Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of capecitabine plus docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer where anthracycline has failed as a treatment. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (2008, issue 4), and CBM to Sept. 2008. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs about capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer were identified. Study selection and analyses were undertaken according to the Cochrane Handbook, and RevMan 5.0 was applied for statistical analyses. The following was studied: total survival time, the development time of disease, reaction rate, the mid-survival time, adverse events and quality of life. Results Three RCTs involving 672 patients with metastatic breast cancer were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the overall survival (MD=3.00, 95%CI 1.64 to 4.36), disease time to progression (MD=1.85, 95%CI 1.15 to 2.55), and the response rate (RR=1.29, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.52) were superior in the combination arm to the docetaxel alone arm. Conclusion The current evidence available shows that the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel may significantly improve the short-term efficacy comparing with docetaxel alone. However, adverse events and long-term efficacy are not clear; more high-quality RCTs should be conducted.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based nursing methods for a patient with grade III handfoot syndrome induced by capecitabine. Methods Based on the cl inical questions, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), ACP Journal Club (1991 to January 2008), MEDLINE (1996 to 2008) and CBMdisc (1995 to 2008). The retrieved studies were further critically appraised. Results There were two effective measures in patients with grade III hand-foot syndrome induced by capecitabine: ① Treatment interruption or dose reduction with supportive measures to reduce pain and discomfort and prevent secondary infection. ② Using Traditional Chinese Medicine and no need of treatment interruption or dose reduction. With patients preference, Treatment interruption and supportive measures were administered to the patient. After two weeks, the patient had a complete response. Conclusions To patients with grade III hand-foot syndrome induced by capecitabine, treatment interruption and supportive measures are effective nursing methods.
ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of capacitance combined with irinotecan (CAPIRI) versus fluorouracil combined with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. MethodsDatabases such as Pubmed, Embase, Wanfang data, CNKI, Cochran Library were searched from January 2000 to October 2015. We evaluated the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and then extracted data from them. RevMan 5.2 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. ResultsEight RCTs studies with 1 634 advanced metastatic colorectal cancer patients were included based on our standard. CAPIRI regimen was equal to FOLFIRI regimen in complete response rate [RR=1.17, 95%CI (0.70, 1.96), P=0.56], overall respond rate [RR=0.90, 95%CI (0.79, 1.03), P=0.12], disease control rate [RR=0.93, 95%CI (0.87, 1.00), P=0.06], median progression-free survival [HR=1.00, 95%CI (0.72, 1.37), P=0.99], and median overall survival [HR=0.94, 95%CI (0.63, 1.40), P=0.77]. For safety, higher incidence rate of grade 3/4 vomiting [RR=1.91, 95%CI (1.13, 3.22), P=0.02], diarrhea [RR=2.84, 95%CI (2.22, 3.63), P<0.000 01], hand-foot syndrome [RR=4.55, 95%CI (2.15, 9.61), P<0.000 1] were confirmed for CAPIRI. The two methods had similar toxicities: nausea [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.64, 0.93), P=0.005], fatigue [RR=1.19, 95%CI (0.73, 1.94), P=0.47], febrile neutropenia [RR=1.59, 95%CI (0.89, 2.87), P=0.12], anemia [RR=1.74, 95%CI (0.59, 5.18), P=0.32], and leukopenia [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.64, 0.93), P=0.005]. ConclusionCapecitabine combined with irinotecan treatment for advanced colorectal cancer is effective and its toxicity is acceptable.
ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effects of capecitabine and hessaitin combined with whole brain radiotherapy for treatment the HER2 positive breast cancer with brain metastasis. MethodsThe clinical data of 60 cases HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastasis in our hospital in January 2004 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.The 32 cases of observe group were treated by using capecitabine and herceptin combined with whole brain radiotherapy, and the 28 cases of control group were treated by using capecitabine and cisplatin combined with whole brain radiotherapy.The disease control rate, toxicity rate, and survival rate were evaluated. ResultsCompared with the control group, the disease control rate, toxicity rate, and survival rate were all better in observe group (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe capecitabine and hessaitin combined with whole brain radiotherapy for treating patients with HER 2 positive brest cancer transferred to brain are effect and safe.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of Docetaxel injection and Capecitabine tablets combined with Oxaliplatin injection in chemotherapy for patients after esophageal cancer surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 101 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical surgery from June 2010 to December 2012, including 58 males and 43 females. According to the different treatment methods they were divided into a study group (58 patients, 32 males and 26 females, postoperatively receiving Docetaxel injection, Capecitabine tablets, Oxaliplatin injection and chemotherapy) and a control group (43 patients, 26 males and 17 females, taking Docetaxel injection and Capecitabine tablets for 4 consecutive courses). We compared the difference in the outcomes between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the level of serum anticancer antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) before chemotherapy between two groups (P>0.05). After chemotherapy, the level of serum CEA, CA125, CA199, SCC in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-year survival rate of the study group was 92.59% and the 2-year survival rate was 70.37%, which were not significantly different from those of the control group (P>0.05). The 3-year survival rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (57.41 %vs. 32.43%, P<0.05). The mean survival time of the study group was longer than that of the control group (31 monthsvs. 22 months, P=0.001). Conclusion Docetaxel injection and Capecitabine tablets combined with Oxaliplatin injection for the treatment of esophageal cancer surgery can significantly reduce levels of tumor markers in serum after esophageal cancer surgery, and is favorable for the long-term survival of patients, but adverse reactions should be noted.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on capecitabine combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer from inception to December, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Six RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, capecitabine combination chemotherapy extended the overall survival (HR=0.86, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.96, P=0.006) and disease progression-free survival (HR=0.83, 95%CI 0.75 to 0.91, P=0.000 2). Moreover, the objective response rate was significantly increased in capecitabine combination chemotherapy (RR=1.64, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.11, P=0.000 1). The results of 3–4 toxic side effects of 6 RCTs indicated that the incidence of neutropenia, stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome of capecitabine combination chemotherapy were obviously higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Capecitabine combination chemotherapy extend the overall survival and disease progression-free survival, and improve the objective response rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with irinotecan (CAPIRI) versus capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CAPIRI versus CAPOX for patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer from inception to August 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 1 049 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no significant differences in complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progression disease (PD), overall respond rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) between two groups (P>0.05). However, CARIRI group was lower on the disease control rate (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.00, P=0.04) than CAPOX group. Incidence of diarrhea was higher in CAPIRI group (RR=1.83, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.45, P<0.000 1). However, the incidence rate of peripheral neurotoxicity in CAPOX group was higher (RR=0.13, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.35, P<0.000 1). There were no significant differences between two groups in the incidence rates of nausea and vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia and alopecia (P>0.05).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that two groups are equivalent in terms of curative effects. CAPIRI has a higher incidence rate of diarrhea, while CAPOX has a higher risk of peripheral neurotoxicity. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.