ObjectiveTo review the progress of percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension as well as the inadequacy, and to reevaluate the clinical significance of the technology. MethodsDomestic and foreign literatures were collected to summary the progress of percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in treatment of resistant hypertension. ResultsThe percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in the treatment of resistant hypertension had obtained some positive results recently, but the long-term outcomes and safety of the technology were still subjected to further evaluation. ConclusionThe effect of percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension remains to be controversial, and both the equipment and technology of radiofrequency catheter-based ablation need to be improved.
ObjectiveTo summarize the etiology and prevention measures of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and discuss the complications and prognosis of it performed surgery and endovascular treatment. MethodsThe process and experience of diagnosis and treatment of two patients with carotid pseudoaneurysm following CEA admitted in this hospital from January 2000 to March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The related English literatures concerning carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA in PubMed, SpringerLink, ELSEVIER, and ScienceDirect database were searched and then made a conclusion. Results①The incidence of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following CEA in this hospital was 0.31% (2/641). These two patients were treated with surgery and endovascular therapy respectively, and both recovered well after the treatment.②Thirty-nine related literatures totally were collected, including 187 patients with carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. One hundred and forty patients were treated with artificial patches during CEA, and 36 patients suffered secondary infection in the surgical sites. One hundred and fifty-two patients were treated with surgery, while 33 patients were treated with endovascular therapy, the residual two patients were accepted hybrid surgery. The overall incidence of cranial nerve injuries, the incidence of 30-day stroke, and the incidence of 30-day mortality were 6.4% (9/141), 7.4% (12/163), and 2.7% (5/182), respectively. ConclusionsSurgical site infection is one of the important reasons which lead to carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA. Aneurysm resection and carotid artery reconstruction is still the main treatment of the carotid artery pseudoaneurysm; endovascular therapy could be used as a choice for a part of the patients. How to reduce the perioperative cranial nerve damage and the incidence of complications such as stroke still need further to be studied.