53 patients with Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures were selected and divided into observation group (21 cases, using modified tarsal sinus approach for fracture reduction after exposure of the subtalar joint below the long and short fibular tendon) and control group (32 cases, using traditional tarsal sinus approach) by random number method. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, side, cause of injury, fracture type, injury to operation time, and preoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) core (P>0.05), which were comparable. The operation time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and postoperative angle improvement values of the two groups were recorded and compared. VAS score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsAll the 53 patients successfully completed the operation without serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury and perioperative death. There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative drainage volume between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 17 months). No infection, fracture displacement, failure of internal fixation, and malunion of fracture occurred after operation. None of the patients underwent secondary joint fusion. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=0.30, P=0.77). The postoperative Böhler angle and Gissane angle at 2 days in the two groups were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and improvement value between the observation group and the control group at 2 days after operation (P>0.05). VAS scores at 24 hours and 1 year after operation were significantly improved when compared with that before operation in both groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at 24 hours and 1 year after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups at 1 year after operation (t=1.46, P=0.15). However, the SF-36 scale score at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=2.08, P=0.04). At last follow-up, 2 patients in the observation group and 8 patients in the control group presented subtalar joint stiffness or pain, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the two groups (χ2=1.98, P=0.16).ConclusionThe modified tarsal sinus approach for the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures has the advantages of minimal invasion, clear reduction under direct vision, reliable reduction and fixation, and low incision complications.