Objective To summarize the occurrence mechanism of backside wear, the method of evaluating backside surface damage, the relationship between backside wear and osteolysis in acetabulum, and the approach to reduce backside wear in total hip arthroplasty with modular acetabulum prosthesis. Methods The recent articles about the backside wear in acetabular liners were extensively reviewed. Results Backside wear in acetabular liners is connected with micromotion between the liner and the shell, rough interface, thickness of the liner, and impingement. The methods to evaluate backside wear damage are only proceeded in revised acetabular liners. Backside wear can generate polyethylene particles that is likely related to the process of osteolysis in acetabulum through the screw holes of metallic shell. To reduce backside wear between the liner and the shell, measures such as improved locking mechanisms, smooth inner metallic shell, maximized shell liner conformity, improving the quality of polyethylene, and reducing impingement can be taken. Conclusion There is no method of evaluating the backside wear in vivo. The relationship between backside wear and osteolysis in acetabulum as well as aseptic loosening of acetabulum prosthesis is controversial.
Objective To explore the expressions of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and runt-related transcription facotr 2 (Runx2) and microarchitecture of trabecular bone periacetabula in adult patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods Between March and September 2008, the trabecular bone periacetabulum was collected from 8 patients with DDH who were scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (aged 37-55 years, 3 males and 5 females, trial group) and from 8 patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Ficat stage II) who were scheduled for hip resurfacing arthroplasty (aged 36-55 years, 3 males and 5 females, control group). The expressions of BMP-2 and Runx2 in the trabecular bone were determined by real-time quantitative PCR, and the microarchitecture was observed by micro-CT and the following parameters were determined: bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), connectivity density (Conn.Dens), trabecular number (Tb. N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), and structure model index (SMI). Results The expressions of BMP-2 and Runx2 were significantly lower in trial group than in control group (P lt; 0.05). The micro-CT showed sparse trabecular bone in trial group and dense trabecular bone in control group. BV/TV and Tb.N in trial group were significantly lower than those in control group, and SMI and Tb.Sp in trial group were significantly higher than those in control group (P lt; 0.05); there was no significant difference in Conn.Dens and Tb.Th between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The trabecular bone is in a low metabolism condition and its microarchitecture is tendency to be osteoporosis trabecualr bone in adult patients with DDH. It may be related with the acetabular component loosening after total hip arthroplasty.
Objective To analyze the main reasons of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to disscuss the prevention and management. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed from 19 patients undergoing revision for acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA between January 2003 and June 2010. There were 11 males and 8 females, aged from 55 to 79 years (mean, 67.2 years). The locations were lefthip in 9 cases and right hip in 10 cases. The cementless hip prosthesis was used in 12 cases and cement hip rosthesis in 7 cases. The revisions were performed at 3 weeks to 6 months after primary THA. The reasons of early failure were analyzed. Both the coverage rate of acetabulum-bone and the Harris hip score were compared between pre- and post-revision. Results The main reason of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA may be unsuitable treatment of acetabulum, improper selection of acetabular component, and incorrect place angle of acetabular component. Sciatic nerve palsy occurred in 1 case and recovered at 7 weeks after revision. Sl ight fracture of the acetabulum in 1 case and healed at 3 months after revision. All incisions healed by first intention. No infection, vessel injury, displacement of acetabular component, or deep vein thrombosis occurred. The patients were followed up 11-73 months (mean, 28 months). At last follow-up, no acetabular component instabil ity was observed. The coverage rate of acetabulum-bone was increased from 67.9% ± 5.5% before revision to 87.7% ± 5.2% after revision, showing significant difference (t=11.592，P=0.003). The Harris hip score at last follow-up (84.4 ± 4.6) was significantly higher than that at pre-revision (56.5 ± 9.3) (t=11.380，P=0.005). Conclusion Detailed surgical plan, proper choice of component, correct place angle and elaborative planning, and proficient surgical skill are necessary to achieve the initial stability of acetabular component in THA．
Objective To improve the accuracy of the acetabular component placement using the nonimage based surgical navigation system. Methods Twenty-three patients (14 males, 9 females; age, 28-55 years;26 hips）with hip disease underwent the total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the nonimage based surgicalnavigation system from February 2004 to April 2006. Rheumatoid arthritis was found in 3 patients (3 hips), necrosis of the femoral head in 6 patients (6 hips), and osteoarthritis in 14 patients (16 hips). All the patients were randomly divided into the following 2 groups: the navigated group (11 patients, 13 hips), treated by THA using the nonimage based surgical navigation system; and the control group (12 patients, 13 hips), treated by the traditional THA. According to thedesign of the study, the acetabular component was placed in the best inclination angle (45°) and the anteversion angle (15°). The postoperative component position was examined. Results No fracture, dislocation, infection or injury to the sciatic nerve was found. In the navigated group, the inclination and the anteversion reached 15.4±1.4° and 45.5±1.3°, respectively. In the control group,the inclination and the anteversion were 13.9±7.6° and 43.7±6.4°, respectively. The inclination difference was considered statistically significant (Plt;0.01). All the patients were followed up for 10-40 months,averaged 26 months. In the navigated group, the postoperative average Harris hip score was 95 (range,85-110), with an excellent result in 11 hips and a good result in 2 hips. In the control group, the postoperative average Harris hip score was 92 (range,75-110), with an excellent result in 9 hips, a good result in 3 hips, and a fair result in 1 hip. The Harris hip score difference was considered statistically significant (Plt;0.05). There was a significantly better result obtained in the navigated group than in the control group. Conclusion The acetabular component can be implanted accurately by the nonimage based surgical navigation system, which can reduce the incidence of the loosening of the prostheses and has an important value in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of using smartphone to measure the angle of acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsBetween June 2012 and September 2015, the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles were measured in 50 patients undergoing THA. There were 24 males and 26 females, aged 37 to 83 years (mean, 71 years). The left hip was involved in 22 cases and the right hip in 28 cases. Of 50 patients, 34 suffered from fracture of the femoral neck, and 16 suffered from avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Acetabular dysplasia was excluded in all cases. A smartphone was used to measure the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles during operation; standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) was used to measured the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles on the X-ray film at 1 week after operation. It was defined as positive that the component angle values by PACS measurement were greater than those by the smartphone measurement, whereas as negative. The two measurement methods were compared, and intra-observer variability was assessed by analyzing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze difference. ResultsThe ICC was 0.84 in the acetabular component angles by smartphone and PACS measurement methods. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.02±1.33)° and the anteversion angle was (17.62±2.20)° by smartphone measurement. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.74±4.05)° and the anteversion angle was (17.22±5.57)° by PACS measurement. There was no significant difference between two measurement methods (Z=-1.977, P=0.482; Z=-0.368, P=0.713). The acetabular component angle was in the safe zone in 44 cases; and the acetabular component anteversion angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 5°, and the abduction angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 3° in 6 cases. Intra-measurement variability was -21 to +10° for the anteversion angle and -10 to + 9° for the abduction angle, indicating that the acetabular component anteversion angle by smartphone measurement was greater than that by the PACS measurement, and the abduction angle was less than that by PACS measurement. ConclusionSmartphone is a convenient tool to measure the acetabular component angle in THA.
Objective To observe the tendency of serum cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), and molybdenum (Mo) ions concentration level after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip (RSAH) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), and analyze the influence factors. Methods Forty-seven patients (55 hips) underwent RSAH between June 2005 and November 2014 who had good joint function (Harris score were >85) at every review time were selected in the study. There were 25 males and 22 females, with the mean age of 49.7 years (range, 18-64 years). The disease causes included developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in 18 cases (22 hips) and non-DDH in 29 cases (33 hips). The follow-up time was 6 months to 5 years (mean, 3.2 years). The concentrations of Co, Cr, and Mo ions were measured by ICP-MS, and were compared with those of 6 normal controls. Based on the analysis of the measured results, patients were chosen and grouped according to prosthesis position and femoral head prosthesis diameter. A correlative analysis was made between serum metal ions concentration and various factors (age, body mass index, pre- and post-operative Harris scores, neck-shaft angle, and stem-shaft angle). Results The concentration of serum Co ion reached the peak at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), and then slowly decreased, increased again at 4 years after operation and was close to the 2nd-year level at 5 years. The concentration of serum Cr ion reached its peak at 9 months after operation (P<0.05), and then gradually decreased, and was close to normal level at 5 years. The concentration of serum Mo ion kept increase trend and reached the peak at 5 years (P<0.05). Thirty-five hips of 29 patients followed up 9 months and 1 year were grouped. For DDH and non-DDH patients, Co and Cr ion concentrations of 40-45° abduction angle of acetabular component were significantly lower than those of <40 and="">45° (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Mo ion concentration (P>0.05). For all patients, Co, Cr, and Mo ion concentrations of 15-20° anteversion angle of acetabular component were significantly lower than those of <15 and="">20° (P<0.05). Co, Cr, and Mo ion concentrations of ≥48 mm diameter of the femoral component were significantly lower than those of <48 mm (P<0.05). There was a negative correlation between Co ion and postoperative Harris score (r=–0.486,P=0.041). Conclusion The serum Co and Cr ions concentrations increase obviously at 1 year and 9 months after RSAH operation, and Mo ion concentration displays an increase trend. The metal ions concentrations have close relationship with the position of acetabular component.
Objective To investigate the accuracy and effectiveness of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) after lumbar fusion applying of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system. Methods A clinical data of 45 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis between January 2018 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients had previously received lumbar fusion. The modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angle test system was used in 26 cases (observation group) and not used in 19 cases (control group) during THA. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, operative side, number of lumbar fusion segments, and preoperative Harris score between the two groups (P>0.05). The position of acetabular prosthesis, hip function (Harris score), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results In the observation group, all acetabular cups were in the safe zone (anteversion angle, 25°-30°) during operation, and 1 acetabular cup (3.85%) was not in the safe zone after operation. In the control group, 9 acetabular cups (47.37%) were not in the safe zone. The postoperative difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between intra- and post-operative acetabular inclination angles in the observation group (P>0.05), and the postoperative acetabular inclination angle was significantly smaller in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6 months. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at different time point (P>0.05), and there were significant differences between different time points in the two groups (P<0.05). No joint dislocation occurred in the observation group during follow-up, while dislocation occurred in 2 cases and femoral impingement syndrome occurred in 1 case of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For THA patients with lumbar fusion, the ideal placement angle of the acetabular cup can be obtained by using the modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system during operation.