ObjectiveThis study was aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using the AngioJet System for the treatment of lower extremity acute arterial embolism and thrombosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 20 patients with acute lower extremity arterial embolism and thrombosis admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery in the People’s Hospital in Gansu Province where the author worked from September 2016 to March 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with the AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy system. Clinical data of the patients were retrospectively collected. The clinical efficacy of AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy wasanalyzed.ResultsEighteen (90.0%) of the 20 patients successfully completed the mechanical thrombectomy by using the AngioJet System. The mean time for hospital stay and operation was (4.2±1.4) d and (1.3±0.4) h, respectively. The average doses of urokinase and heparin during operation were (35.80±12.30) ×104 U and (45.10±8.30) mg, respectively. Two patients received a complementary treatment of incision for removing the thrombus. Two patients received catheter-directed thrombolysis after the mechanical thrombectomy, 5 patients received bare-metal stent implantation after balloon expansion. Clinical success was in 16 cases. According to the Cooley standard, 10 patients were in excellent condition,6 in good condition, 2 in fair condition, and 2 in poor condition. There were 2 cases of distal arterial embolization,2 cases of antecardial discomfort of bradycardia, and 4 cases of bleeding at the puncture point, but no serious bleeding complications such as gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage occurred. A total of 16 patients presented myoglobinuria during and after operation. All patients were followed up for 6–12 months. The results of ultrasound examination showed that the artery was patency in 15 cases. One patient died of myocardial infarction in 9 months after surgery,2 patients developed lower extremity ischemia symptoms again after surgery, and 2 patients had lower extremity ulcer caused by lower extremity ischemia symptoms. During the follow-up period, no lower limb necrosis, amputation, and death occurred in the remaining patients.ConclusionsThe AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy system is safe and effective. Combined with the use of catheter-directed thrombolysis and stent implantation, the AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy could lead to quick recovery of the perfusion of the lower extremity and improve the limb salvage rates, exhibiting excellent clinical value.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluated the efficacy of AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the treatment of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT).MethodsAccording to the retrieval strategy of Cochrane collaboration network, the relevant literatures in CNKI, WangFang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science at home and abroad up to March 25, 2020 were collected, and the meta analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 20 observational studies were included in the meta analysis. The total number of patients was 1 566, which 799 cases in the AngioJet group and 767 cases in the CDT group. The results showed that the AngioJet group had a higher patency rate of deep vein ［MD=11.34, 95%CI (6.16, 16.51), P<0.000 1］, lower or shorter Villalta score ［MD=–1.90, 95%CI (–2.71, –1.10), P<0.000 01］, incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome［PTS, OR=0.42, 95%CI (0.23, 0.77), P=0.005］, rate of clot reduction grade Ⅰ events ［OR=0.40, 95%CI (0.24, 0.67), P=0.000 5］, incidence of bleeding complication ［OR=0.32, 95%CI (0.21, 0.49), P<0.000 01］, and hospital stay ［MD=–2.96, 95%CI (–3.69, –2.22), P<0.000 01］.ConclusionsIn the early efficacy, AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy has better patency rate of deep vein and thrombolysis, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of bleeding than CDT. In the mid-term effect, AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy could reduce the incidence and the severity of PTS.