Objective To investigate the etiological factors of endophthalmitis and evaluate the outcomes of vitrectomy for endophthalmitis.Methods From January 1999 to December 2001, 53 consecutive patients (54 eyes ), 38 men and 15 women, diagnosed as endophthalmitis were retrospectively evaluated. The patients′ ages ranged from 1 year to 74 years (mean 32 years). Two patients (2 eyes) with mild inflammation received antibiotic medication therapy, 5 patients (5 eyes) with no light perception and severe inflammation underwent evisceration, and the other 46 patients (47 eyes) underwent pars plana vitrectomy. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 2 to 32 months (mean 10.5 months). Results Endophthalmitis was diagnosed as resulting from penetrating injury in 32 eyes (59.26%), endogenous endophthalmitis in 8 eyes (14.81%), cataract surgery in 7 eyes (12.96%), gl au coma surgery in 2 eyes (3.70%), vitrectomy in 3 eyes (5.56%), radial keratotomy in 1 eye (1.85%), and unknown reason in 1 eye (1.85%). The postoperative visual a cuities (VA) of these patients increased significantly (P=0.003). The VA of the patients underwent vitrectomy in 3 days was obviously better than those after 3 days (P=0.014), and the VA of the patients underwent vitrectomy in 7 days was obviously beter than those after 7 days (P=0.021). Thirty-seven eyes (68.52 %) had functional success (VA≥0.02), 47 eyes (87.04%) had anatomical success (VAlt;0.02) , and 27 eyes (50.00%) were out of blindness (VA≥0.05). Conclusions Penetrating ocular injury, especially with retained intraocular foreign bodies, is the most common cause of suppurative endophthalmitis. Vitrectomy is a good method for the treatment of endophthalmitis. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：93-95)
Objective To systematically review the efficacy, safety and economic value of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for Chinese patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods We searched PubMed, WanFang Data, CNKI, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016) to collect case-control studies about HCR versus CABG for Chinese patients with coronary multivessel disease from the January 1996 to April 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 studies, involving 1 231 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the CABG groups, HCR group had lower length of ICU stay (MD=–25.84, 95% CI –42.55 to –9.13,P=0.002) and intubation time (MD=–4.06, 95% CI –6.43 to –1.69,P=0.000 8). However, there were no significant differences between both groups in the length of hospital stay (MD=–0.64, 95% CI –2.53 to 1.25,P=0.51), the incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR=1.41, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.30,P=0.17) and renal failure (OR=1.56, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.74,P=0.12). No significant differences were found between both groups in mortality (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.11,P=0.07), the incidence of myocardial infarction (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.85,P=0.20) and the incidence of target vessel revascularization (OR=1.16, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.76,P=0.74). But the incidence of the stroke (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91,P=0.03) and MACCEs (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.70,P=0.002) of the HCR group were lower than those of the patients of the CABG group. Conclusion The current evidence shows that, compared with the CABG groups, HCR had lower incidence of stroke and MACCEs, however, the safety and efficacy were not significantly different between both groups. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the relationship between periodontal disease and gastric cancer risk. Methods We retrieved PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases to collect studies about the correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer from inception to January 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Five studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.19, P=0.93). Sensitivity analysis showed good stability. Subgroup analysis showed that the type of study, race and type of effect size have no statistically impact on the outcome, there was no significant correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer. Conclusion According to the current evidence, periodontal disease probably is not a risk factor of gastric cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.