Objective To evaluate preventive effectiveness of pocket esophagogastric anastomosis for postoperativeanastomotic leak，stricture and gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD），and investigate clinical significance of Montreal definition and classification of GERD after esophageal reconstruction. Methods Clinical data of 1 078 patients whoreceived 2 different surgical procedures for resection of esophageal or cardiac carcinoma from June 2007 to June 2011 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. In the experimental group，there were 582 patients who received pocketesophagogastric anastomosis，including 403 male and 179 female patients with their age of 60.4±12.6 years. There were 399 patients with esophageal carcinoma and 183 patients with cardiac carcinoma，392 patients receiving esophagogastrostomyabove the aortic arch and 190 patients receiving esophagogastrostomy below the aortic arch respectively. In the control group，there were 496 patients who received conventional end-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis，including 343 male and 153 female patients with their age of 59.2±12.8 years. There were 322 patients with esophageal carcinoma and 174 patients with cardiac carcinoma，317 patients receiving esophagogastrostomy above the aortic arch and 179 patients receivingesophagogastrostomy below the aortic arch respectively. A survey questionnaire was made on the basis of relevant diagnosticstandards to investigate the incidence of postoperative anastomotic stricture and GERD of the 2 groups during follow-up.Results The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group ［0% （0/582）versus 1.0% （5/496），χ2=5.835，P=0.016］. Patients in the experimental group had less severeGERD symptoms，and the percentage of patients who needed antacid therapy for extraesophageal symptoms of GERD ofthe experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group ［1.6% （33/541） versus 12.6% （57/453），χ2=23.564，P=0.000］. The incidence of anastomotic stricture of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of thecontrol group ［0.9% （5/539） versus 7.3% （34/465），χ2=25.124，P=0.000］，and especially，the incidence of severe anastomoticstricture of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group ［0% （0/539） versus 4.7% （22/465），χ2=24.883，P=0.000］. There was no statistical difference in five-year survival rate. Conclusion Pocket esophagogastric anastomosis is better than conventional end-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for the prevention of postoperative anastomoticleak，stricture and GERD. Montreal definition and classification of GERD is suitable for the diagnosis of postoperativeGERD after esophageal reconstruction.
Objective To investigate whether intraductal electrocautery incision （IEI） could decrease the recurrence of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures （PTAS） after conventional endoscopic intervention of balloon dilatation （BD） and plastic stenting （PS）. Methods The clinical data of 27 patients with PTAS who were given endoscopic treatment of BD＋PS or IEI＋BD＋PS in our hospital from January 2007 to October 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Results The treatment of BD＋PS was initially successful in 9 of 11 （81.8%） cases， but showed recurrence in 5 of 9 （55.6%）. The treatment of IEI＋BD＋PS was initially successful in 14 of 16 （87.5%） cases, and the recurrence was observed only in 3 of 14 （21.4%）. The total diameter of inserted plastic stents in IEI＋BD＋PS group was significantly greater than that in BD＋PS group 〔（12±3.2） Fr vs. （8±1.3） Fr，P=0.039〕. All recurrences were successfully retreated by IEI＋BD＋PS. Procedure-related complications included pancreatitis in 5 cases （18.5%）, cholangitis in 8 cases （29.6%）, bleeding after EST in 1 cases （3.7%）, which were all cured with medical treatment. No complications related to intraductal endocautery incision procedure such as bleeding and perforation were observed. Median follow-up after completion of endoscopic therapy was 22 months （range 1-49 months）. Conclusions Intraductal electrocautery incision is an effective and safe supplement to balloon dilatation and plastic stenting treatment of PTAS, which can decrease the recurrence of anastomotic strictures in conventional endoscopic intervention.
ObjectiveTo discuss the relation between bile duct anastomotic stricture and bile duct injury by endo-scopic observation following liver transplantation and it, s efficacy of endoscopic treatment. Method The clinical data of 24 cases of bile duct anastomotic stricture following liver transplantation diagnosed by cholangiography were analyzed retro-spectively. Results①Twenty-four cases of bile duct anastomotic strictures were included in 3 cases of typeⅠa, 2 cases of typeⅠb, 4 cases of typeⅡ, 1 case of typeⅢa, 5 cases of typeⅢb, and 9 cases of typeⅢc.②The redness of intrahepatic bile duct mucosa, banding erosion, ulcer and fusion of anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅠa andⅢa. The redness of intrahepatic bile duct and anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅡwithout ulcer and fusion. The extensive erosion and ulcer of intrahepatic bile duct and redness of anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅢb. The extensive erosion, ulcer and partial necrosis of intrahepatic bile duct and anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅠb andⅢc.③Seventeen cases were cured by choledochoscopy through T tube, the biliary casts were moved out and the anastomotic strictures were relieved by balloon dilatation and placement of plastic stenting for 2 to 6 months, no recurrence happened. One case of typeⅠb treated by percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage(PTCD) and percuta-neous transhepatic cholangioscopy(PTCS) was developed into the stricture of typeⅡduring following-up for 19 months. Two cases of typeⅠa were treated by ERCP, the biliary casts were moved, one of which was cured, another 1 case was developed into the stricture of typeⅡduring following-up for 5 months. Two cases of typeⅡwere treated by ERCP, the biliary casts were moved, balloon dilatation and placement of plastic stent were performed, one of which was cured, another 1 case was recurrent during following-up for 1 months. The strictures were not relieved by multiple plastic stents for 4 to 6 months in 3 patients with recurrence and progress, but which was relieved by full-covered self-expanding removable metal stents for 4 to 7 months, there was no recurrence during following-up. One case of typeⅢb and one case of typeⅢc received the secondary open operation or choledochoscopy and placement of plastic stent for biliary infection and jaundice after the treatment of ERCP were cured. ConclusionsBiliary stricture following liver transplantation accompanies different degree biliary injury. The slightest is typeⅡand typeⅠa, typeⅢa is the second, typeⅢb is more serious, and typeⅠb and typeⅢc are the worst. Choledochoscopy is a better choose for anastomotic strictures. ERCP is not a better choose for anastomotic strictures of typeⅠb, Ⅲb, andⅢc.