Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization and thrombolysis on acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Methods The treatment and therapeutic efficacy of 7 cases of acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization and thrombolysis under ultrasound guidance from August 2005 to April 2009 were analyzed. Results All the patients succeeded in portal vein catheterization and no bile leakage or abdominal bleeding occurred during the procedure. The clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension， and passing bloody stool relieved were relieved and liquid diet began at postoperative of day 2-5. Emergency operation was done in one case and there was no intestinal fistula. The angiography after the operation showed that the majority of thrombosis were cleared and the blood of portal vein and superior mesenteric vein flowed smoothly. During the follow-up of 3 months to 3 years, all the patients’ status maintained well and no recurrence occurred. Conclusion Treatment of acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis by percutaneous transhepatic portal vein thrombolysis is safe and effective.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary closure (PC) and T-tube drainage (TD) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods The randomized controlled trials of PC and TD after LCBDE were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 2015. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using ReviewerManager 5.2 software. Results Both of the two groups had no postoperative deaths within 30 days. The operative time and hospital stay of PC gourp were shorter than TD group statistically〔OR=–24.76, 95CI (–29.21, –20.31),P<0.000 01〕and〔OR=–2.68, 95%CI (–3.69, –1.67),P<0.000 01〕. The reoperative rate of PC group was lower than that of TD group, and the difference was statistically significant〔OR=0.20, 95%CI (0.05, 0.81),P=0.02〕. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of postoperative severe complications〔OR=0.54, 95%CI (0.26, 1.12),P=0.10〕. Conclusions Compared with the TD group, the operative time and hospitalization time are shorer in PC group, and complication rate is similar, but the cost of treatment of the TD group is higher than PC group, so after LCBDE a primary closure of common bile duct is safe and effective method.
Objective To study the efficacy and safety of combined anti-tuberculosis regimen containing bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Methods A total of 69 MDR-TB patients treated by joint regimen combined bedaquiline with other anti-tuberculosis drugs between March 2018 and August 2019 in Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu were taken as the trial group, and 60 MDR-TB patients received treatment without bedaquiline between June 2016 and December 2017 in the same hospital were taken as the control group. The efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared. Results The 69 patients in the trial group included 44 males and 25 females, aged from 21 to 63 years, with an average of (34.6±11.0) years; 58 patients (84.1%) completed the 24-week treatment with bedaquiline, while 11 patients did not complete the treatment, including 3 deaths (4.3%), 1 loss of follow-up (1.4%), 1 withdrawal from the study (1.4%), and 6 discontinuation due to adverse events (8.7%). Among the 54 patients with positive results of tuberculosis on baseline sputum culture, 49 transformed to negative results within 24 weeks of treatment (the negative conversion rate was 90.7%), and the median negative conversion time was 13.0 weeks. The 60 patients in the control group included 45 males and 15 females, aged from 16 to 66 years, with an average of (35.5±13.2) years. Among the 53 patients with positive results of tuberculosis on baseline sputum culture, 30 transformed to negative results within 24 weeks of treatment (the negative conversion rate was 56.6%), and the median negative conversion time was 12.0 weeks. The negative conversion rate of sputum bacteria in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=16.133, P<0.001). The most common adverse reactions in the trial group were liver function abnormalities (42 cases, 60.9%), prolonged QTc interval (37 cases, 53.6%), electrolyte disturbances (20 cases, 29.0%), and blood system damage (20 cases, 29.0%). In the 37 patients who experienced prolonged QTc interval, there were 8 patients with QTc intervals≥500 ms and 29 patients with QTc intervals ≥450 ms and <500 ms, with a median occurrence time of 16.0 weeks, among whom 25 patients experienced prolonged QTc interval in 4-48 weeks after the withdrawal of bedaquiline. Conclusion The negative conversion rate of tuberculosis sputum culture of patients with MDR-TB treated by bedaquiline combined with other anti- tuberculosis drugs is high, but electrocardiogram should be closely monitored during and after the treatment in order to guard against the potential cardiac toxic effects of bedaquiline.