目的:比较不同麻醉方法在腹腔镜妇科不孕检查及治疗术中的效果和安全性。方法:选择不孕拟在腹腔镜下行检查及治疗术的患者60例,随机分为三组,每组20人,分别进行连续硬膜外麻醉(简称EA组);静吸复合全身麻醉(简称GA组);连续硬膜外麻醉加静吸复合全身麻醉(简称EGA组),观察比较三种麻醉方法对患者呼吸,循环及麻醉效果的影响。结果:三种麻醉方法均可保证手术完成,EA组术中管理较为麻烦,GA组循环波动大,EGA组麻醉效果更好,各种药物用量减少,患者血液动力学更稳定,恢复快,管理更轻松。结论:连续硬膜外麻醉加静吸复合全身麻醉(EGA)可避免其它两种麻醉方式不足,各取长处,更适用于腹腔镜妇科不孕检查及治疗术麻醉。
Objective To explore anesthetic quality of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer. Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer and received operation in the Central Hospital of Bazhong City from June 2010 to June 2012 were included retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia， and the patients who received general anesthesia only were defined as group A， the patients who received epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia were defined as group B. The anesthetic quality and anesthetic adverse reaction were observed in two groups. Results The differences of baseline characteristics in two groups were not significant （P＞0.05）. The difference of anesthetic quality in two groups was not significant （P＞0.05）. In terms of anesthetic adverse reaction， the incidence rate of hypertension， hypotension，tachycardia， or postoperative nausea and vomiting of the group B was significantly lower than those of the group A （P＜0.05）. The incidence rate of bradycardia， premature ventricular contractions， or time of gastrointestinal function recovery had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. There was no nerve dysfunction of lower limb in two groups. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer as compared with general anesthesia only not only has the same anesthetic quality， but also has obvious advantages in decreasing anesthetic adverse reaction.