ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of correlation between pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus.MethodsRecent studies on the association between pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus were extensively reviewed, and relevant research results on the association between pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus were reviewed.ResultsPancreatic cancer had a particular association with diabetes. Patients with pancreatic cancer may develop new diabetes or worsen existing diabetes mellitus. About 50% of patients with pancreatic cancer had diabetes mellitus before diagnosis, suggesting a “dual causal relationship” between pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus. Long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was one of the high risk factors for the occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer. T2DM may also increase the risk of pancreatic cancer due to hyperinsulinemia, adipokine, and other factors. Pancreatic cancer was one of the cause of diabetes mellitus at the same time, but its mechanism was not yet known, also needed to get a lot of information to understand the impact of long-term diabetes mellitus on the development of pancreatic cancer, as well as the reason of pancreatic cancer related to diabetes mellitus mechanism.ConclusionThe clear relationship between pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus has not been proved, and further research is needed to clarify the relationship between them.
Objective To discuss the methods of producing experimental models of chronic pancreatitis and their individual properties. Methods The recent literatures about experimental models of chronic pancreatitis were reviewed and analyzed. Methods of producing experimental models and their individual properties were summarized, and best models suitable for varied chronic pancreatitis were afforded. Results Diet, ligation of pancreatic duct, caerulein, dibutyltin dichloride (DBTC), arterial ligation, injecting microspheres into artery, and injection of pancreatic duct could induce different experimental models of chronic pancreatitis. Spontaneous chronic pancreatitis was induced by diet, chronic obstructive pancreatitis produced by ligation and injection of pancreatic duct, chronic relapsing pancreatitis evoked by caerulein, and chronic active pancreatitis made by arterial ligation and injecting microspheres into artery.Conclusion Different methods could induce models of chronic pancreatitis, which had their individual properties.
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.
ObjectiveTo investigate the guiding value of preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathology in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN).MethodsThe clinical data of 205 patients with PCN diagnosed by pathology from July 14, 2003 to July 31, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rate and misdiagnosis rate of PCN by preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathology were analyzed.ResultsThe most commonly used preoperative imaging methods were ultrasound and CT, in 146 cases (82.95%) and 141 cases (80.11%), respectively. There were 54 cases (30.68%) with MRI. Of them, 47 cases were examined by single examination, 129 cases received combined examination, of which 123 cases (95.35%) were examined by ultrasound combined with CT. The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rate of PCN by ultrasound, CT, and MRI were 81.51% (119/146), 81.56% (115/141), and 87.04% (47/54), respectively. Comparison of ultrasound with CT and MRI showed statistical significance (χ2=47.747, P<0.001; χ2=11.873, P=0.018), but no significant difference was observed between CT and MRI (χ2=5.012, P>0.05). In 27 cases of false diagnosis by ultrasound, no obvious abnormality was found in 14 cases (51.85%), followed by misdiagnosis as pancreatic pseudocyst (11 cases, 40.74%). Of the 26 cases misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer by CT, 57.69% (15 cases) were misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer; 7 cases were misdiagnosed by MRI, 42.86% (3 cases) of patients were misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer and pancreatic pseudocyst. Thirty-one cases were misdiagnosed by intraoperative rapid pathology, and most of them misdiagnosed as pancreatic pseudocyst (10 cases, 32.26%). The next was SPN misdiagnosed as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (7 cases, 22.58%). The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rates of PCN were 81.58% (124/152), 86.84% (132/152), and 97.37% (148/152) in preoperative imaging, intraoperative rapid pathology, and preoperative imaging combined with intraoperative rapid pathology, while the misdiagnostic rates were 18.42% (28/152), 13.16% (20/152), and 2.63% (4/152), respectively.ConclusionsIn preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathological examination, it is possible that ultrasound could not find PCN lesions. CT and MRI are most likely to be misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative rapid pathological examination misdiagnosed as pancreatic pseudocyst is most common. Perfect preoperative imaging and rapid intraoperative pathology can improve the correct diagnosis rate of PCN and avoid unreasonable surgical intervention measures.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) for postoperative complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).MethodsThe clinical data of 134 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively collected, including general conditions and postoperative complications. The predictive value of CAR was calculated.ResultsOf the 134 patients, 38 patients suffered from postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), 32 patients suffered from abdominal infection, 5 patients suffered from biliary fistula, 63 patients suffered from delayed gastric emptying (DGE), 13 patients suffered from post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), 8 patients suffered from wound infection, and 1 patient suffered from chyle leakage. There was no significant difference in general conditions such as gender, age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumor nature, tumor diameter, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, diabetes history, jaundice history, and drinking history (P>0.05), but the hospital stay in the complication group was longer than that of the non-complication group (P<0.05). The value of CAR in the pancreatic fistula and abdominal infection group were significantly higher than those in the non-complication group at 1 d, 3 d and 5 d (exclude 1 day after surgery on POPF), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). On the 3rd day after surgery, the sensitivity of CAR predicting POPF was 79.95%, the specificity was 86.46%; the sensitivity of predicting abdominal infection was 75.00%, the specificity was 81.37%, and the result was better than using procalcitonin (PCT) alone, but similar with C-reactive protein (CRP) alone or CRP+PCT.ConclusionPostoperative CAR can better predict POPF and abdominal infection after PD, and the effect is better than PCT alone.
Objective To summarize the experience of single center for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer who underwent RAMPS surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Results All operations of the 52 patients were successfully completed, with no death during hospitalization and 30 days after surgery. The operative time was (463±137) min (198–830 min), the median of intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (100–2 800 mL), of which 19 cases (36.5%) received intraoperative blood transfusion. The median of hospital stay was 19.5 days (7–58 days). After operation, 18 patients suffered from pancreatic fistula, 5 patients suffered from delay gastric emptying, 7 patients suffered from peritoneal effusion, 3 patients suffered from pleural effusion, 4 patients suffered from abdominal infection, 2 patients suffered from abdominal bleeding. Reoperations were performed in 2 patients. There were 51 patients were followed up for 3–35 months (the median of 18 months) with the median survival time were 16.2 months. During the follow-up period, 21 patients suffered from recurrence or metastasis, of which 8 patients died. The results of Cox partial hazard model showed that, surgical margin ［RR=3.65, 95% CI was (0.06, 5.11), P=0.026］ and adjuvant therapy ［RR=6.43, 95% CI was (1.51, 27.43), P=0.012］ were statistically related with prognosis, the prognosis of patients with negative surgical margin and underwent adjuvant therapy were better than those patients with positive surgical margin and didn’t underwent adjuvant therapy. Conclusions RAMPS is safe and feasible in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer, and it may improve the R0 resection rate. RAMPS combins with adjuvant therapy can contribute to better prognosis.
Objective To analyze characteristics of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of pancreas and to discuss it’s diagnosis and treatment. Methods The clinicopathologic data of 39 patients with pathologically diagnosed as SPN from January 2012 to July 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital to Xinjiang Medical University were collected, the clinical characteristics, imaging features, diagnosis and treatment methods, and prognosis were analyzed. Results Among the 39 patients, there were 27 benign SPNs and 12 malignant SPNs. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, blood type, clinical manifestations, distribution of tumor sites, morphological features, and proportions of combined calcification, intracapsular hemorrhage, and pancreatic ductal dilatation between the benign and malignant SPN patients (P>0.050). The maximum diameter of the tumor, the integrity of the capsule, and the ratio of the tumor cystic solidity had significant differences (P<0.050) between the benign and malignant SPN patients. That was, in patients with benign SPN, the largest tumor diameter was less than or equal to 5 cm, and the capsule was complete, and the tumor was mainly cystic and solid. Of the 27 patients with benign SPN, 6 underwent the tumor enucleation, 7 underwent the standard pancreatoduodenectomy, 2 underwent the middle pancreas resection, 5 underwent the standard caudal pancreatectomy, and 7 underwent the spleen-preserving caudal pancreatectomy. Of the 12 patients with malignant SPN, 8 underwent the standard pancreatoduodenectomy and 4 underwent the standard caudal pancreatectomy. All the patients were discharged after surgery and no intra-abdominal infection occurred. The pancreatic leakage occurred in 4 patients and recoved after the full drainage. The average follow-up was 24.5 months, no patient had the tumor metastasis or recurrence, and no patient died. Conclusions Incomplete capsule and the largest diameter >5 cm may suggest malignancy of SPN, and near-solid tumors may be indicative of benignancy. Surgery is a crucial and most effective treatment for SPN, and it is suggested that routine radical operation is performed for malignant SPN.
ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the long-term clinical effect of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 102 patients who underwent DPPHR (n=35) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=67) from January 2014 to December 2019 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe operations of patients in the DPPHR group and the PD group were successfully complete, no one died during operation or perioperative period. The weight gain in one year after operation and incidences of exocrine dysfunction in the DPPHR group were all better than those of the PD group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on the other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain score, diarrhea score, and the overall health status score in one year after operation significantly improved in the DPPHR group than those in the PD group (P<0.05).ConclusionDPPHR is more beneficial to improve the quality of life after operation, and is a better surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant diseases of pancreatic head.
ObjectiveTo investigate whether transplantation of islet cells combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSCs) of the pancreatic subcapsular promoting revascularization of pancreatic islets in rats, so as to reduce the loss of islet cells after transplantation and improve the success rate of islet cell transplantation. MethodsThe model of diabetic rat was established. The BMSCs and islet cells were cultured and identified, then the simple islet cells, simple BMSCs, and combination of islet cells and BMSCs were injected into the pancreatic subcapsular of the islet cell group, BMSCs group, and combination group, respectively. In addition, the same amount of normal saline was injected into the same site as the control group. There were 10 rats in each group. The changes of blood glucose and serum insulin in different time point were detected in each group. The mRNA expressions of angiogenesis factors such as hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), stromal cell derived factor 1α (SDF1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) were determined by real-time quantitative PCR. Results① The blood glucose levels of the islet cell group and combination group were lower than those of the control group and the BMSCs group within 15 d after surgery (P<0.05) and decreased to the normal level, which of the combination group could still maintain the normal level until on day 29 (P<0.05), but which of the islet cell group began to increase on day 15 after surgery and was similar to that in the BMSCs group (P>0.05). ② Compared with the control group and the BMSCs group, the insulin levels were higher in the islet cell group and combination group on day 1, 3, 7, 15, and 29 after surgery (P<0.05), especially in the combination group. ③ The expression levels of HIF-1α, SDF1α, VEGF, and FGF2 mRNAs in the combination group were higher than those the other three groups, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionsIslet cell transplantation of pancreatic subcapsular could decrease blood glucose level in diabetic rats. Hypoglycemic effect of single islet cell transplantation gradually weakens on day 15 d after surgery. After BMSCs combined with islet cells transplantation, the glycemic effect of rat is stable for a longer time. Expressions of angiogenesis factors of BMSCs combined with islet cells transplantation rat are high, which combined with pathological sections suggests that BMSCs could promote vascular recanalization of islet transplantation.