Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sevoflurane versus ketamine in the anesthesia of child short period surgery. Methods Such databases as EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBMdisc, Ongoing Controlled Trial and Conference Articles were searched from their establishment to April 2011 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the quasi-RCTs. The quality of those studies meeting the inclusive criteria was assessed, the data were extracted and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1.1 software. Results Ten studies involving 600 participants were included. Seven studies showed that the intraoperative heart rate of the sevoflurane group was lower than that of the ketamine group (MD= –11.85, 95%CI –16.47 to –7.23, Plt;0.000 01). Nine studies showed that the revival time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –29.05, 95%CI –37.98 to –20.12, Plt;0.000 01). Three studies showed that the anesthesia induction time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –208.45, 95%CI –359.22 to –57.68, P=0.007). Six studies showed that the influence on mean arterial pressure (MAP) had no significante difference (MD= –4.86, 95%CI –10.02 to 0.29, P=0.06). Meanwhile, seven studies showed that the adverse events of the sevoflurane group were fewer than those of the ketamine group (Peto OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.40, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion The results of this system review show that sevoflurane is more effective than ketamine with fewer adverse reactions, and it provides a new choice for clinical anesthesia for child short period surgery. However, ketamine is still the main drug in clinical anesthesia for the child short period surgery at present, so high quality studies are needed for further clinical researches.
Objective To evaluate the indications, effectiveness and complications of vitreoretinal surgery using the 25G transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system (TSV25G) under the topical anesthesia. Methods The clinical and follow-up data of 22 eyes of 22 patients undergone vitreo-retinal surgery using TSV25G under the topical anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed. All of the patients were monocular sickened, including idiopathic macular hole in 10 eyes, idiopathic macular pucker in 6, vitreoretinal traction syndrome in 4, and vitreous hemorrhage associated with branch retinal vein occlusion in 2. Peeling of epiretinal membrane and/or internal limiting membrane, intra ocular laser coagulation, air-fluid exchange and tamponiding of C3F8 were performed according to the condition of diseases. The postoperative follow-up was 1-11 months, with the mean duration of 6.4 months. The effect of analgesia, cooperation with the patients, operative effect and complications in and after the surgery were observed. Results The operations finished successfully in all of the eyes under the topical anesthesia. The operation duration ranged from 20 to 25 minutes with average of 22 minutes. The patients cooperated with the doctor well without any discomfort. Two days after the surgery, edema of the wounded conjunctiva was found, and recovered 7 days later. A light pigment dot on the surface of the sclera could be seen at the first month. The complic ations included transient increasing of intraocular pressure in 2 eyes, feather-like opacity of lens in 5 eyes, vitreous hemorrhage in 1 eye, and air-bleb under conjunctiva in 2 eyes. No other complications related with the cut were fo und. The macular hole closed in 9 eyes with idiopathic macular hole, and the other 1 had the smaller but not closed hole. Idiopathic macular pucker, vitreoretinal traction syndrome, and vitreous hemorrhage associated with branch retinal vein occlusion were cured successfully. Conclusions Vitreoretinal surgery using the TSV25G under the topical anesthesia has many advantages such as simple procedure, short operation time, micro-invasion, less complications and rapid revovery, and mainly serves simple manipulation in some simple diseases such as idiopathic macular hole, vitreo-retinal traction syndrome, and simple hemorrhage. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2004，20：133-136)
Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative body temperature on the survival of skin flap grafting. Methods From July 2005 to November 2006, 50 cases of Ⅰ-Ⅱ grade patients undergoing elective skin flap grafting were randomly divided 2 groups. Pharyngeal temperature (PT) and skin temperature(ST) were monitored and recorded every 15 minutes. Operativetime, anesthetic time, time from the end of operation to extubation, the volume of blood transfusion, the volume of fluid transfusion and the flap survival 7 days after operation were recorded. In the experimental group, the body temperature was maintained in normal range with water market and forced air heater. In the control group， the body temperature was only monitored without any treatment. Results There were no significant differences in operating room temperature, operative time, anesthetic time, the volume of blood transfusion and fluid transfusion between 2 groups(Pgt;0.05). After induction, PT decreased gradually inboth groups during the first 45 minutes, compared with the time point of intubation(Plt;0.05),but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups(Pgt;0.05); and ST rose in both groups during the first45 minutes, compared with the time point of intubation (Plt;0.05). After 45 minutes of induction, in the experimental group, PT was in the normal range(36℃), and ST didn’t change compared with that of the timepoint of induction(Pgt;0.05). In the control group, both PT and ST decreasedgradually and timedependently compared with the time point of intubation (Plt;0.05). In the experimental group, PT and ST at each time point were higher than those in the control group (Plt;0.05). All the skin flap grafts survived in the experimental group, and skin flap grafts necrosed in 2 cases in the control group.Conclusion Keeping normal body temperature can improve the survival ofskin flap grafting. Therefore, the body temperature should be monitored and maintained in a normal range.
Objective To explore the clinical application of the postanesthetic autologus donation and the post-operative transfusion during the knee and hipreplacement surgeries. Methods Thirty-three patients (17 males,16 females) admitted for the elective joint replacement surgeries from September 2004 to January 2005 were included in this study. Of the 33 patients, 5 were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, 23 with femoral head necrosis, and 5 with knee osteoarthritis. Immediately after anesthesia, 400 ml of the blood was drawn and transfused after the surgery. The blood pressure was monitored during the blood drawing, postoperative blood parameters were recorded, surgical site drainage and signs of infections were observed, and the other clinical data were collected.Results Of the 33 patients, 27 only received autologoustransfusion, including 21 patients who underwent the unilateral hip replacement and 6 patients who underwent the unilateral knee replacement. All these 6 patients with the unilateral knee replacement received the blood drained from the surgical sites in addition to the blood obtained from the postanesthetic autologous donation. Another 6 cases with the bilateral hip and knee replacement received the blood drained from the surgical sites, the blood obtained from the post-anesthetic autologous donation and 400 ml of the allogeneic blood transfusion. The blood received postoperatively averaged 650 ml (range, 200-1 150 ml), haemoglobin(Hb) was averaged 88 g/L (68-102 g/L), and Hct was averaged 24.6% (20.5% 31.5%). Hb and Hct were lower after operation than before operation(Plt;0.01). Conclusion Postoperative blood transfusion following the postanesthetic and preoperative autologous donation can be successfully applied to most of the patients undergoing theknee or hip replacement so as to reduce complications of the allogeneic blood transfusion.
ObjectiveTo observe the incidence of hypotension in general anesthesia patients in post anesthesia care unit (PACU), compare the blood pressure before and after treatment, and analyze hypotension causes. MethodBetween September 2012 and July 2013, data of 18 931 patients in PACU after general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of hypotension. At the same time, the change of blood pressure was also detected before and after treatment. ResultsSixty-two patients had hypotension during the anesthesia recovery period after general anesthesia. The incidence was 0.33%. The proportion was the highest among patients who underwent abdominal surgery, reaching 41.9%. Systolic pressure and diastolic pressure improved significantly after treatment (P<0.05). ConclusionsIt is important to perform comprehensive evaluation of vital signs, closely observe disease conditions and vital sign changes, find out and manage low blood pressure for patients in PACU, which secure their safety.
ObjectiveTo discuss the intraoperative anesthesia management for complete thoracoscopic surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation via the left chest. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 201 patients (106 males and 95 females aged 58.7±15.4 years) with AF underwent complete thoracoscopic surgical ablation via the left chest in Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Xinhua Hospital From September 2010 through December 2013. ResultsAll the patients successfully underwent the minimally invasive ablation procedure. No patient required conversion to sternotomy during the surgery. The average time of operation was 104.9±37.2 min. During the ablation procedure, the patients' blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) reduced at different levels. The average minimum arterial blood pressure was 44-79 (62.4±8.4) mm Hg. The average minimum SpO2 was 83%-95% (88.8%±3.1%). After the ablation, the patients' respiratory function and hemodynamic gradually recovered. The average heart rate was 40-108 (70.0±16.6) bpm when sinus rhythm was restored. The maintenance of sinus rhythm rate was 94.5% (190/201) at discharge. There was no early death, stroke, hemorrhage or permanent pacemaker implantation during perioperation. ConclusionComplete thoracoscopic surgical AF ablation via the left chest has some influence on patients' respiratory function and hemodynamic. Reasonable anesthetic management can ensure the minimally invasive ablation procedure safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effects of nebulized lidocaine anesthesia and anesthesia with lidocaine and midazolam in patients with preoperative bronchoscopy. MethodsTotally, 136 inpatients between May 2002 and June 2013 with preoperative bronchoscopy were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to experimental group and control group with 68 patients in each. For patients in the experimental group, 8 mL of 2% lidocaine was administered through inhalation anesthesia, followed by 2-3 mg bolus of midazolam, and subsequently 0.5 mg of midazolam was administered every 2 minutes depending on patients' awareness. Patients in the control group accepted lidocaine alone for anesthesia. The clinical efficacy and adverse effects of both the two ways of anesthesia were observed. ResultsThe time of sustained and effective anesthesia was (24.5±2.8) minutes in the experimental group, as compared with (16.8±2.1) minutes in the control group (P<0.01). The average amount of consumption of lidocaine was (12.4±1.3) mL in the experimental group, as compared with (16.8±1.5) mL in the control group (P<0.01). The heart rate at 5 min after operation was (81.5±19.5) beats/min in the experimental group, as compared with (94.6±34.6) beats/min in the control group (P<0.01). The mean pulse oxygen saturation at 5 min after operation was (93.5±3.6)% in the experimental group, as compared with (88.2±13.3)% in the control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombined application of lidocaine and midazolam before bronchoscopy is simple and feasible for anesthesia, which has higher success rate, lesser side effects and other reactions such as body movement and coughing.
The anesthetic work of day surgery should be guided by the standardized perioperative evaluation system. The evaluation methods and standards with strong operability and repeatability are the prerequisites to ensure the safety and efficiency of day surgery. For the assessment of patients’ preoperative physiological status, preoperative preparation and postoperative rehabilitation, standardized work procedures should be established to ensure patients’ medical safety to the greatest extent. Through summarizing the advanced management experience of day surgery anesthesia at home and abroad, and combining with the principled suggestions in The Consensus of Chinese Experts on Anaesthesia for Day Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University has repeatedly revised the perioperative anesthesia evaluation methods in practice, and gradually explored a comprehensive, rigorous and standardized perioperative anesthesia evaluation system. This paper will focus on the evaluation of perioperative anesthesia and postoperative follow-up procedures in day surgery.
Since the proposal of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), significant progress has been made in different surgical fields, but ERAS in thoracic surgery is still in its infancy. This article summarizes the research results of scholars at home and abroad, and provides a comprehensive overview of the ERAS anesthesia management pathway during the perioperative period of thoracic surgery from the aspects of preoperative evaluation, anesthesia scheme selection, ventilation strategy, fluid management, temperature protection, pain management, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and early mobilization. The aim is to provide a reference for ERAS management in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.
ObjectiveTo assess impact of typical parameters recommended by enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in elective colorectal surgery, and provide some recommendations for surgeon and anesthesiologist. MethodThe published articles about ERAS program in elective colorectal surgery in recent years were searched in these databases(EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid), the impact of each parameter was evaluated basing on hospital stay and rate of postoperative complications. ResultsAfter analyzing the literatures, the parameters, which were applied in current rehabilitation programs and covered the pre-, intraand post-operative periods in colorectal surgery, were identified as potential impacting consequences of colorectal surgery. Strong agreements were obtained for the following recommendations:① Preoperative management:bowel preparation, fasting, preanesthetic medication, and nutritional care.② Intraoperative management:fluid management, preventing hypothermia, method of surgery and incision, drugs usages of antibiotics, glucocorticoid and prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.③ Postoperative management:managements of drainage tube, nasogastric intubation and urinary catheter, postoperative analgesia, prevention of thromboembolism, and measures of intestinal function recovery (including early mobilization, feeding and chew gum). ConclusionUse of a series of effective measures in ERAS has an effective result, could reduce surgical stress and complications, enhance recovery, shorten hospital stay.