west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Bone substitute" 2 results
  • BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF POROUS POLY LACTIC ACID/BONE MATRIX GELATIN COMPOSITE BIOMATERIALS FOR BONE REPAIR

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the biocompatibility of poly lactic acid/bone matrix gelatin (PLA/BMG) composite biomaterial so as to lay a foundation for bone defect repair. MethodsRats'MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured with leaching solution of PLA/BMG and PLA material respectively for 7 days. The cell proliferation rate was tested by MTT and cell toxicity grading was carried out everyday. The PLA/BMG and MC3T3-E1 cells were co-cultured, the cell shape and proliferation were observed by inverted phase contrast microscope at 1, 3, and 5 days and cell adhesion by scanning electron microscope at 5 days. The PLA and PLA/BMG were implanted subcutaneously in 15 Wistar rats. The histological observation was done, and the thickness of fibrous membrane, the number of inflammatory cells, and the vascularization area were measured at postoperative 2nd, 4th, and 8th week. ResultsThe tests for cytotoxicity in vitro showed that the cell proliferation rates were over 100% and the cell cytotoxic grades were grade 0 at 1-7 days in PLA/BMG group. While in PLA group, the cell proliferation rates were less than 100% and the cell cytotoxic grades were grade 1 at 2, 4, and 7 days. After co-culture of PLA/BMG and MC3T3-E1 cells, cells grew on the surface and in the pores of PLA/BMG, and the cellular morphology was triangle or polygon with abundant microvillus on the surface. After subcutaneous implantation, the rats survived to the end of experiment, and incision healed well. PLA was wrapped by connective tissue where there were a lot of lymphocytes and neutrophilic granulocytes. The cells and tissue grew slowly in PLA. The PLA/BMG materials were wrapped by little connective tissue where there were a few inflammatory cells. The connective tissue ingrowth was observed in the center of PLA/BMG. There was no significant difference in the thickness of fibrous membrane between 2 groups at each time point (P>0.05). The number of inflammatory cells of PLA/BMG group were significantly less than those in PLA group at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (P<0.05); the vascularization area was significantly larger than that in PLA group (P<0.05). ConclusionPLA/BMG composite biomaterials prepared by super critical-CO2 technique are good in cell and tissue biocompatibilty.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effect of injectable composites of calcium sulfate and hyaluronate in enhancing osteogenesis

    ObjectiveTo fabricate an injectable composite bone substitute with hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium sulfate and to evaluate the biocompatibility and effect of the composite on cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation in vitro and osteogenic capability in vivo. MethodsCalcium sulfate powder was mixed with HA solution, cross-linked HA solution, and phosphate buffer solution (PBS) in a ratio of 2∶1 (W/V) to get composites of CA+HA, CA+HAC, and CA. The standard extracts from above 3 materials were prepared according to ISO10993-5, and were used to culture mouse MC3T3-E1 cells. The composite biocompatibility and cell proliferation in different concentrations of extract were tested with cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). The cells were cultured with standard medium as a control. The optimal concentration was selected for osteogenic differentiation test, and ELISA Kit was used to determine the alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen type I (COL-I), and osteocalcin (OCN). The femoral condylar bone defect was made on New Zealand white rabbits and repaired with CA+HA, CA+HAC, and CA. Micro-CT was done to evaluate new bone formation with bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) ratio at 6 and 12 weeks. HE staining was used to observe bone formation. ResultsCA+HA and CA+HAC were better in injectability and stability in PBS than CA. The biocompatibility test showed that absorbance (A) value of CA group was significantly lower than that of control group (P<0.05) at 6, 12, and 24 hours after culture, but no significant difference was found inA values between CA+HA group or CA+HAC group and control group (P>0.05). The proliferation test showed 25% and 50% extract of all 3 materials had significantly higherA value than control group (P<0.05). For 75% and 100% extract, only CA+HA group had significantly higherA value than control group (P<0.05). And 50% extract was selected for osteogenic differentiation test. At 14 and 21 days, ALP, COL-I and OCN concentrations of CA+HA group and CA+HAC group were significantly higher than those of CA group and control group (P<0.05). Micro-CT results showed higher BV/TV in CA+HA group and CA+HAC group than CA group at 6 and 12 weeks (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between CA+HA group and CA+HAC group (P>0.05). HE staining revealed that a little bone tissue was seen in CA+HA group and CA+HAC group, but there was no bone formation in CA group at 6 weeks; more streak bone tissue in CA+HA group and CA+HAC group than CA group at 12 weeks. ConclusionComposites prepared with calcium sulfate and HA or with cross-linked HA are stable, injectable, and biocompatible. The materials have excellent effect on proliferation and differentiation of mouse MC3T3-E1 cells. They also show good osteogenic capability in vivo. So it is a potential bone substitutes for bone defective diseases.

    Release date:2017-06-15 10:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content