目的 探讨保留括约肌虚挂线法治疗高位肛周脓肿的临床疗效。 方法 2009年10月－2010年10月采用随机对照试验，对52例高位肛周脓肿患者施行手术治疗，其中保留括约肌虚挂线法（治疗组）26例，切开挂线引流法（对照组）26例。对两组患者术后6个月肛瘘发生率、切口愈合时间、术后1～15 d每晚疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和术后6个月痊愈患者肛门功能后遗症发生率进行比较。 结果 术后6个月，治疗组和对照组肛瘘发生率分别为4.0%和3.8%，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后7～15 d治疗组VAS评分均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组切口愈合时间分别为（19.05 ± 6.71）d和（21.42 ± 8.40）d，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后6个月治疗组痊愈患者肛门功能全部正常，对照组后遗症发生率为12.0%，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 保留括约肌虚挂线治疗在术后疼痛、切口愈合时间和保护肛门功能等方面明显优于切开挂线引流治疗，是一种治疗高位肛周脓肿较为理想的方法。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology in the treatment of high perianal abscess. Methods A total of 38 cases of high perianal abscess who underwent surgery in our hospital from May. 2014 to Feb. 2016 were randomly divided into 2 groups: the VSD group (n=19) and the control group (n=19). The cases of VSD group were performed with closure of internal orifice+VSD technique, and the cases of control group were treated with radical operation of perianal abscess (low incision combined with high thread operation). The following indexes of cases in 2 groups were compared and analyzed, including postoperative pain score, wound healing time, postoperative anal function score, and prognosis. Results There were significant differences in pain score (3.53±0.70vs. 5.11±0.74), postoperative anal function score (0vs. 1), and wound healing time〔(27.58±4.95) dvs. (44.68±6.53) d〕between VSD group and control group,P<0.05. Compared with the control group, the pain score and anal function score of the VSD group were both lower, and the wound healing time was shorter. However, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of fistula between the two groups〔5.3% (1/19)vs. 15.8% (3/19),P=0.60〕. Conclusion In the treatment of high perianal abscess, VSD technology can relieve pain in patients, shorten the wound healing time, protect the anal function, and the prognosis is as well as low incision combined with high thread operation, so VSD is a better treatment method for high perianal abscess.