The treatmen t of the bone defect of the distal part of the radiu s included repair of the bone defect and resto rat ion of the funct ion of the w rist jo in t. Since 1979, th ree operat ive methods w ere u sed to t reat 13 cases, and they w ere graf t ing of the vascu larized f ibu la by anastom rsis f ibu lar vessels, graf t ing of upper part of f ibu lar w ith lateral inferio rgen icu lar artery and graf t ing vascu larized scapu la f lap. Follow up had been carried ou t from1 to 10 years. The resu lt w as sat isfacto ry. The discu ssion included the repair of the defect of the m iddle o r distal part of the radiu s, the operat ive methods, main at ten t ion s and indications. It was considered that it shou ld be based on the length of bone defect wh ile the operative method was considered.
Objective To analyze the causes and the reoperation therapies after salvage limb surgery with prosthesis for bone tumors. Methods The retrospective analysis was performed on 85 patients undergoing the limb salvage operation with prosthetic replacement for tumors from January 1994 to December 2004. Ofthe patients, 21 (13 males and 8 females, aged 18-58 years) underwent reoperations for various reasons. All the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed(10 patients with osteosarcoma, 4 with chondrosarcoma, 5 with giant cell tumor of the bone, 2 with osteofibrosarcoma). The distal femur was involved in 9 patients, proximal tibia in 8, proximal femur in 2, proximal humerus in 1, and acetabulum in 1. According to the Enneking surgical grading system, there were 5 patients in ⅠB and 16 in ⅡB. The time between the first operation and the reoperation was 2 weeks to 20 years. The common reasons for the reoperation were tumor recurrence in 8 patients, prosthetic loosening in 5, no healing of the incision in4,joint dislocation in 3, and implant fracture in 1. The amputation and the prosthesis revision were respectively performed on 6 patients, extensive resection ofthe tumor on 3, the myo-skin flap translocation on 4, internal hemipelvectomy without reconstruction on 1, and open reduction on 1.Results The follow-up in18 patients for 1-5 years (average, 3 years and 4 months) revealed that 4 patients died of osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis. The other 14 patients had no tumor recurrence or loosening of the prosthesis, and the incisions healed well. The assessment on the joint function was performed on 13 of the 18 patients and the results were as follows: excellent in 2 patients, good in 5, fair in 4, and poor in 2, with a satisfaction rate of the reoperation with limb salvage of 84.6%and an excellent-good rate of 53.8%. Conclusion Tumor recurrence is the most common reason for the reoperation after the limb salvage with prosthesis for tumors, and loosening of the prosthesis is an important reason, too. By therules of the bone tumor limb savage, the limb salvage operations can also beperformed, which can achieve a satisfactory result of the limb function.
From 1972 to 1990,121 cases of bone tumor were treated by segmental resection of tumor and followed by artifical joint re- placement. All of the prostheses were designed and manufactured by our hospital. One hundred and two cases were followed up for an average of 7.4 years and the curative rate with the affected limbs preserved was 85.28%. The indication, the advantages and disadvantages, the material and the type of artifical joints, and the assessment of functional reconstruction following operation were discussed.
Objective To study the operative effect and complication of the prosthesis replacement of the proximal humerus with malignant tumor. Methods From October 1998 to August 2003, the prosthesis replacement was performed to treat the proximal femur with malignant tumor in 4 patients, including 2 patients with osteosarcoma (Enneking staging,ⅡA) and 2 patients with giancell tumor of the bone (ⅡA,ⅡB). By the International Society of Limb Salvage(ISOLS) criterion, the 2 cases of osteosarcoma were preoperatively scored as 4 and 5 points, and 2 cases of giant cell tumor of the bone were scored as 9 and 11 points. The patients’ psychological conditions as well as their limb pain, shape, locality, activity, and function werealso observed. Results The follow-up for 24-58 months (mean, 44 months) showed that there was no local recurrence or infection in all the patients except onepatient who had the loosening of the screws for the fixation 17 months after operation and had no treatment. After operation, all the patients had a better postoperative extention angle from 22° to 41°(mean, 25°), bending angle from 29° to 80°（mean, 35°）, abduction angle from 5° to 28°, and circumgyrate angle from 15° to 22° in their shoulder joints. However, the shoulder joint function was still unstable to some extent and the joints had a decreased strength. By the criterion formulated by the ISOLS, the postoperative score for assessing the 2 patientswith osteosarcoma was increased by 16 points when compared with the preoperative score; the score for the 2 patients with giant cell tumor of the bone was increased by 9.5 points.Conclusion The prosthesis replacement to treat the malignant tumor of the proximal humerus is the good method of choice and has a good therapeutic result; however, there are more complications and so the method should be cautiously employed in the clinical practice.
Objective To compare the long-term results of vascularised fibulargraft and simple autologous fibular graft for reconstruction of wrist after distal bone tumor resection.Methods From January 1979 to September2002, 15 patients with wrist defects due to distal bone tumor resection were treated with vascularised fibular graft or simple autologous fibular graft and followed up 1 year. The results were graded with Enneking’s system and evaluated radiographicallyaccording to the “International Symposium on Limb Salvage”. The grade system included limb function, radiological examination and the function of ankle. Results The limb function of 8 patients with vascularised fibular graft restored to 80% of normal function and the bone union was achieved within 6 months. The limbfunction of 6 patients with simple autologous fibular graft restored to 67% of normal function. The bony union was achieved within 6 months in 4 cases with thebone graft less than 5 cm and in the 13th and 16th months in 2 cases with the bone graft more than 12 cm. Conclusion It is suitable to use the headof fibular boneas a substitute for the distal radius. The healing of vascularised fibular graft is very quick and haven’t the bone resorption. So in the procedure for reconstruction and limb salvage after bone tumor resection of distal radius, the free vascularised fibular graft with fibular head is an ideal substitute.
In order to restore the function of shoulder joint in patient with tumor of upper end of humerus, artificial humeral head replacement was performed. The materials included resinene, nylon-6 and large molecular polyethylene from 1978 to 1993, 14 patients were treated. The tumors involved in this group were giant cell tumor, synviosarcoma, bone cyst, osteochondroma, osteoblastoma, osteofibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, parosteosarcoma and malignant giant cell tumor. After resection of the tumor, the artificial prosthesis was implanted with bone cement. After 1 to 16 years follow-up, functions of the shoulder joint were reserved in 86% of the patients.
OBJECTIVE To manufacture adriamycin-porous tricalcium phosphate (A-PTCP) ceramic drug delivery system (DDS) as a possible method for bone defect treatment after bone tumor operation. METHODS A-PTCP DDS was made from putting adriamycin into PTCP. Thirty rabbits were divided randomly into group A(24 rabbits) and group B(6 rabbits). A-PTCP was implanted in the greater trochanter of the right femur in group A. Adriamycin were injected into veins in group B. Muscle around A-PTCP and plasma were taken out at different period. Adriamycin concentrations in muscle and plasma were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS A-PTCP could gradually release adriamycin over 10 weeks. Adriamycin concentrations in the muscle were higher than that in plasma. CONCLUSION A-PTCP may be a new method for repairing bone defects after bone tumor operation.
Objective To evaluate the shortterm efficacy of osteoarticular allografts in the limb salvage of the proximal tibia. Methods From 1998 to 2003, 15 patients (7 males, 8 females; aged 14-56 yr, average 33) with bone tumor of the proximal tibia underwent osteoarticular allografts, among whom 7 had progressive giant cell tumor without any previous chemotherapy; 8 had malignant tumor with previous chemotherapy, including 6 patients with osteosarocoma, 1 with spindle cell sarcoma, and 1 with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. According to the Enneking system, the patients were classified into ⅠB (7 patients), ⅡA (2 patients), and ⅡB (6 patients). All the patientsunderwent the marginal resection with an allograft (average length 12 cm, range6-16 cm) implanted. Results The follow-up for an average of 21 months (range,3-58 months) revealed that among the 8 patients with malignant tumor of the proximal tibia undergoing chemotherapy, 5 had union of the bone, 3 had no union of the bone; among the 3 patients, 2 had a complication of infection and 1 had a local recurrence. All the 3 patients underwent amputation at the lower part of the femur. According to the Mankin score, 2 patients had a perfect result, 2 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor, with a 50% effectiveness rate. Among the 7 patients with progressive giant cell tumor at the upper part of the tibia, none had infection or local recurrence, but 2 hadnonunion of the bone and 2 had joint instability, aided by the kneeaidingsystem. According to the Mankin score, 3 patients had a perfect result, 2 good,and 2 fair, with a 71% effectiveness rate. Conclusion The osteoarticular allograft of the proximal tibia has many advantages in spite of a relatively highrate of complications, and it is the limb salvage of choicefor the progressivebenign or malignant bone tumors of the proximal tibia.
Chitosan is a kind of biological material with good histocompatibility and gradual biodegradability in vivo. It has no toxicity or side-effect. For its gradual degradation, chitosan and adriamycin were mixed and formed drug delivery system (DDS). The release test of DDS and exudant of DDS in inhibiting OS-116 were examined in vitro. The results were as following: the DDS could release adriamycin in slow and stable way. The SO-116 inhidition rate of the exudant of the DDS on the 1st, 20th, 40th and 60th day was 58.11%, 36.48%, 24.32% and 21.62% respectively. It was concluded that the drug delivery system was a slow release system. It could maintain the concentration of adriamycin in a certain level. It was also suggested that the chitosan was a good carrier for slow release of chemotherapeutic drug in local therapy for postoperative treatment of bone tumor.
Objective To discuss the reconstructive method of the bone defect after resection of the upper extremity bone tumor and to assess the outcome of the autograft to reconstruct the bone defect after the bone tumor resection. Methods From August 1998 to March 2004,16 patients aged 7~45 years suffering from bone tumor of the upper extremity were treated with the wide resection of the bone tumor and the reconstruction of the bone defect by the autograft. The following diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination:Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma of theproximal humerus in 1 patient each; Ewing’s sarcoma of the distal humerus in 2 patients;giant cell tumor in 8 patients, highgrade chondrosarcoma in 2, malignant fibrohistiocytoma in 1; and osteosarcoma in 1 of the distal radius. Substitution of the proximal humerus with the clavicle was performed in 2 patients, andthedistal humerus with the fibula in other 2 patients. Of the 12 patients with tumor in the distal radius, 1 was reconstructed with autograft of the iliac bone and 11 with autograft with the fibula. The functional outcome was evaluated by the MSTS score. Results The follow-up for 36 and 12 months respectively revealed that in the 2 patients undergoing the autograft with the clavicle in the proximal humerus, good shoulder functions of flexion and extension were obtained although the function of abduction was poor, with the MSTS scores of 23 and 22 respectively. In the 2 patients undergoing the autograft with the fibular in the distal humerus, good elbow function and bone union were observed according to the followup for 3 and 4 months respectively, with the MSTS scores of 24 and 19 respectively. Of the 12 patients undergoing the autograft in the distal radius, 11 had an excellent or good function with no complication, with the average MSTS score of 22.6 (ranging from 18 to 27), accordingto the follow-up for 6-75 months; only 1 had no bone union 10 months after operation and lost the follow-up afterwards. Conclusion Reconstruction ofthe bone defect with the autograft after the wide resection of the upper extremity bone tumor is an ideal and reliable method for some suitable patients, especially for some children.