ObjectiveTo investigate the necessity of subcutaneous suture for gynecologic abdominal incision, and to prove the clinical value of suture without subcutaneous ligature. MethodsWe retrospectively studied the clinical data of 210 cases of gynecologic abdominal incision treated between May 2010 and May 2013. A total of 111 cases had the suture without subcutaneous ligature and 99 received the traditional suture. ResultsOne patient (0.90%) had fat liquefaction in the group of suture without subcutaneous ligature, while 7 (7.07%) of fat liquefaction were found in the traditional suture group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.883, P=0.049). No hospital infection occurred. The healing period averaged (15.1±4.7) days, and the patients were followed up for 2 months without any complication of abdominal incision in all the patients. ConclusionSuture without subcutaneous ligature is simple and easy to practice, with precise effect, which deserves clinical application.
ObjectiveTo research the effect of different surgical sutures on abdominal surgical incision healing quality, and provide a novel theory basis for promoting the healing of incision of abdominal wall. MethodsTotally 341 patients who underwent laparotomy were collected from general surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, and they were randomly divided into three groups: the including polydioxanoneⅡ(PDSⅡ) suture group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively sutured with PDSⅡsuture; the Vicryl group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively suture with antibacterial Vicryl; and the common silk thread group, abdominal wall incision was performed layering intermittent silk suture. ResultsIn terms of suture time, the PDSⅡsuture group [(11.23±1.62) min〕was significantly lower than the Vicryl group [(14.04±1.20) min〕, P < 0.05, and also both were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group [(21.95±1.95) min〕, P < 0.05. In respect of rejection reaction, incision infection and incision split, the PDSⅡsuture group and the Vicryl group were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group (P < 0.05), but compared the PDSⅡsuture group with the Vicryl group, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding post operation hospitalization duration, fat liquefaction and effusion, compared the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionFull fascia is successively suture with PDSⅡsutures and antibacterial Vicryl suture that can significantly shorten the suture time, reduce the incidence of rejection incision, wound infection and wound dehiscence and promote the postoperative recovery of the patients.