Objective To retrospectively analyze the emergency complications of the patients after oocyte retrieval with assisted reproductive technology (ART), and analyze the corresponding strategies. Methods The clinical data of patients after oocyte retrieval with ART between January and December 2016 were retrospectively anayzed. The postoperative emergency complications were observed. Results A total of 5 013 patients were included in the study. The common emergency complications after oocyte retrieval included vaginal bleeding in 137 cases (2.73%) , ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in 35 (0.69%), hematuria caused by bladder injury in 11 cases (0.21%), pelvic infection in 3 (0.06%), and vagal reflex in 2 (0.04%). OHSS was related to age, the number of basal follicles, the number of oviposaccharides and the estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection, but not related to the body mass index and the number of days of gonadotropin use; which might be misdiagnosed most likely. Conclusions OHSS is one of the common and severe emergency complications after oocyte retrieval with ART, which should be concerned. Active treatment of complications is helpful to reduce the incidence of emergency complications after oocyte retrieval with ART.
ObjectiveTo explore the associations between estrogen receptor α (ESR1) gene intron 1 PvuⅡ (−397 T/C, rs2334693), XbaⅠ (−351 A/G, rs9340799) polymorphisms and premature ovarian failure (POF).MethodsLiterature published before February 2021 were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and CQVIP databases, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed before. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for data analysis, the Q test and I2 statistic were used for heterogeneity analysis. Random-effect model or fixed-effect model was used according to I2 value. All analyses were performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSix case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. For the associations between ESR1 gene intron 1 PvuⅡ polymorphisms and POF, there was no statistical difference in TT vs. CC model [OR=0.72, 95%CI (0.31, 1.70), P=0.46], TC vs. CC model [OR=1.09, 95%CI (0.83, 1.43), P=0.54], recessive model [OR=1.08, 95%CI (0.68, 1.70), P=0.74], or dominant model [OR=0.77, 95%CI (0.42, 1.42), P=0.41]. For the associations between ESR1 gene intron 1 XbaⅠ polymorphisms and POF, there was no statistical difference in AA vs. GG model [OR=0.88, 95%CI (0.44, 1.75), P=0.72], AG vs. GG model [OR=1.23, 95%CI (0.84, 1.79), P=0.29], recessive model [OR=1.14, 95%CI (0.81, 1.61), P=0.44], or dominant model [OR=0.75, 95%CI (0.41, 1.35), P=0.34], either. No statistical difference was found in the ethno-based subgroup analyses (P>0.05). Most models had obvious heterogeneities.ConclusionsCurrent evidence can’t confirm the associations between ESR1 gene PvuⅡ, XbaⅠ polymorphisms and POF. High-quality, multi-central and large-sample studies are still necessary to support this conclusion.