ObjectiveTo discuss the pattern of lymph node metastasis for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and its appropriate surgical approach. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 162 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent curative resection in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2007 through February 2010. The patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical approach, including 96 patients in a left thoracic group, 20 patients in an Ivor-Lewis group and 46 patients in an abdominal group. ResultsThere were 120 patients with lymph node metastasis. The lymph node metastatic rate was 74.1%. Simple thoracic lymph node metastasis was observed only in 2 patients (1.7%), 98 patients (81.7%) with simple abdominal lymph node metastasis, and 20 patients (16.6%) with both capacity lymph node metastasis. The thoracic approaches had an advantage in dissection lower mediastinal lymph node over the abdominal approach, while for the abdominal lymph node the result was reversed. There are 11 groups of lymph node with a more than 10% metastatic rate. ConclusionsThe abdominal lymph nodes are the dominating metastatic area of Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, but some important groups of lower mediastinal lymph node should be removed. In terms of curative resection of tumor, the Ivor-Lewis operated by a thoracic surgeon who is more familiar with the abdominal lymph node may be a reasonable choice.
ObjectiveThe main objective of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in the treatment of Siewert Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. MethodsThis study conducted a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.4 software to compare the efficacy and safety of proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in the treatment of Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP were searched for relevant literature published through March 2023. ResultsThis study included a total of 23 articles, among which 16 were retrospective studies, 5 were prospective studies, and 2 were RCT. In total, 2826 patients, 1389 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy and 1437 patients underwent total gastrectomy. Meta-analysis showed that proximal gastrectomy had less intraoperative bleeding than total gastrectomy [MD=-19.85, 95% CI (-37.20, -2.51), P=0.02] and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Total gastrectomy had a higher number of lymph node dissections than proximal gastrectomy [MD=-6.20, 95% CI (-7.68, -4.71), P<0.00001] and a lower incidence of reflux esophagitis [MD=3.02, 95% CI (1.24, 7.34), P=0.01]. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between the two procedures in terms of operative time, postoperative OS (1-year OS, 3-year OS, 5-year OS) and total postoperative complications (P>0.05). ConclusionProximal gastrectomy had an advantage in terms of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative length of stay, whereas total gastrectomy had an advantage in terms of number of lymph nodes cleared and incidence of reflux esophagitis, with no significant difference in long-term survival between the two procedures.