Objective To observe the long-term efficacy and safety of macular buckling (MB) in the treatment of high myopia traction maculopathy. MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From January 2014 to December 2017, 57 eyes of 57 patients with high myopia traction maculopathy who underwent MB treatment at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University were included in the study. Among them, there were 15 males with 15 eyes, average age was 51.80±10.72 years; there were 42 females with 42 eyes, average age was 59.14±11.51 years. There were 21 eyes of 21 cases with highly myopic macular hole with macular detachment (MHMD), and 36 eyes in 36 cases with highly myopic foveoschisis with macular detachment (FSMD), and they were grouped accordingly. All patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and axial length (AL) measurements. The standard logarithmic visual acuity chart was used for BCVA examination, which was converted into logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity during statistics. All patients underwent MB, either on its own or combined with vitrectomy. Patients with significant vitreous macular traction on OCT were treated with combined surgery. One, 3, 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after the operation, the same equipment and methods before the operation were used to conduct related examinations, and the long-term efficacy and safety of the two groups of eyes were observed. ResultsBefore surgery, the logMAR BCVA of eyes in MHMD group and FSMD group were 1.35±0.47 and 1.17±0.59, respectively; 4 years after surgery, they were 1.02±0.49 and 0.73±0.55, respectively. The BCVA improved significantly at postoperative 4 years than preoperative in both groups (P=0.039, 0.001). In the eyes with MHMD, the BCVA was found to be significant improved 3 years after surgery (P=0.042). Whereas, in the eyes with FSMD, the BCVA was found to be significantly improved 3 months after surgery (P=0.013). Macular reattachment was achieved in 100% of cases, while macular hole closure rate was achieved in 66.7% in the MHMD group. In the FSMD group, either macular reattachment rate or the foveoschisis resolution rate was 97.2%. After surgery, choroidal neovascularization was observed in 2 eyes, and 3 eyes with intraretinal cyst. ConclusionMB may represent a safe and effective surgical option for the treatment of high myopia maculopathy.
The classical surgical operations for foveoschisis in high myopia are vitrectomy, artificial posterior vitreous detachment, removal of the pre-macular vitreous cortex, removal of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) and intraocular gas tamponade, with some minor variations on those basis, including no removal of the ILM or ILM peeling with preservation of the fovea area; with or without gas filling, long-term silicone oil tamponade, etc. All the procedures have achieved certain efficacy and the foveoschis can be fully or partially relieved and the visual acuity can be improved to different degrees. It is worthwhile to emphasize, the most common and serious complication of the surgery is the occurrence of full-thickness macular hole or even postoperative macular hole retinal detachment. To address the risk of such complications, a safe and effective outcome can be achieved in the majority of cases by using ILM peeling with preservation of the fovea area. For high-risk cases where the operator is concerned about intraoperative or postoperative macular hole, a long-term silicone oil tamponade without ILM removal is proposed to prevent the risk of surgery-related macular hole formation.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined total peeling of internal limiting membrane (ILM) versus fovea-sparing peeling of ILM for myopic foveoschisis. MethodsA evidence-based medicine study. Chinese and English as search terms for myopic foveoschisis, vitrectomy, and peeling of internal limiting membrane were used to search literature in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, VIP database, PubMed of National Library of Medicine, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The high myopic macular schisis was selected as the research object, the intervention method was PPV combined with complete ILM peeling and combined with foveal preservation ILM peeling surgery clinical control study between Jan 1, 2010, and Jun 31, 2021. Incomplete or irrelevant literature and review literature were excluded. The method of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale system was used to evaluate the included literature. The literature was meta-analyzed by RevMan5.3 software. The mean difference (MD) and a confidence interval (CI) of 95% were used to describe the effect sizes of continuous data, fixed effects model was performed. The data including the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central fovea thickness (CFT), and postoperative macular hole (MH) were analyzed. ResultsIn those databases, 232 articles based search stratery were totally retrieved, and 10 articles (417 eyes) were finally included for meta-analysis with 245 eyes for PPV combined total peeling of ILM and 172 eyes for PPV combined fovea-sparing peeling of ILM. Meta-analysis results showed there was no significant difference in BCVA and CFT between the two groups (BCVA: MD=0.05, 95%CI 0.00-0.11; P＞0.05; CFT: MD=－4.79, 95%CI －18.69-9.11, P＞0.05). It was compared with the incidence of MH, the difference was statistically significant (odds ratio=5.70, 95%CI 2.22-14.61, P＜0.05). ConclusionBCVA and CFT could be improved by PPV combined total and fovea-sparing peeling of ILM for myopic foveoschisis; compared with complete ILM peeling, the incidence of MH was lower after foveal-sparing ILM peeling.
Objective To observe the clinical effects of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and C3F8 tamponade for patients with highly myopic macular hole (HM-MH) with and without foveoschisis. MethodsA retrospective case controlled study. From January 2017 to February 2022, 23 eyes of 23 patients with highly myopic macular hole with and without foveoschisis diagnosed in the Shandong Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among them, 5 males had 5 eyes, and 18 females had 18 eyes, the age was (54.43±12.96) years old. The patients with or without foveoschisis were 12 eyes in 12 cases and 11 eyes in 11 cases. Studies were divided into two groups, depending on the presence of a concomitant myopic foveoschisis or not. The groups are high myopia macular hole with foveoschisis (group A) and high myopia macular hole without foveoschisis (group B). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), B-scan ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography and axial length (AL) measurement were performed in all eyes. Snellen chart was used for BCVA examination, and the visual acuity was converted into logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) during statistics. The age of the two groups, sex, macular hole (MH) diameter, logMAR BCVA, AL, posterior scleral staphyloma, there was no significant difference (P＞0.05). PPV combined with ILM peeling and C3F8 filling were performed in all eyes. Follow-up was at least 3 months after the last operation. BCVA changes and MH closure were compared between the two groups after surgery. Wilcoxon test was used to compare BCVA before and after operation. Mann-whiteny U test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative BCVA between groups. ResultsAfter initial surgery, MH was closed in 17 of 23 eyes (74%, 17/23). MH was closed in 8 eyes in group A (66.7%, 8/12). Four eyes were not closed (33.3%, 4/12); MH closed in 9 eyes in group B (81.8%, 9/11). There was no significant difference between the two groups after initial operation (P＞0.05). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, the logMAR BCVA of patients in group A and group B were 1.00±0.46, 1.03±0.83 and 0.53±0.63, 0.55±0.41, respectively. Compared with before operation, there was no significant difference at 1 month (P=0.783, 0.358), but the difference was statistically significant at 3 months (P=0.012, 0.007). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between group A and group B at 1 and 3 months after operation (P=0.687, 0.950). ConclusionPPV combined with ILM peeling and C3F8 tamponade can promote MH closure and improve visual acuity in most affected eyes with HM-MH with and without foveoschisis.