ObjectiveBy comparing the difference between different stenosed degree of aortic valve in flow field uniformity and turbulent shear stress (TSS), to explore the relation between flow field uniformity and different stenosed degree of aortic valve, and probe the clinical value for deciding the operation timing, and analyze the possible role of TSS in the progress of the disease.MethodsThe flow field uniformity values and TSS in parasternal long axis plane and apical five cavity plane on each point were measured and calculated by pulse wave Doppler echocardiography technique for 33 patients with different stenosed degree of aortic valve.ResultsThere were significant difference between the different stenosed degree of aortic valve in maximal velocity difference(ΔV max )and TSS( P lt;0.05, 0.01). The more severe the aortic stenosis was, the worse the flow field uniformity was, the lower the TSS was.ConclusionsThere are significant difference between the patients of different stenosed degree of aortic valve in flow field uniformity. Flow field uniformity has important value in classifying the degree of aortic stenosis and deciding the timing of operation. The more severe the aortic stenosis is ,the lower TSS is. It can be thought that low TSS distribution has important role in pathological process of constriction in cardiovascular system diseases.
ObjectiveTo study the nursing methods for patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). MethodsFrom April 2012 to August 2013, 25 patients undergoing TAVI before returning to the coronary care unit (CCU) were included in this study. We reviewed the clinical nursing methods and summarized the clinical nursing experiences. ResultsAmong the 25 patients, there were 1 case complicated with retroperitoneal hematoma, 1 case with hemorrhage of upper digestive tract, 1 case with severe hemorrhage of femoral artery incision site, 1 case with mild hemorrhage of femoral artery puncture site, 1 case with catheter-related infections of right external jugular vein, and 2 cases with hemorrhage related to the loosening of radial artery invasive blood pressure monitoring. All the complications were controlled by reasonable treatments and all the patients were transferred out from CCU with stable vital signs. The mean time of CCU stay was 29 hours ranging from 14 hours to 243 hours. ConclusionDue to special characteristics of patients after TAVI, we should observe carefully, follow the nursing operation rules strictly, discover complications timely, give treatment correctly, and finally ensure the safety of patients during the high risk period.
ObjectiveTo discuss the feasibility about the using of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in severe aortic valve stenosis chinese patients, then to make more exploration and accumulate enough experience. MethodsWe selected 10 out-patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and calcified with 9 males and 1 females at age of 76.4 (65-81) years in our hospital from January 2011 to March 2014. All the patients can't tolerate traditional open surgery through preoperative evaluation. So we chose the Sepian TX system, balloon dilated transcatheter aortic valve, to treat them via transfemoral approach. ResultsTen patients accomplished TAVI successfully. One patient was assisted by the left-ventricular puncture. No complication occurred. The function of aortic valve after TAVI improved significantly. The hospital stay time was 3-5 days. The patients were followed up for 3-34 months. One patient died of pulmonary cancer during the following-up. ConclusionTranscatheter balloon dilated aortic valve replacement can be used in chinese severe aortic valve stenosis patient, but more accurate preoperative preparation, evaluation, and operation are needed.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a mature technology. Because of the complicated valvular anatomy and the severe non-symmetrical valve calcification, the patient with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAVs) once having a lower procedure successful rate, was considered as the relative contradiction for TAVR. However, with the application of the skirted and retrievable next generation prosthesis system, the outcomes of the treatment have been greatly improved. In this article, we summarized the current situation of TAVR applied in BAVs, and the outcomes difference of the old and new generation prosthesis systems.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis (TAV) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).MethodsA computer-based search in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang databases from their date of inception to March 2019 was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted data and evaluated their quality. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 softwares were used for meta-analysis.ResultsThe selected 15 cohort studies contained 45 770 patients, including 1 500 of BAV patients and 44 270 of TAV patients. The results showed that no statistical difference was found in postoperative in-hospital mortality [OR=1.29, 95%CI (0.91, 1.83), P=0.15], 30-day mortality [OR=1.23, 95%CI (0.86, 1.77), P=0.25], and 1-year mortality [OR=1.14, 95%CI (0.87, 1.50), P=0.33] between the two groups. The surgical success rate [OR=0.57, 95%CI (0.44, 0.74), P<0.01], postoperative bleeding events [OR=0.72, 95%CI (0.58, 0.91), P<0.01] and postoperative vascular injury [OR=0.68, 95%CI (0.47, 0.97), P=0.03] of patients in the BAV group were lower than those in the TAV group. The incidence of paravalvular leak in the BAV group was higher than that in the TAV group [OR=1.47, 95%CI (1.13, 1.90), P<0.01]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of conversion to surgery, postoperative myocardial infarction, postoperative renal failure, postoperative neurologic events, postoperative valve gradient difference and pacemaker implantation.ConclusionCompared with TAV, the application of TAVR in BAV patients is feasible and effective.
The patient underwent prostatectomy before two months. After the operation, he suffered from intermittent fever, chest tightness, and suffocation. Combined with the history, symptoms, signs, laboratory examination, echocardiography, imaging examination (CT), and the positive blood culture for Enterococcus faecalis, the admitting diagnosis was aortic stenosis and insufficiency, mitral insufficiency, cardiac function grade Ⅲ (New York Heart Association grade), infective endocarditis, and aneurysm of aortic sinus. After 4-week antimicrobial drug treatment, the patient was in a stable condition with normal body temperature, multiple negative blood cultures, and normal laboratory-related examinations. After careful and sufficient preparation, transcatheter aortic valve replacement operation was performed in the hybrid operating room with 32 mm Venus-A valve. The operation was successful and the patient was discharged on the seventh day after operation. He continued to be treated with antimicrobial drugs for 4 weeks after surgery, and his temperature was normal. He had no chest tightness, asthma, or other symptoms. One, three, and six months after operation, blood tests and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were normal, electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, and echocardiography showed a maximum aortic valve pressure difference of 7 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), no perivalvular leak and no pericardial effusion.
The short-term mortality of patients with severe aortic stenosis is high, which presents a great challenge to clinical treatment. With the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), emergent TAVR brings hope for the treatment of these patients. We present here a case of emergent TAVR procedure. The patient was an elderly male who had previously undergone surgical mitral valve replacement. After fully assessing the risk/benefit of TAVR procedure, emergent TAVR was performed for the patient. The patient was in good condition at two-month follow-up. Emergent TAVR is a good option for critical high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.
An elderly female patient, with systemic multiple organ dysfunction, suffered from severe aortic valve stenosis, was to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). She was intolerance of the computed tomography examination before surgery. Bedside echocardiography was employed to evaluate the patient’s aortic valve stenosis, valve anatomy and type, the condition of aortic root, the distance from coronary to aortic root, and lower-extremity vascular access. Finally, the emergent TAVR was successfully performed under general anesthesia, and the aortic valve trans-prosthetic gradient met a remarkable decrease after surgery.
With the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, it has become the first-line treatment for elderly patients with aortic valve stenosis. A case of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a patient at high risk of coronary artery occlusion was reported. The use of intravascular ultrasound to observe the spatial relationship between the coronary ostia and the valve was the characteristic of this case. This patient was an elderly male who was assessed as a high risk of acute coronary artery occlusion before transcatheter aortic valve replacement. After fully evaluation of the patient’s surgical risks\benefits, the strategy was formulated. Percutaneous coronary intervention was the first step. At the same time, intravascular ultrasound was used to observe the spatial relationship between the coronary ostia and the valve, and balloon was embedded for coronary protection. The procedure went smoothly.
Cardiac conduction block is one of the most common perioperative complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a proportion of which will resolve spontaneously over time, but its incidence has not decreased with the iteration of instruments. It is associated with poor prognosis of patients. The prevention and management strategies of cardiac conduction block after TAVR are still being explored. This paper expounds the mechanism, influence, incidence, predictors, management of cardiac conduction block and indications, timing of permanent pacemaker implantation to provide a reference for the prevention and management of cardiac conduction block after TAVR in clinical practice.