Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of acetabulum reinforcement ring (Cage) with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision. Methods Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (14 hips) with serious acetabular bone defects after total hip arthroplasty underwent acetabular reconstruction by using Cage with allograft bone. There were 6 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59.2 years (range, 45-76 years). The mean time between first replacement and revision was 7.2 years (range, 5-12 years). The revision causes included infection in 8 cases, osteolysis and aseptic loosening in 6 cases. The hip function Harris score was 37.7 ± 5.3. According to America Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) standard, the acetabular defect was classified as type III in 8 cases and as type IV in 6 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication occurred. The patients were followed up 14-62 months (mean, 44 months). The pain was relieved or disappeared. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.7 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 44.40, P=0.04). No loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis was found in 14 hips. No absorption or collapse of the allograft was observed in all patients. Conclusion Cage with allograft bone is a useful method of reconstructing acetabular bone defects in hip revision. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness.
Objective To study the operative methods and therapeutic effects of acetabulum reinforcement ring in the reconstruction of acetabular defects in primary and revisional artificial hip replacement. Methods From November 2000 to July 2005, 14 cases (15 hips) of severe acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement were treated with acetabulum reinforcement ring combined autogenous or allogenic bone transplantation, including 7 males and 8 females aged 34-72 years with an average of 55 years. Among them, 9 cases (9 hips) underwent artificial hip joint revision, which was 3-22 years (average8.9 years) far away from their primary replacement, and 5 cases (6 hi ps) received primary replacement, including 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis of both hips, 1 osteoarthritis caused by acetabular dysplasia, 1 femoral head resection due to debridement of hi p infection, 1 nonunion of acetabulum old fracture with the center dislocation of femoral head and 1 old acetabulum fracture. The disease course was 2-25 years (average 11.6 years). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, the acetabulum defects of 7 hips were categorized into Type II, 6 hips were Type III and 2 hips were Type IV. Harris score was (59.1 ± 15.4) points preoperatively. Results All wounds were healed by first intention. The symptom of sciatic nerve simulation was occurred in 1 case and was rel ieved after taking neuroprotective drug for 5 months. All the cases were followed up for 33-90 months (average 51.3 months). Harris score at the final follow-up was (81.9 ± 10.4) points, indicating there was a significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.01). X-ray film demonstrated that the displacement of acetabulum reinforcement ring and acetabular cup was less than 5 mm, the rotation was less than 5°, and there was no progressive radiolucent zone around acetabulum and screw. Conclusion Acetabulum reinforcement ring is beneficial to reconstruct severe acetabular defects, improve hip joints’ function and provide primary stabil ity for putting acetabular cup into an ideal biomechanical position.
【Abstract】 Objective Through a retrospective study, to observe the cl inical therapeutic effect for closed reductiontreatment of developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH), and to dynamically analyze characteristics of acetabular development after closed reduction in DDH. Methods A total of 100 single side DDH children who were treated by “the treatment mode of closed reduction” from January 2002 to December 2005 were followed up, including 18 males and 82 females, with the average age of 19.4 months (ranging from 7 months to 36 months). Sixty-eight patients had left side dislocation, while 32 had right side dislocation. According to Zionts dislocation grades, 15 cases were degree I, 50 degree II, 26 degree III and 9 degree IV. Adductor tenotomies and skeletal traction were carried out in 74 cases, while direct closed reduction was performed in 26 cases. The four-level functional evaluation criterion was used to assess the cl inical therapeutic effect. Lesional and homeochronous normal hips were paired, and acetabular index (AI) and AI (D/W) of lesional and normal hips, before the reduction and in the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month, respectively, after the reduction, were dynamically measured. Results The total choiceness rate of 100 children was 88.00%. Twelve months after the reduction, lesional AI decreased from (37.17 ± 2.17) º to (27.02 ± 3.54) º, while lesional AI(D/W) increased from 22.06% ± 1.65% to 29.80% ± 3.56%, and the differences among each time-point had statistical significance (P lt; 0.01). Both rates of lesional AI decrease and AI(D/W) increase were obviously faster than those of normal side physiological development (P lt; 0.01). In all durations after 12 months reduction, the rates of lesional AI were (3.22 ± 1.42) º and (3.41 ± 2.03) º in 1 - 3 months and 10 - 12 months , respectively, and the rates of AI(D/W) were 2.69% ± 1.83%and 2.33% ± 1.13%, respectively, and they were obviously faster than the other durations (P lt; 0.01). Both rates of lesional AI decrease and AI(D/W) increase were obviously faster than the homeochronous rate of normal side physiological development in each duration (P lt; 0.01). The rates of lesional AI were (13.71 ± 3.96) º and (11.48 ± 4.15) º in 7 - 12 age group and 13 - 18 age group, respectively, and the rates of AI(D/W) were 9.95% ± 3.81% and 8.28% ± 3.58%, respectively, and they wereobviously faster than the other age groups (P lt; 0.05). Both changes of lesional AI and AI(D/W) were obviously faster than the homeochronous changes of normal side in each age group(P lt; 0.01). Conclusion There are simple operating requirements and fine therapeutic effect of “the treatment mode of closed reduction” . Within 12-month after the closed reduction treatment, the rate of lesional acetabular development is obviously faster than that of normal side physiological development. The cresttime of lesional acetabular development is during 1 - 3 months and 10 - 12 months, and the best treatment time of closed reduction is the age before 18 months.
【Abstract】 Objective To summarize techniques of the total hi p arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hi p (DDH) with severe osteoarthritis in adults. Methods From March 2000 to January 2006, 24 patients (27 hips) with DDH were treated by THA with an cementless cup. There were 7 males and 17 females, withthe average age of 49.6 years (ranging from 26 years to 63 years). Unilateral DDH occurred in 21 patients and bilateral DDH occurred in 3 patients. Based on the Crowe classification, there were 16 hips in 15 patients of type I, 4 hips in 4 patients of type II, 4 hips in 3 patients of type III, 3 hips in 2 patients of type IV. Except for 3 patients with bilateral DDH, the other patients’ ill lower l imbs were 2-7 cm shorter than the healthy lower ones. Results All the patients were followed up from 9 months to 6.5 years and no one had infection, dislocation, femur fracture and so on after the operation. In 18 patients, the pain was completely rel ieved and the function of the hip joints was good. After the gluteus medius exercise, the claudication of 3 patients after the operation disappeared. In 3 patients, the ill lower l imbs were more than 1 cm shorter than the healthy lower ones and the other patients’ ill lower l imbs were less than 1 cm shorter than the healthy lower ones. Two patients’ lower l imbs were been lengthened 4-5 cm. All the patients’ sciatic nerves were not injured. The Harris scores were 46.5 ± 7.2 preoperatively and 84.0 ± 5.7 postoperatively (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion THA with deepening the medial wall of the acetabulum at the true acetabulum and choosing small cementless cup in adult could obtain favorable results.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of modified Stoppa approach with medial wall spring plate (MWSP) for involving quadrilateral of acetabulum fracture. MethodsBetween March 2008 and September 2013, 38 patients with involving quadrilateral of acetabulum fracture were treated, including of 23 males and 15 females with an average age of 36.08 years (range, 19-56 years). The causes included traffic accidents injury (21 cases), crash injury of heavy object (10 cases), and falling injury from height (7 cases). The interval of injury and admission was 3 hours to 2 days (mean, 11 hours). There were 12 cases of anterior column fracture (type D), 5 cases of transverse fractures (type E), 8 cases of T shaped fractures (type H), 6 cases of anterior column fracture with posterior transverse fractures (type I), and 7 cases of double column fractures (type J) according to Letournel-Judet classification. Based on fracture types, MWSP was used to fix fracture by modified Stoppa approach in 19 cases or combined with the ilioinguinal approach in 10 cases or combined with Kocher-Langenbeck approach in 9 cases. The operation time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The effectiveness of reduction and the hip function were evaluated according to Matta score system and Merled' Aubigne and Postel score system. ResultsThe operation time was 85-210 minutes (mean, 130 minutes).The intra-operative blood loss was 450-900 mL (mean, 650 mL). There were 1 case of vascular avulsion, and 1 case of bladder injury during operation; there were 8 cases of venous thrombosis and 2 cases of fat liquefaction of incision after operation. Screw was implanted into the articular joint in 1 case on CT after operation. Matta X-ray assessment showed anatomical reduction in 9 cases, satisfactory reduction in 24 cases, and unsatisfactory reduction in 5 cases, and the satisfaction rate of reduction was 86.84%. Three patients had limb shorting of 0.8-1.0 cm when compared with normal limb. All patients were followed up for 7 to 18 months with an average of 10 months. Fractures healed well within 13-16 weeks with an average of 14 weeks. At 1 year after operation, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 21 cases, general in 5 cases, and poor in 3 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 78.95% according to the Merled'Aubigne and Postel hip score standards. ConclusionInvolving quadrilateral of acetabulum fracture can be fixed with MWSP by modified Stoppa approach or combined with other approaches to obtain good exposure, less invasion, satisfactory reduction, stable fixation, and low complications.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of different surgical approaches in the treatment of acetabular both-column fractures.MethodsThe domestic and foreign related research literature on surgical approaches for acetabular both-column fractures was extensively consulted. The anatomical characteristics, exposure ranges, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of various common surgical approaches for both-column fractures were mainly summarized.ResultsThe ilioinguinal approach is more suitable for both-column fractures if the anterior column fracture is complicated or combined with the anterior wall fracture while the posterior column fracture is simple and stable. The modified Stoppa approach or the lateral (para) rectus abdominal approach is the preferred choice when both-column fractures are combined with a quadrilateral fracture or femoral head dislocation. What’s more, the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is required when the posterior column fractures are complicated or combined with posterior wall fractures. In addition, the simultaneous ilioinguinal and Kocher-Langenbeck approaches are the first choices when the both-column fractures possessing extremely severe and obvious displacement.ConclusionThe reasonable choice of surgical approach is extremely important for acetabular both-column fractures. Each surgical approach has its advantages and limitations. It is necessary to take the precise reposition of the acetabular joint surface as the principle, and comprehensively judge the fracture types and severity of anterior column, posterior column, and square area, and then select the optimal surgical approach for surgical treatment.