west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Bone transport" 5 results
  • Bone Transport and Bone Lengthening in the Treatment of Long Bone Chronic Osteomyelitis and Infectious Bone Nonunion

    ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical efficacy of Ilizarov bone transport and bone lengthening in the treatment of long bone infection and limb shortening, and fracture nonunion caused by infection. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 13 patients with long bone infection, chronic osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia, and infectious bone nonunion, treated with infection focus removal, Ilizarov outer fixation, bone transport and bone lengthening between June 2011 and October 2013. Among the patients, 8 of them had chronic osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia, 4 had infectious bone nonunion, and one had chronic fibula osteomyelitis. ResultsAll the 13 patients had a first-stage healing of the sinus tract and junctions. Among the patients who did the bone transport by themselves after being discharged from hospital, two had nail infections (one was cured after debridement, and the other underwent amputation after re-infection after debridement). One had a re-fracture after the healing of the previous fracture, and was cured by intramedullary nailing. The length of bone transport in these 13 cases ranged from 5 to 13 cm, averaging 7.5 cm. After bone transport, 11 patients had equal length of the lower limbs, and the affected lower limb of the other two patients became shorter than before. No neural function damage occurred in all the patients. ConclusionIlizarov bone transport and lengthening technique is an effective way to treat infections and bone defect of long bone, and it can improve patients' quality of life greatly.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF USING BONE TRANSPORT AND BONE SHORTENING-LENGTHENING FOR TIBIAL BONE AND SOFT TISSUE DEFECTS

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness using bone transport and bone shortening-lengthening by Ilizarov technique for tibial bone and soft tissue defects. MethodsBetween January 2004 and May 2012,31 patients with tibial bone and soft tissue defects were managed by Ilizarov technique,the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.Bone transport was used in 18 cases (group A),and bone shortening-lengthening in 13 cases (group B).There was no significant difference in age,gender,type of fracture,defect location,size of bone and soft defects,and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05).Postoperative complications were observed;Paley's criterion was used to assess the bone healing and function recovery of the limb. ResultsAll the flaps survived and healing of wounds by second intention was obtained in all cases of group A;healing of wounds by first intention was obtained in 1 case,delayed healing in 3 cases,and healing by second intention in 9 cases in group B.All patients were followed up 1.5-4.5 years (mean,2.4 years).Pin loosening or pin tract infection occurred in 15 cases of group A and in 10 cases of group B,and limb length discrepancy in 1 case of group B;there was no significant difference in the rate of complication (χ2=0.003,P=0.955).In the distracted zone,all fractures healed naturally with excellent scale.The healing time was (251±39) days in group A,and was (239±45) days in group B,showing no significant difference (t=0.800,P=0.430);the healing index was (4.26±0.19) d/mm in group A,and was (4.13±0.19) d/mm in group B,showing no significant difference (t=1.775,P=0.086).In the bone defect zone,natural healing was obtained in 12 cases and healing after second operation or bone grafting in 6 cases,with healing time of (341±55) days (excellent in 17 cases and good in 1 case) in group A;natural healing was obtained in 11 cases and healing after second operation or bone grafting in 2 cases,with the healing time of (295±62) days (excellent in 12 cases and good in 1 case) in group B;and there was significant difference in the healing time (t=2.195,P=0.036),but no significant difference in the healing scale (Z=-1.693,P=0.091).At last follow-up,the function recovery was excellent in 7 cases,good in 6 cases,and fair in 5 cases in group A,and was excellent in 3 cases,good in 6 cases,and fair in 4 cases in group B,showing no significant difference (Z=-0.660,P=0.509). ConclusionUsing bone transport or bone shortening-lengthening by Ilizarov technique for tibial bone and soft tissue defects,the overall outcomes are similar,but the healing of bone defect zone is faster when using bone shortening-lengthening.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF IMPROVING AXIAL OFFSET BY USING Ilizarov BONE TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY

    ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of Ilizarov technique in improving bone transport axial offset. MethodsBetween January 2010 and December 2014, 14 patients with tibial fracture were treated by using Ilizarov technique. Of 14 cases, 11 were male and 3 were female, aged 18-70 years (mean, 38.8 years); there were 10 cases of infective bone defect and 4 cases of non-infective bone defect. According to Paley typing, 7 cases were rated as type B1(bone defect without shortening) and 7 cases as type B3(bone defect with shortening). The injury to operation time was 1 to 72 months (mean, 11.9 months). Ilizarov fixation was used for type architecture and adjusting fixed bone removal of half the distance between the needle and the ring, changing the auadrilateral edges, adjusting the convolution relationship between the bone removal section and bone segment involution, and adjusting the two force lines of bone segment involution end so as to make the limb lines of force satisfactory. ResultsThe patients were followed up 9-31 months (mean, 19.1 months). Four cases achieved natural bone healing at last follow-up, bone healing was obtained in 10 cases after bone graft. At 1 week after operation, X-ray films showed angulation in the coronal plane in 10 cases (3-12°, 4.9° on average) and in the sagittal plane in 9 cases (2-12°, 3.8° on average); axial offset was observed in 6 cases (43%), which was corrected in 5 cases except 1 case. At last followup, angulation in the coronal plane was observed in 5 cases (2-4°, 2.6° on average), angulation in the sagittal plane in 6 cases (2-6°, 4.1° on average), and axial offset in 1 case (7%), which were significantly improved when compared with ones at 1 week. According to Paley evaluation criteria, the osseous results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 2 cases; the functional results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 2 cases at last follow-up. ConclusionAxial offset in the Ilizarov bone transport relatively common. By adjusting fixed bone removal of half the distance between the needle and the ring, the axial offset can be improved.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • SIMULTANEOUS REPAIR OF TIBIA BONE DEFECT AND REFRACTORY SOFT TISSUE DEFECT BY BONE TRANSPORT TECHNIQUE

    ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and effectiveness of bone transport technique for simultaneous repair of tibia defect and refractory soft tissue defect. MethodsThirty-five patients with tibia bone defect combined with refractory soft tissue defect were treated between January 2010 and December 2014, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 21 males and 14 females with an average age of 29 years (range, 18-47 years). All patients had Gustilo type Ⅲ open tibial fractures, which were caused by traffic accident. Fracture located at the upper 1/3 of the tibia in 1 case, at the middle 1/3 of the tibia in 19 cases, and at the lower 1/3 of the tibia in 15 cases. All patients underwent external fixation after 4-10 hours of trauma, and tibial skin necrosis, infection, and purulent exudation were observed after 5-10 days of operation. The time from injury to admission was 21 days to 5 months (mean, 2 months). After debridement, the average length of tibia defect was 8 cm (range, 6-11 cm); the area of soft tissue defect was 6 cm×5 cm to 10 cm×8 cm. Orthofix external fixation was applied to tract the bone and soft. ResultsAll 35 patients were followed up 12-22 months (mean, 16 months). The average time of bony healing was 15 months (range, 9-20 months), and no obvious force line offset was found. Osteotomy segment was extended from 6 to 11 cm (mean, 8 cm); after treatment, the external fixation support was retained for 2 to 10 months (mean, 5 months). No blood vessel and nerve injuries were found during treatment, and no osteomyelitis and refracture happened after operation. The skin and soft tissue defects healed, and the healing time was 1 to 3 months (mean, 1.3 months). Different degrees of infection occurred in 5 cases, and was cured after dressing change. According to Johner-Wruhs' evaluation criteria after external fixator was removed, the results were excellent in 26 cases, good in 5 cases, and moderate in 4 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 88.6%. ConclusionBone transport technique can simultaneously repair tibia bone defect and soft tissue defect by continuous bone and soft tissue traction.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of bone transport with a locking plate versus conventional bone transport for tibial defects

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness difference between bone transport with a locking plate (BTLP) and conventional bone transport with Ilizarov/Orthofix fixators in treatment of tibial defect. MethodsThe clinical data of 60 patients with tibial fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and patients were treated with BTLP (BTLP group, n=20), Ilizarov fixator (Ilizarov group, n=23), or Orthofix fixator (Orthofix group, n=17) for bone transport. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to admission, length of bone defect, tibial fracture typing, and comorbidities between groups (P>0.05). The osteotomy time, the retention time of external fixator, the external fixation index, and the occurrence of postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups. The bone healing and functional recovery were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Results All patients of 3 groups were followed up 13-45 months, with a mean of 20.4 months. The osteotomy time was significantly shorter in the BTLP group than in the Ilizarov group, and the retention time of external fixator and the external fixation index were significantly lower in the BTLP group than in the Ilizarov and Orthofix groups (P<0.05). Twenty-two fractures healed in the Ilizarov group and 1 case of delayed healing; 16 fractures healed in the Orthofix group and 1 case of delayed healing; 18 fractures healed in the BTLP group and 2 cases of delayed healing. There was no significant difference between groups in fracture healing distribution (P=0.824). After completing bone reconstruction treatment according to ASAMI criteria, the BTLP group had better bone healing than the Orthofix group and better function than the Ilizarov groups, showing significant differences (P<0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 4 cases (20%) in the BLTP group, 18 cases (78%) in the Ilizarov group, and 12 cases (70%) in the Orthofix group. The incidence of complication in the BTLP group was significantly lower than that in other groups (P<0.05). Conclusion BTLP is safe and effective in the treatment of tibial defects. BTLP has apparent advantages over the conventional bone transport technique in osteotomy time, external fixation index, and lower limb functional recovery.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content