ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress on the application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in traumatic orthopedic surgery in recent years.MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature in recent years was reviewed, and the efficacy and safety of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries with different regimen, dose and route of administration were comprehensively summarized and compared.ResultsThe application of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries increased gradually in recent years. Intravenous or topical administration of TXA efficaciously reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements during hip fracture surgery without significantly increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. However, the efficacy was not clear in other traumatic orthopedic surgeries such as pelvic and acetabular fractures.ConclusionMore studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical features of elderly hip fracture in Leshan area in China. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with hip fractures from June 2006 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Gender, age, fracture type, injury causes, activities before injury and treatment were analyzed. ResultsThe mean age of patients with a hip fracture was 76.5 years. The overall male to female ratio with hip fracture was 1:1.44. There were 154 patients (50.0%) with femoral neck fracture, 138 patients (44.8%) with intertrochanteric fracture, and 16 patients (5.2%) with subrtrochanteric fracture. A total of 248 patients (77.3%) were poorly educated, and 210 patients (68.2%) had basic medical insurance. The mean time between being injured and hospitalized after injury was 3 days. There were 257 patients (83.4%) with fall damage. ConclusionFemale patients with hip fracture are more than male patients. Fall damage is the main injure type. The features of elderly hip fracture in Leshan include retardation to consult a doctor, poor education of the patients, dependence primarily on basic medical insurance and under-emphasis of anti-osteoporosis therapy.
Objective To construct an intervention program for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture based on cognitive behavioral theory. Methods Based on cognitive behavioral theory and literature review, an initial draft of intervention plan for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture was constructed. From January to March 2025, after two rounds of expert consultations and revisions, the final plan was formed. Results A total of 16 experts across the country were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, covering areas such as orthopedic clinical nursing, orthopedic clinical medicine, nursing education, nursing management, rehabilitation therapy, and psychological therapy. The active participation rates for the two rounds of consultations were 94.12% and 100.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.860 and 0.907, respectively, and the Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.369 and 0.524, respectively. Ultimately, a program composed of 5 primary indicators (fall fear management team, fall fear management goals, fall fear assessment, fall fear intervention measures, and post-intervention effect evaluation), 17 secondary indicators, and 31 tertiary indicators was constructed. Conclusion The intervention program for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture based on cognitive behavior theory constructed in this study is scientific and operable, which can provide reference and guidance for clinical nursing staff.
Objective To explore the correlation between multimorbidity and hip fractures in middle-aged and elderly populations. Methods The population without hip fractures in 2011 was selected in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database. According to whether the research subjects experienced hip fractures between 2015 and 2020, they were divided into the hip fracture group and the non-hip fracture group. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the correlation between multimorbidity and hip fracture occurrence. Results A total of 9644 subjects were included. Among them, there were 4406 males and 5238 females. There were 419 cases in the hip fracture group and 9225 cases in the non-hip fracture group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes, heart disease, arthritis and hearing impairment were independent risk factors for hip fracture. Compared to those without chronic diseases, individuals with ≥3 types of comorbidities among the 4 chronic diseases had a higher risk of hip fracture. Conclusions In the middle-aged and elderly population, diabetes, heart disease, arthritis and hearing impairment are chronic diseases associated with hip fracture. The higher the number of comorbidities of chronic diseases, the higher the risk of new hip fractures.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of multidisciplinary team (MDT) co-management models in the clinical treatment of geriatric hip fractures.MethodsThe literature about types and characteristics of MDT for geriatric hip fracture treatment were extensively reviewed, and the advantages of its clinical application were analysed and summarised. Finally, the MDT model and characteristics of geriatric hip fracture in the Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University were introduced in detail.ResultsClinical models of MDT are diverse and have their own characteristics, and MDT can shorten the length of stay and waiting time before operation, reduce the incidence of internal complications, save labor costs, and reduce patient mortality.ConclusionThe application of MDT in the treatment of geriatric hip fracture has achieved remarkable results, which provides an optimal scheme for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture.
ObjectiveTo introduce the clinical pathway for geriatric hip fracture regulated by our hospital and report the five-year outcomes after the implementation of the pathway. MethodsThe geriatric hip fracture patients treated between September 2003 and August 2012 were followed up. We did not implement the clinical pathway until January 2007. Statistical analysis was done to evaluate the effect of the clinical pathway on patient outcomes by comparing rate of complication, mortality, and length of hospital stay before and after the implementation of the clinical pathway. ResultsAfter the implementation of the pathway, the in-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and the rate of complication were significantly lower. Besides, the time from admission to operation and the total length of stay in hospital were obviously shortened. ConclusionThe use of clinical pathway for geriatric hip fracture can reduce the rate of complication and mortality, and shorten hospital stay, and the five-year outcomes after the implementation of the pathway are satisfying.
Objective To review the progress of perioperative treatments for patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures. Methods The related literature of treatments for patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures were reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as the perioperative management, selection of operation ways, and prognosis. Results The patients of Parkinson’s disease are more likely to sustain hip fractures because of postural instability and osteoporosis. The perioperative treatments for patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures should be determined by orthopedists, neurologist, anesthesiologist, and physical therapist. There is still controversy about the selection of operation and surgical approach. And the prognosis of patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures are associated with the severity of Parkinson’s disease. Conclusion There are few clinical studies about the patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures. The mid-term and long-term functional outcomes of patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures are unsufficient. And the best treatments of patients of Parkinson’s disease and hip fractures need to be further explored.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgery rates, time from hospitalization to operation, length of stay, and the incidences of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.703, P=0.002). The time from hospitalization to operation and length of stay in observation group [(5.39±2.47), (10.56±3.76) days] were significant shorter than those in control group [(6.13±2.79), (12.27±3.11) days] (t=−3.075, P=0.002; t=−5.330, P=0.000). The incidence of respiratory complications was 46.15% in control group and 30.56% in observation group; the incidence of cardiovascular system complications was 69.23% in control group and 51.19% in observation group; the incidence of cerebrovascular system complications was 20.12% in control group and 11.11% in observation group; the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 40.24% in control group and 25.40% in observation group. The incidences of perioperative complications were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.
Objective To review the research progress of rapid surgery for hip fracture in elderly patients. Methods The published studies, expert consensus, and guidelines at home and abroad were systematically summarized from the aspects of the characteristics of aging population, the benefits of rapid surgery, the disadvantages of delayed surgery, and the recommendations of current guidelines, so as to further guide clinical practice. Results Hip fracture is a common fracture type in the elderly population. As elderly patients generally have poor physique and often have a variety of underlying diseases, such as hypostatic pneumonia, bedsore, lower limb vein thrombosis, and other complications in conservative treatment, its disability rate and mortality are high, so surgical treatment is the first choice. At present, most relevant studies and expert consensus and guidelines at home and abroad support rapid surgery, that is, preoperative examination should be started immediately after admission, and adverse factors such as taking anticoagulant drugs, serious cardiovascular diseases, and severe anemia should be clearly and actively corrected, and surgery should be completed within 48 hours after admission as far as possible. Rapid surgery can not only significantly reduce the mortality of patients, but also reduce the length of hospital stay and the incidence of perioperative cognitive impairment, which is conducive to the recovery of patients with pain during hospitalization and postoperative function, and improve the prognosis of patients. Conclusion In order to avoid many problems caused by delayed surgery, the elderly patients with hip fracture should be operated as soon as possible under the condition of actively correcting the adverse factors. Comprehensive evaluation and preparation, the development of an individualized surgical plan, and the formation of a multidisciplinary medical team can reduce surgical risks and improve effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between H2RA and the risk of hip fracture by performing a meta-analysis. MethodsWe searched CNKI, PubMed and EMbase from inception to September 19th 2016, to collect case-control studies or cohort studies reporting the risk of hip fracture with H2RA. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using Stata 13 software. ResultsEleven studies involving 206 276 hip fracture cases were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that patients receiving H2RA therapy had approximately 1.12 times the risk of developing hip fracture compared with nonusers (OR=1.12 95%CI 1.02 to 1.24, P=0.022). Subgroup analyses by interval time indicated that the risk appeared greater with the continuous users (OR=1.11, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.24, P=0.039) whereas the discontinuous users was not significantly associated with hip fracture risk. ConclusionH2RA therapy may be associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. For patients with intermittent medication, the side effect may disappear by discontinuation of PPI use for at least 30 days, but the study did not find time-effect relationship or dose-effect relationship. Considering the limitations of this study, more rigorous clinical trials evaluating the potential side-effect of H2RA are needed.