ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical value of multi-slice CT in the diagnosis of complications due to breast augmentation. MethodsWe collected the imaging data of 32 female patients who accepted multi-slice CT examination in the second People's Hospital of Chengdu after breast augmentation between February 2010 and February 2015. The position, shape, edge, internal density, leakage, rupture and hard nodules of the prosthesis were observed and analyzed carefully. ResultsIn the 32 patients with breast augmentation, 12 were normal with bilateral symmetry and without abnormal shape or density. Among the other 20 patients, 11 had capsular contracture, 5 had prosthesis leakage, rupture and hard nodules, 4 had breast infection, 1 had fibroadenoma, 1 had cystoma, and 5 had little calcified nodules in the breast tissue. ConclusionThe multi-slice CT scan can clearly and accurately show the position, shape and size of the breast prosthesis as well as the existence of leakage, rupture and hard nodules in the prosthesis. It plays a very important role in the diagnosis of the complications due to breast augmentation and can be effective guidance for clinical operation.
ObjectiveTo explore the techniques and short-term effectivness of contralateral breast symmetrization mammaplasty in breast reconstruction. MethodsBetween February 2014 and December 2015, 11 patients received immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (6 and 5 cases respectively) for contralateral breast symmetrization mammaplasty. The age ranged 36-55 years (mean, 45 years). The disease duration was from 7 days to 6 months (mean, 2.5 months) in 6 patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. According to tumor TNM staging, 2 cases were rated as TisN0M0, 3 cases as T1N0M0, and 1 case as T2N0M0. The duration was from 2 to 25 years (mean, 8 years) in 5 patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction. The implant (7 cases) and latissimus dorsi (4 cases) were used for breast reconstruction; and breast augmentation (6 cases) and breast reduction (5 cases) were performed for contralateral breast symmetrization. ResultsOne patient had local poor wound healing postoperatively and was cured; primary healing was obtained in the other patients, and no other postoperative complication of infection, implant exposure or capsular contracture was found. The patients were followed up 3 to 24 months (mean, 12 months). The reconstructive outcomes were excellent in 9 cases and good in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. There was no recurrence or metastasis. ConclusionSimultaneous contralateral symmetrization with augmentation/reduction mammaplasty after breast reconstruction can obtain satisfactory symmetric outcomes.
Objective To explore the risk factors related to periprosthetic infection after breast augmentation, and to provide a basis for reducing the risk of postoperative infection. Methods A total of 1 056 female patients who underwent breast augmentation between January 2010 and January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were 20 to 44 years old (mean, 31.6 years). The body mass index (BMI) was 19.0-31.1 kg/m2, with an average of 24.47 kg/m2. According to the periprosthetic infection standard of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the patients were divided into infection group and non-infection group. Age, BMI, diabetes, previous history of immunosuppression, history of smoking, previous history of breast surgery, previous history of mastitis, combined with active dermatitis, surgical approach, the type and shape of breast prosthesis, implant in the different layers, combined with mastopexy, operation time, postoperative antibiotic time, postoperative breast crash, and postoperative potential infection surgery were analyzed by univariate analysis. The influencing factors of prosthetic infection were screened by logistic regression. Results Periprosthetic infection occurred in 60 cases after operation, and the infection rate was 5.68%. Among them, 11 cases were acute infection, 33 cases were subacute infection, 16 cases were delayed infection, and 20 cases were positive in bacterial culture. Postoperative breast crash occurred in 114 cases. Univariate analysis showed that diabetes, previous history of immunosuppression, history of smoking, previous history of mastitis, postoperative breast crash, postoperative potential infection surgery, and combined with breast suspension were the influencing factors of postoperative periprosthetic infection (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes, history of smoking, and postoperative breast crash were the risk factors of periprosthetic infection (P<0.05). Conclusion Diabetes, smoking, and postoperative breast crash are the risk factors of periprosthetic infection after breast augmentation.