The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes released by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) is one of the most important guidelines for clinicians. Based on the latest evidence of clinical studies, the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes is annually updated by ADA. The statements of ADA on diagnosis, assessment, and management in diabetes are recommended for clinicians, patients, and researchers. The latest edition of Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes was published in a supplementary issue of Diabetes Care in January 2018. This interpretation will focus on the updated contents and their best evidence and clinical importance in this guideline.
Objective To evaluate evidence from American medical risk monitoring and precaution system (AMRMPS) which may affect the construction of Chinese medical risk monitoring and precaution system (CMRMPS). Methods We searched relevant databases and Internet resources to identify literature on AMRMPS, medical errors, and patient safety. We used the quality evaluation system for medical risk management literature to extract and evaluate data. Results In 1999, a report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) not only showed the severity and cause of medical errors in America but also gave the solution of it. In 2000, the Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) was appointed to assess the IOM report and take specific steps to improve AMRMPS. After 5 years, a well-developed medical risk management system was established with the improvement in the public awareness of medical errors, patient safety, performance criteria of medical safety, information technology and error reporting system. There was still some weakness of this system in risk precaution and prevention. Conclusion The experience from AMRMPS can be used to establish the CMRMPS. Firstly, we should disseminate and strengthen the awareness of medical risk and patient safety in public. Secondly, we should establish hospital audit system which includes auditing of medical staff and course of medical risk in continuing and academic education. Thirdly, we should develop regulations and guidelines on health care, medical purchase and drug supply which will benefit in management of regular work. Fourthly, we should develop computer information system for hospital which will regulate the management without the disturbance from human. Lastly, we should emphasize outcome evaluations and strive for perfection during the process.
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common human skin tumor. In recent years, the incidence of cSCC is increasing annually. Although most cSCC is curable after basic treatment, the advanced cSCC progresses rapidly and poses a significant risk for the impact on quality of life and death. In 2017, the latest version of cSCC management guideline was developed by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) based on extensive evidence-based medical evidence, including cSCC biopsy techniques, histopathological assessment, clinical staging and grading, surgical and nonsurgical treatment, follow-up, recurrence prevention, and management of the advanced cSCC. The purpose of this article is to briefly introduce and interpretate this guideline.
In November 2017, the American Heart Association updated the pediatric basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. The new guidelines focused on the clinical value of chest compression-only CPR versus CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths in children, rather than a comprehensive revision of the 2015 edition guidelines. The Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated part content of the guidelines according to the continuous evidence review process. Guidelines recommend CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths should be provided for infants and children with cardiac arrest. Bystanders provide chest compressions if they are unwilling or unable to deliver rescue breaths. This article mainly interprets the updated content.
In the late-breaking trials session of the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2021, which took place in November 2021, six clinical trials in cardiac surgery published their primary results. This review will look into three of them including the management of patients with moderate or less-than-moderate tricuspid regurgitation at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation, timing of ticagrelor cessation before coronary artery bypass grafting, and long-term outcomes of ticagrelor-based antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery bypass grafting.
The management of malignant pleural effusion remains a clinical challenge. In November 2018, American Thoracic Society, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society of Thoracic Radiology summarized the recent advances and provided 7 recommendations for clinical problems of the management of malignant pleural effusion. This paper interprets these recommendations to provide references for management and research on malignant pleural effusion.
In the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2021, the results of six clinical trials related to cardiovascular surgery were revealed. The PALACS trial demonstrated that posterior left pericardiotomy during open heart surgery was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation; the EPICCURE study found that injection of mRNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A mRNA) directly into the myocardium of patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improved patients’ heart function; the VEST trial once again proved the safety and potential value of external stent for vein graft. This article will interpret the above-mentioned three studies.
In October 2020, the American Heart Association issued the 2020 edition of guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiovascular first aid, which comprehensively revised cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care guidelines related to adults, children, newborns, resuscitation education science and treatment system. According to the latest edition of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s classes of recommendation and levels of evidence, relevant suggestions are put forward. This article interprets the main updated and revised content, including children’s basic and advanced life support and neonatal resuscitation, in order to better guide emergency personnel and improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiovascular first aid.
Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death worldwide. A large body of epidemiologic evidence suggests that regular physical activity (PA) and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness can prevent the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. "Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health: a clinical practice statement of the ASPC" released in December, 2022 by the American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) and provided the most up-to-date guidance on the associations and mechanisms between PA and cardiorespiratory fitness, the development of exercise prescriptions, and exercise-associated cardiovascular risk. In this article, the main content of this guideline was interpreted, aiming to develop a more scientific exercise prescription for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Objective To summarize and analyze the working experience of hospital performance evaluation and reporting system in America, so as to provide decision support to China on such work as establishing objective, scientific and effective hospital performance evaluation system, strengthening government’s supervision to health service, and promoting hospitals’ sound development.Methods American official websites and databases were searched to include relative policies, reports and documents on hospitals’ performance evaluation. Results Typical hospital performance evaluation and reporting system in America included National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CAHPS), Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), Leapfrog Group Evaluation System and Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals. Conclusion The enlightenments of American performance performance evaluation systems to China include: a) more attention should be paid to performance evaluation; b) combined evaluation models and results application methods should be considered; c) comparatively scientific evaluation methods and comprehensive evaluation contents should be established.