Objective To review the progress in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods Recent literature about the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture was reviewed and analyzed. Results Treatments of acute Achilles tendon rupture include operative and non-operative treatments. Operative treatments include open surgery and percutaneous minimally invasive surgery. Compared with non-operative treatment, operative treatment can effectively reduce the re-rupture incidence, but it had higher complication incidences of wound infection and nerve injury. Although early functional rehabilitation during non-operative treatment could reduce the re-rupture incidence, there is no consistent orthopaedic device and guideline for functional rehabilitation. Conclusion Both operative and non-operative treatments have advantages and disadvantages for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. No consistent conclusion is arrived regarding functional recovery. Future studies should explore the strategy of early functional rehabilitation during non-operative treatment and its mechanism of promoting tendon healing.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the 3 methods (traditional open Achilles tendon anastomosis, minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon anastomosis, and Achilles tendon anastomosis limited incision) for acuteAchilles tendon rupture so as to provide a reference for the choice of cl inical treatment plans. Methods Between December 2007 and March 2010, 69 cases of acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated by traditional open Achilles tendon anastomosis (traditional group, n=23), by minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon anastomosis (minimally invasive group, n=23), and by Achilles tendon anastomosis l imited incision (l imited incision group,n=23). There was no significant difference in gender, age, mechanism of injury, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score between 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results Minimally invasive group and limited incision group were significantly better than traditional group in hospital ization days and blood loss (P lt; 0.01). Incision infection occurred in 2 cases of traditional group, and healing of incision by first intention was achieved in all patients of the other 2 groups, showing significant difference in the complication rate (P lt; 0.05). Re-rupture of Achilles tendon occurred in 1 case (4.3%) of minimally invasive group and limited incision group respectively; no re-rupture was found in traditional group (0), showing significant difference when compared with the other 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). All cases were followed up 12-18 months with an average of 14.9 months. The function of the joint was restored. The AOFAS score was more than 90 points in 3 groups at 12 months after operation, showing no significant difference among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The above 3 procedures can be used to treat acute Achilles tendon rupture. However, minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon anastomosis and Achilles tendon anastomosis limited incision have the advantages of less invasion, good heal ing, short hospital ization days, and less postoperative complication, and have the disadvantage of increased risk for re-rupture of Achilles tendon after operations.
ObjectiveTo summarize the latest research progress of early postoperative rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon rupture after surgical repair.MethodsThe high-quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses regarding early postoperative rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon rupture in recent years were reviewed.ResultsThere are three functional rehabilitations after acute Achilles tendon rupture surgery, including early postoperative mobilization, early weight-bearing with immobilization, and early weight-bearing combined with mobilization. The results of randomized controlled trials show that the effectiveness of early postoperative rehabilitation is similar or better than the early postoperative immobilization. The results of systematic reviews/meta-analyses show that the early postoperative rehabilitation is beneficial to the early function recovery of the Achilles tendon, can reduce the time for functional recovery, and do not adversely affect the outcomes.ConclusionEarly postoperative rehabilitation is beneficial to the functional recovery, and do not increase postoperative complications. There is still no uniform protocol of early postoperative rehabilitation and the timing of weight-bearing, and further studies are needed in the future.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of a transverse small incision intrathecal “loop” minimally invasive suture for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods The clinical data of 30 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with transverse small incision intrathecal “loop” minimally invasive suture between January 2022 and October 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were all male, aged from 29 to 51 years, with an average of 39.8 years. The cause of injury was acute sports injury, and the time from injury to operation was 1-14 days, with an average of 3.4 days. The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative complications, wound healing, and hospital stay were recorded. Postoperative appearance and function of ankle were evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, and Arner-Lindholm score. Results The operation time ranged from 30 to 90 minutes, with an average of 54.2 minutes; the incision length ranged from 1.3 to 3.5 cm, with an average of 2.2 cm; the intraoperative blood loss ranged from 5 to 70 mL, with an average of 22.3 mL; and the hospital stay ranged from 2 to 6 days, with an average of 3.7 days. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no incision infection, poor healing, and deep venous thrombosis. All patients were followed up 5.3-22.0 months (mean, 14.7 months). During the follow-up, all the 30 patients had returned to exercise, and there was no complication such as Achilles tendon re-rupture, postoperative infection, and gastrocnemius muscle injury. At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 82-100, with an average of 95.1; the VSS score was 1-4, with an average of 2.1; according to the Arner-Lindholm score, 24 cases were rated as excellent and 6 cases as good. Conclusion Transverse small incision intrathecal “loop” minimally invasive suture for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture has the advantages of simple instrument, convenient operation, small trauma, quick recovery, and satisfactory effectiveness.
Objective To evaluate the positional relationship between protective channel and sural nerve while treating acute Achilles tendon rupture with channel assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique based on anatomical observations of cadaver specimens. Methods Twelve adult cadaveric lower limb specimens (6 left, 6 right) were utilized. A CAMIR device was implanted at a distance of 4 cm from the proximal end of the specimen to the Achilles tendon insertion. The skin was incised along the tendon’s medial side, the sural nerve was dissected, and the positional relationship with the protective channel was observed. The distance from the sural nerve-Achilles tendon intersection to the calcaneal insertion, the vertical distance between protective channel and the calcaneal insertion, and the horizontal distance between the sural nerve and protective channel were measured by using vernier caliper. Results Anatomical examination demonstrated a variable positional relationship between the sural nerve and protective channel, with the sural nerve positioned above (8 specimens) or below (4 specimens) the protective channel. The distance from the sural nerve-Achilles tendon intersection to the calcaneal insertion was (105.67±14.94) mm, the vertical distance between protective channel and the calcaneal insertion was (93.20±9.57) mm, and the horizontal distance between the sural nerve and protective channel was (0.31±0.14) mm. Conclusion The use of CAMIR technique for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture can effectively avoid iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve.